Skip to main content

Klassifikationen müssen angelernt werden

Classifications must be learned

A Leserbriefe to this article was published on 18 June 2021

The Originalien to this article was published on 03 March 2021

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. 1.

    Rommens PM, Hofmann A (2013) Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury 44(12):1733–1744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Matta JM (2003) Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(9):1704–1709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Koo H, Leveridge M, Thompson C, Zdero R, Bhandari M, Kreder HJ, Stephen D, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH (2008) Interobserver reliability of the young-burgess and tile classification systems for fractures of the pelvic ring. J Orthop Trauma 22(6):379–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Furey AJ, O’Toole RV, Nascone JW, Sciadini MF, Copeland CE, Turen C (2009) Classification of pelvic fractures: analysis of inter- and intraobserver variability using the Young-Burgess and Tile classification systems. Orthopedics 32(6):401

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Meling T, Harboe K, Enoksen CH, Aarflot M, Arthursson AJ, Søreide K (2012) How reliable and accurate is the AO/OTA comprehensive classification for adult long-bone fractures? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73(1):224–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gabbe BJ, Esser M, Bucknill A, Russ MK, Hofstee DJ, Cameron PA, Handley C, de Steiger RN (2013) The imaging and classification of severe pelvic ring fractures: experiences from two level 1 trauma centres. Bone Joint J 95-B(10):1396–1401

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Krappinger D, Kaser V, Kammerlander C, Neuerburg C, Merkel A, Lindtner RA (2019) Inter- and intraobserver reliability and critical analysis of the FFP classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries. Injury 50(2):337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Berger-Groch J, Thiesen DM, Grossterlinden LG, Schaewel J, Fensky F, Hartel MJ (2019) The intra- and interobserver reliability of the Tile AO, the Young and Burgess, and FFP classifications in pelvic trauma. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(5):645–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Pieroh P, Höch A, Hohmann T, Gras F, Märdian S, Pflug A, Wittenberg S, Ihle C, Blankenburg N, Dallacker-Losensky K, Schröder T, Herath SC, Wagner D, Palm HG, Josten C, Stuby FM (2019) Fragility fractures of the pelvis classification: a multicenter assessment of the intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities and percentage of agreement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101(11):987–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Pol Maria Rommens or Alexander Hofmann.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

P.M. Rommens und A. Hofmann geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rommens, P.M., Hofmann, A. Klassifikationen müssen angelernt werden. Unfallchirurg 124, 583–586 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-021-01022-6

Download citation