Skip to main content
Log in

Two wheels – too dangerous?

Eine Analyse von Unfalldaten und Bundesstatistik

Two wheels – too dangerous?

Analysis of real-world crash data and federal statistics

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Unfallchirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Motorisierte Zweiradfahrer profitieren weniger von verbesserten Sicherheits- und Versorgungskonzepten als andere Verkehrsteilnehmer. Ziel der Untersuchung war es, neue Erkenntnisse zur Unfallentstehung und den resultierenden Verletzungen zu gewinnen sowie Trends im Unfallgeschehen der letzten 10 Jahre aufzuzeigen.

Methodik

In einer prospektiven Erhebung wurden von Januar 2001 bis Januar 2005 Daten von Unfällen erfasst, bei denen mindestens eine Person aus dem Unfallgeschehen einen Verletzungsgrad von 2–6 nach dem „Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale“ (MAIS) aufwies. Zusätzlich wurden Daten des Statistischen Bundesamtes analysiert.

Ergebnisse

Es wurden die Daten von 66 Motorradunfällen mit 66 Verletzten erhoben. Der mittlere ISS betrug 17,9, die untere Extremität (44%) und der Kopf (41%) waren am häufigsten verletzt. Ein psychometrischer Fragebogen zeigt eine signifikant höhere Risikobereitschaft bei den Zweiradfahrern im Vergleich mit Fahrern anderer Fahrzeuge an. In der Bundesstatistik findet sich zu Beginn des Jahres 2007 erstmalig eine starke Zunahme getöteter Motorradfahrer. Diese Zahlen sanken aber im Jahresverlauf wieder auf das Niveau des Vorjahres ab.

Schlussfolgerungen

Das Wissen über Unfallentstehung, Verletzungsmuster und Profile von „Risikofahrern“ kann zur Verminderung der Unfallhäufigkeit und Verletzungsschwere von Motorradfahrern beitragen.

Abstract

Background

Motorcyclists profit from improved safety measures and medical care only slightly compared with other road users. The aims of this study were to gain new insights into crash mechanisms and the resulting injuries of motorcyclists and to understand trends in road traffic accident statistics over the last 10 years.

Methods

In our prospective analysis we documented data from collisions in which at least one subject sustained an injury of 2–6 on the Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS). Additionally, key parameters published by the German Federal Statistical Office were analysed.

Results

Data were studied for 66 motorcycle crashes and 66 injured subjects. The mean ISS was 17.9, with injuries of the lower limb (44%) and head (41%) being the most frequent in motorcyclists. Psychometric questionnaires revealed that motorcyclists had a significantly higher willingness to take risks compared with drivers of other vehicles. Federal statistics revealed a dramatic increase in mortality in the first months of 2007, but in the next months, mortality decreased to levels comparable to those of the preceding year.

Conclusions

Knowledge of crash mechanisms, injury patterns and profiles of high-risk drivers can help reduce the collision rates and injury severity of motorcyclists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Andresen B (1986) Reizsuche und Erlebnismotive I: Eine psychometrische Reanalyse der SSS V Zuckermans im Kontext der MISAP-Entwicklung. Z Diff Diagn Psychol 7:177–203

    Google Scholar 

  2. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (1995) The Abbreviated Injury Scale – 1990 revision. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Illinois, USA

  3. Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W, Long WB (1974) The injury severitiy score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14:187–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke DD, Ward P, Bartke C, Truman W (2007) The role of motorcyclist and other driver behaviour in two types of serious accident in the UK. Accid Anal Prev 39:974–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coben JH, Steiner CA, Owens P (2004) Motorcycle-related hospitalizations in the United States, 2001. Am J Prev Med 27:355–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coben JH, Steiner CA, Miller TR (2007) Characteristics of motorcycle-related hospitalizations: Comparing states with different helmet laws. Accid Anal Prev 39:190–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dahlen ER, Martin RC, Ragan K, Kuhlmann MM (2005) Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving. Accid Anal Prev 37:341–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Brabander B, Nuyts E, Vereeck L (2005) Road safety of roundabouts in Flanders. J Safety Res 36:289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dischinger PC, Read KM, Kufera JA et al (2004) Consequences and costs of lower extremity injuries. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med 8:339–359

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elliott MA, Baughan CJ, Sexton BF (2007) Errors and violations in relation to motorcyclists’ crash risk. Accid Anal Prev 39:491–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hitosugi M, Takatsu A, Shigeta A (1999) Injuries of motorcyclists and bicyclists examined at autopsy. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 20:251–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hundley JC, Kilgo PD, Miller PR et al (2004) Non-helmeted motorcyclists: a burden to society? A study using the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma 57:944–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeffers RF, Tan HB, Nicolopoulos C et al (2004) Prevalence and patterns of foot injuries following motorcycle trauma. J Orthop Trauma 18:87–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kasantikul V, Ouellet JV, Smith TA (2003) Head and neck injuries in fatal motorcycle collisions as determined by detailed autopsy. Traffic Inj Prev 4:255–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin MR, Chang SH, Huang W et al (2003) Factors associated with severity of motorcycle injuries among young adult riders. Ann Emerg Med 41:783–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matthes G, Schmucker U, Lignitz E et al (2006) Does the frontal airbag avoid thoracic Injury? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:541–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Matthes G, Schmucker U, Schindel M et al (2007) Baumunfälle im Straßenverkehr – Unfallmechanismus und Verletzungsmuster. Zentralbl Chir 132:142–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mullin B, Jackson R, Langley J, Norton R (2000) Increasing age and experience: are both protective against motorcycle injury? A case-control study. Inj Prev 6:32–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Otte D, Pohlemann T, Wiese B, Krettek C (2003) Änderung des Verletzungsmusters Polytraumatisierter in den zurückliegenden 30 Jahren. Unfallchirurg 106:448–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Paulozzi LJ (2005) The role of sales of new motorcycles in a recent increase in motorcycle mortality rates. J Safety Res 36:361–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Peden M, Scurfield R, Sleet D et al (2004) World report on road traffic injury prevention. World Health Organisation, Geneva

  22. Peek C, Braver ER, Shen H, Krauss J (1994) Lower extremity injuries from motorcycle crashes: a common cause of preventable injury. J Trauma 37:358–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Savolainen P, Mannering F (2007) Probalistic models of motorcyclists‚ injuy severities in single- and multi-vehicle crashes. Accid Anal Prev 39:955–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden (Hrsg) (2008) Fachserie 8 Reihe 7: Verkehr – Verkehrsunfälle – Dezember 2007. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden. www.destatis.de

  25. Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden (Hrsg) (2007) Verkehrsunfälle – Zeitreihen 2006. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden. www.destatis.de

  26. Whissell RW, Bigelow BJ (2003) The speeding attidude scale and the role of sensation seeking in profiling young drivers at risk. Risk Anal 23:811–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wick M, Ekkernkamp A, Muhr G (1997) Motorradunfälle im Straßenverkehr – Eine Analyse von 86 Fällen. Unfallchirurg 100:140–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wick M, Müller EJ, Ekkernkamp A, Muhr G (1998) The motorcyclist: easy rider or easy victim? An analysis of motorcycle accidents in Germany. Am J Emerg Med 16:320–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yannis G, Golias J, Papadimitriou E (2005) Driver age and vehicle engine size effects on fault and severity in young motorcyclists accidents. Acc Anal Prev 37:327–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zambon F, Hasselberg M (2006) Factors affecting the severity of injuries among young motorcyclists – a Swedish nationwide cohort study. Traffic Inj Prev 7:143–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zettas JP, Zettas P, Thanasophon B (1979) Injury patterns in motorcycle accidents. J Trauma 19:833–836

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zuckerman M (1984) Experience and desire: A new format for Sensation Seeking Scales. J Psychopathol Behav Assess (Historical Archive) 6:101–114

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Schmucker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmucker, U., Frank, M., Seifert, J. et al. Two wheels – too dangerous?. Unfallchirurg 111, 968–976 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-008-1522-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-008-1522-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation