Zusammenfassung
Die konservativ-funktionelle Therapie der Achillessehnenruptur hat sich in den letzten 20 Jahren weiter entwickelt und ist grundsätzlich für 60–80% der Patienten durchführbar. Die Therapie führt zum Erfolg, wenn die Indikation aufgrund der dynamischen Sonographie korrekt gestellt wird (Adaptation der Sehnenenden bis 20° Plantarflexion), die Patienten eine ausreichende Compliance aufweisen und die Physiotherapie abhängig von der Sehnenheilung zunehmend intensiviert wird. Moderne Orthesen erlauben eine vermehrte Spitzfußstellung und damit eine verbesserte Protektion der heilenden Sehne. Sind diese Faktoren gegeben, kann eine relativ niedrige Rerupturrate von 7% erreicht werden.
Der entscheidende Vorteil der konservativ-funktionellen Therapie ist das Vermeiden spezifischer operativer Risiken, wie einer Infektion und der N.-suralis-Verletzung. Nach Abnahme der Orthese sollte die Sehne noch durch Einlagen und Absatzerhöhung modelliert werden.
Abstract
The conservative functional treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures has developed further over the last 20 years and is basically possible for 60–80% of patients. The treatment leads to success if the indications obtained by dynamic sonography are correctly interpreted (adaptation of the tendon ends up to 20° plantar flexion), if the patient presents sufficient compliance and the physiotherapy is increasingly intensified depending on tendon healing. Modern ortheses allow an increased equinus position and therefore improved protection of the healing tendon. If these factors are present a relatively low re-rupture rate of only 7% can be achieved. The decisive advantage of conservative functional therapy is the avoidance of specific operative risks, such as infection and injury to the sural nerve. After removal of the orthesis the tendon should continue to be modeled using shoe insoles and raised heels.
Literatur
Hattrup SJ, Johnson KA (1985) A review of ruptures of the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle 6(1):34–38
Cetti R et al (1993) Operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study and review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 21(6):791–799
Boyden EM et al (1995) Late versus early repair of Achilles tendon rupture. Clinical and biomechanical evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 317:150–158
Boorboor P et al (2006) Resektion der infizierten Achillessehne. Ergebnisse nach plastischer Defektdeckung ohne Achillessehnenersatz. Chirurg 77(12):1144–1151
Sauerbier M et al (2000) Die Deckung von Weichteildefekten und instabilen Narben über der Achillessehne durch freie mikrochirurgische Lappenplastiken. Chirurg 71:1161–1166
Vico PG, Deraemaecker R (1998) Achilles tendon cover using a free lateral arm fascial flap. Eur J Plast Surg 21:290–292
Maffulli N (1998) The clinical diagnosis of subcutaneous tear of the Achilles tendon. A prospective study in 174 patients. Am J Sports Med 26(2):266–270
Matles AL (1975) Rupture of the tendon Achilles: another diagnostic test. Bull Hops Joint Dis 179:56–58
Thermann H et al (1992) Primary sonographic diagnosis and follow-up of muscular and tendon injuries of the lower extremity. Unfallchirurg 95(8):412–418
Hüfner T et al (2006) Long-term results after non operative functional treatment of Achilles‘ tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Int 27:167–171
Thermann H, Hüfner T, Tscherne H (2000) Achilles tendon rupture. Orthopäde 29(3):235–250
Hüfner T et al (2002) EMG monitoring during functional non-surgical therapy of Achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Int 23(7):614–618
Ribbans WJ, Ramanathan N (2007) Medico-legal aspects of Achilles tendon disorders. In: Maffulli N, Almekinders L (eds) The Achilles tendon. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 252–268
Reilmann H et al (1996) Conservative functional therapy of closed rupture of the Achilles tendon. Treatment approach and analysis of results. Unfallchirurg 99(8):576–580
Stein SR, Luekens CA Jr (1976) Closed treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures. Orthop Clin North Am 7(1):241–246
Lo IK et al (1997) Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a quantitative review. Clin J Sport Med 7(3):207–211
Wills CA et al (1986) Achilles tendon rupture. A review of the literature comparing surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 207:156–163
Khan RJ et al (2005) Treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 87(10):2202–2210
Zwipp H et al (1990) An innovative concept for primary functional treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. Sportverletz Sportschaden 4(1):29–35
McComis GP, Nawoczenski DA, DeHaven KE (1997) Functional bracing for rupture of the Achilles tendon. Clinical results and analysis of ground-reaction forces and temporal data. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 79(12):1799–1808
Ajis A, Wallace R (2007) Conservative management of acute Achilles tendon rupture. In: Maffulli N, Almekinders L (eds) The Achilles tendon. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 151–158
Kellam JF, Hunter GA, McElwain JP (1985) Review of the operative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 201:80–83
Schwarz B, Heisel J, Mittelmeier H (1984) Rupture of the Achilles tendon, cause – prognosis – therapy – late results. Akt Traumatol 14(1):8–14
Gillies H, Chalmers J (1970) The management of fresh ruptures of the tendon Achilles. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 52(2):337–343
Nistor L (1981) Surgical and non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 63(3):394–399
Thermann H, Zwipp H, Tscherne H (1995) Functional treatment concept of acute rupture of the Achilles tendon. 2 years results of a prospective randomized study. Unfallchirurg 98(1):21–32
Cetti R, Christensen SE (1983) Surgical treatment under local anesthesia of Achilles tendon rupture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 173:204–208
Leppilahti J et al (2000) Relationship between calf muscle size and strength after achilles rupture repair [In Process Citation]. Foot Ankle Int 21(4):330–335
Schelle H (1955) Längen- und Umfangs- und Bewegungsmasse des menschlichen Körpers. Barth, Leipzig
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hüfner, T., Gaulke, R., Imrecke, J. et al. Konservativ-funktionelle Behandlung der Achillessehnenruptur. Unfallchirurg 113, 699–704 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-010-1833-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-010-1833-5