Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Blender

Universelle 3D-Bearbeitungs- und Animationssoftware

Blender

Universal 3D processing and animation software

  • Link-Tipp – Für Sie getestet
  • Published:
Der Unfallchirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Bruns N (2019) 3D Slicer: Universal 3D Visualization Software. Unfallchirurg 122(8):662–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-019-0654-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruns N, Krettek C (2019) 3D-printing in trauma surgery: planning, printing and processing. Unfallchirurg 122(4):270–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-019-0625-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganry L, Hersant B, Bosc R, Leyder P, Quilichini J, Meningaud JP (2018) Study of medical education in 3D surgical modeling by surgeons with free open-source software: Example of mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap and creation of its surgical guides. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 119(4):262–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2018.02.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kobayashi AIY, Takeda M et al (2012) Comparison of analog 2D and digital 3D preoperative templating for predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg. https://doi.org/10.3109/10929088.2011.651488

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Krettek C (2019) Bonesetter app: universal 2D planning software. Unfallchirurg 122(4):251–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-018-0600-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mueller S, Kahrs LA, Gaa J, Ortmaier T, Clausen JD, Krettek C (2017) Patient specific pointer tool for corrective osteotomy: quality of symmetry based planning and case study of ulnar reconstruction surgery. Injury 48(7):1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park L, Price-Williams S, Jalali A, Pirzada K (2019) Increasing access to medical training with three-dimensional printing: creation of an endotracheal Intubation model. JMIR Med Educ 5(1):e12626. https://doi.org/10.2196/12626

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Suero EM, Hufner T, Stubig T, Krettek C, Citak M (2010) Use of a virtual 3D software for planning of tibial plateau fracture reconstruction. Injury 41(6):589–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vanin N, Kenaway M, Panzica M, Jagodzinski M, Meller R, Krettek C et al (2010) Accuracy of digital preoperative planning for total knee arthroplasty. Technol Health Care 18(4/5):335–340. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-2010-0598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland

    Nico Bruns

Authors
  1. Nico Bruns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nico Bruns.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

N. Bruns gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden vom Autor keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bruns, N. Blender. Unfallchirurg 123, 747–750 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-020-00836-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-020-00836-0

Search

Navigation