Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MRT-Untersuchungen bei Muskelverletzungen

Was ist sinnvoll?

MRI in musculoskeletal imaging

Possibilities and limitations

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Unfallchirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Muskelverletzungen stellen die häufigsten Sportverletzungen dar. Neben der genauen klinischen Diagnostik sind bildgebende Verfahren wie MRT-Diagnostik und Ultraschall für die exakte Klassifikation notwendig, um eine Therapie und Rehabilitation zielgerichtet durchzuführen. Dieser Artikel hat zum Ziel, Möglichkeiten und Limitationen des MRT im Bereich der Sporttraumatologie vorzustellen und einen Überblick über die dabei zum Einsatz kommende Technik zu geben. Dabei stehen die vier großen Muskelgruppen (Hamstrings, Adduktoren, Gastrocnemius und die Kniestrecker im Mittelpunkt.

Abstract

Muscle injuries are the most frequent sport injuries in athletes. In addition to a thorough clinical examination and the history of the trauma mechanism, imaging modalities are required to correctly classify the injury and plan the future treatment and rehabilitation. The two major modalities are ultrasound and magnet resonance imaging (MRI). This article aims to give a comprehensive overview on the possibilities and limitations of MRI imaging in musculoskeletal injuries as well as insight into current development, classifications and technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9
Abb. 10
Abb. 11

Literatur

  1. Askling CM, Tengvar M, Saartok T, Thorstensson A (2007) Acute first-time hamstring strains during high-speed running a longitudinal study including clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Am J Sports Med 35(2):197–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Askling CM, Tengvar M, Saartok T, Thorstensson A (2008) Proximal hamstring strains of stretching type in different sports: injury situations, clinical and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics, and return to sport. Am J Sports Med 36(9):1799–1804. doi:10.1177/0363546508315892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blankenbaker DG, De Smet AA (2004) MR imaging of muscle injuries. Appl Radiol 33(4):14–26

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen SB, Towers JD, Zoga A et al (2011) Hamstring injuries in professional football players magnetic resonance imaging correlation with return to play. Sports Health 3(5):423–430

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Connell DA, Schneider-Kolsky ME, Hoving JL et al (2004) Longitudinal study comparing sonographic and MRI assessments of acute and healing hamstring injuries. Am J Roentgenol 183(4):975–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Crisco JJ, Jokl P, Heinen GT et al (1994) A muscle contusion injury model biomechanics, physiology, and histology. Am J Sports Med 22(5):702–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ekstrand J, Askling C, Magnusson H, Mithoefer K (2013) Return to play after thigh muscle injury in elite football players: implementation and validation of the Munich muscle injury classification. Br J Sports Med 47(12):769–774

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ekstrand J, Healy JC, Walden M et al (2012) Hamstring muscle injuries in professional football: the correlation of MRI findings with return to play. Br J Sports Med 46(2):112–117. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2011-090155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elliott MC, Zarins B, Powell JW, Kenyon CD (2011) Hamstring muscle strains in professional football players: a 10-year review. Am J Sports Med 39(4):843–850. doi:10.1177/0363546510394647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gielen JL, Robinson P, Van Dyck P et al (2007) Muscle injuries. In: Vanhoenacker FM, Maas MM, Gielen JL (Hrsg) Imaging of orthopedic sports injuries, 1. Aufl. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, S 15–39

  11. Jarvinen TA, Jarvinen TL, Kaariainen M et al (2005) Muscle injuries: biology and treatment. Am J Sports Med 33(5):745–764. doi:10.1177/0363546505274714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kary JM (2010) Diagnosis and management of quadriceps strains and contusions. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 3(1–4):26–31

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kerkhoffs GM, Es N van, Wieldraaijer T et al (2013) Diagnosis and prognosis of acute hamstring injuries in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(2):500–509. doi:10.1007/s00167-012-2055-x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Malliaropoulos N, Papacostas E, Kiritsi O et al (2010) Posterior thigh muscle injuries in elite track and field athletes. Am J Sports Med 38(9):1813–1819. doi:10.1177/0363546510366423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mueller-Wohlfahrt HW, Haensel L, Mithoefer K et al (2012) Terminology and classification of muscle injuries in sport: the Munich consensus statement. Br J Sports Med. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091448

  16. Nikolaou PK, Macdonald BL, Glisson RR et al (1987) Biomechanical and histological evaluation of muscle after controlled strain injury. Am J Sports Med 15(1):9–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Peetrons P (2002) Ultrasound of muscles. Eur Radiol 12(1):35–43. doi:10.1007/s00330-001-1164-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Slavotinek JP (2010) Muscle injury: the role of imaging in prognostic assignment and monitoring of muscle repair. In: Semin Musculoskelet Radiol©. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 194–200

  19. Slavotinek JP, Verrall GM, Fon GT (2002) Hamstring injury in athletes: using MR imaging measurements to compare extent of muscle injury with amount of time lost from competition. Am J Roentgenol 179(6):1621–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mauch F, Best R, Bauer G (2013) Aktuelle Behandlungskonzepte bei Muskelverletzungen. Unfallchirurg 116(6):488–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. F. Mauch, M. Kraus, J. Gülke und B. Ammann geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sektion Obere Extremität/Kernspintomographie (MRT), Sportklinik Stuttgart GmbH, Taubenheimstraße 8, 70372, Stuttgart, Deutschland

    F. Mauch M.A.

  2. Klinik für Wirbelsäulentherapie, Endoprothetik und orthopädische Onkologie, Hessing-Stiftung Augsburg, Augsburg, Deutschland

    M. Kraus

  3. Zentrum für Chirurgie, Klinik für Unfall-, Hand-, Plastische und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland

    J. Gülke

  4. Klinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland

    B. Ammann

Authors
  1. F. Mauch M.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Kraus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Gülke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. Ammann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Mauch M.A..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mauch, F., Kraus, M., Gülke, J. et al. MRT-Untersuchungen bei Muskelverletzungen. Unfallchirurg 117, 227–234 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-013-2402-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-013-2402-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation