Skip to main content
Log in

Der Einfluss einer aktiven Bewegungsschiene auf die Propriozeption nach vorderer Kreuzbandplastik

Eine prospektiv randomisierte Studie

The influence of a controlled active motion splint on proprioception after anterior cruciate ligament plasty

A prospective rndomized study

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Unfallchirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Nach einer VKB-Ruptur besteht neben der mechanischen eine durch das propriozeptive Defizit bedingte funktionelle Instabilität. Es sollte überprüft werden, ob durch Einsatz von CAM-Schienen unmittelbar postoperativ das propriozeptive Defizit gesenkt werden kann.

Patienten und Methoden

In dieser prospektiv randomisierten Studie wurden 50 Patienten nach VKB-Plastik in eine PT-Gruppe (Physiotherapie) und eine CAM-Gruppe (Physiotherapie + aktive Bewegungsschiene) eingeteilt. Die propriozeptive Leistung wurde mit einem passiven Winkelreproduktionstest gemessen.

Ergebnisse

Bei Entlassung wurde bei 80% der CAM-Patienten und 25% der PT-Patienten eine Reduktion des propriozeptiven Defizits gemessen. Die CAM-Gruppe zeigte in der Hauptzielgröße eine Verbesserung um 83,7%. Die PT-Gruppe verschlechterte sich um 39,3%. Es bestand kein signifikanter Unterschied zwischen der CAM-Gruppe und einer gesunden Kontrollgruppe.

Schlussfolgerung

Durch den postoperativen Einsatz der CAM-Schiene kann das propriozeptive Defizit gegenüber einer alleinigen Physiotherapie signifikant reduziert werden.

Abstract

Background

A ruptured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) leads to both mechanical and functional instability. Functional instability is caused by proprioceptive deficit. The aim of this study was to determine whether the proprioceptive deficit can be reduced by using a controlled active motion (CAM) splint postoperatively.

Patients and methods

A total of 50 patients with ACL rupture were randomized into two groups. After ACL plasty the PT group received postoperative physiotherapy, while the CAM group were managed with a CAM splint and physiotherapy. Proprioceptive ability was measured with a passive angle-reproduction test.

Results

On the day of discharge 80% of the patients in the CAM group and 25% in the PT group had a reduced proprioceptive deficit. Overall the main measured value in the CAM group improved by 83.7%, but deteriorated by 39.3% in the PT group. There was no significant difference between the CAM group and a healthy control group.

Conclusion

Using a CAM splint in addition to physiotherapy after ACL plasty in comparison to physiotherapy alone decreases the proprioceptive deficit significantly. We recommend the use of a CAM splint in the postoperative management following ACL plasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Ageberg E, Zatterstrom R, Moritz U, Friden T (2001) Influence of supervised and nonsupervised training on postural control after an acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a three-year longitudinal prospective study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 31(11): 632–644

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad CS, Stein BE, Jeshuran W, Nercessian OA, Henry JH (2001) Anterior cruciate ligament function after tibial eminence fracture in skeletally mature patients. Am J Sports Med 29(3): 339–345

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aune AK, Hukkanen M, Madsen JE, Polak JM, Nordslettem L (1996) Nerve regeneration during patellar tendon autograft remodelling after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an experimental and clinical study. J Orthop Res 14(2): 193–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartlett MJ, Warren PJ (2002) Effect of warming up on knee proprioception before sporting activity. Br J Sports Med 36(2): 132–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beard DJ, Dodd CA, Simpson HA (2000) Sensorimotor changes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 372: 205–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beard DJ, Kyberd PJ, Fergusson CM, Dodd CA (1993) Proprioception after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligement. An objective indication of the need of surgery? J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(2): 311–315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonfim TR, Jansen Paccola CA, Barela JA (2003) Proprioceptive and behavior impairments in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84(8): 1217–1223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Borsa PA, Lephart SM, Irrgang JJ, Safran MR, Fu FH (1997) The effects of joint position and direction of joint motion on proprioceptive sensibility in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient athletes. Am J Sports Med 25(3): 336–340

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouet V, Gahery Y (2000) Muscular exercise improves knee position sense in humans. Neurosci Lett 289(2): 143–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Co FH, Skinner HB, Cannon WD (1993) Effect of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on proprioception of the knee and the heel strike transient. J Orthop Res 11(5): 696–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Denti M, Monteleone M, Berardi A, Panni AS (1994) Anterior cruciate ligament mechanoreceptors. Histologic studies on lesions and reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 308: 29–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Frank CB, Jackson DW (1997) The science of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(10): 1556–1576

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Freiwald J, Engelhardt M, Reuter I, Konrad P, Gnewuch A (1997) Die nervöse Versorgung der Kniegelenke. Wien Med Wochenschr 147(23-24): 531–541

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fremerey RW, Lobenhoffer P, Born I, Tscherne H, Bosch U (1998) Can knee joint proprioception by reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament be restored? A prospective longitudinal study]. Unfallchirurg 101(9): 697–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fremerey RW, Lobenhoffer P, Zeichen J et al (2000) Proprioception after rehabilitation and reconstruction in knees with deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament: a prospective, longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82(6): 801–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Friden T, Roberts D, Ageberg E, Walden M, Zatterstrom R (2001) Review of knee proprioception and the relation to extremity function after an anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 31(10): 567–576

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Friden T, Roberts D, Zatterstrom R, Lindstrand A, Moritz U (1996) Proprioception in the nearly extended knee. Measurements of position and movement in healthy individuals and in symptomatic anterior cruciate ligament injured patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 4(4): 217–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grüber J, Wolter D, Lierse W (1986) Der vordere Kreuzbandreflex. Unfallchirurg 89(12): 551–554

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hewett TE, Paterno MV, Myer GD (2002) Strategies for enhancing proprioception and neuromuscular control of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404: 76–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hogervorst T, Brand RA (1998) Mechanoreceptors in joint function. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(9): 1365–1378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jerosch J, Pfaff G, Thorwesten L, Schoppe R (1998) Effects of a proprioceptive training program on sensorimotor capacities of the lower extremity in patients with anterior cruciate ligament instability. Sportverletz Sportschaden 12(4): 121–130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jerosch J, Prymka M (1995) Proprioceptive capacities of the healthy knee joint: modification by an elastic bandage. Sportverletz Sportschaden 9(3): 72–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jerosch J, Prymka M (1996) Knee joint proprioception in normal volunteers and patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears, taking special account of the effect of a knee bandage. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 115(3-4): 162–166

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jerosch J, Prymka M (1996) Proprioceptive capacity of the knee joint area in patients after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Unfallchirurg 99(11): 861–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Johansson H, Lorentzon R, Sjolander P, Sojka P (1990) The anterior cruciate ligament. A sensor acting on the y-muscle-spindle systems of muscles around the knee joint. Neuro Orthop 9: 1

    Google Scholar 

  26. Johansson H, Sjolander P, Sojka P (1991) Receptors in the knee joint ligaments and their role in the biomechanics of the joint. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 18(5): 341–368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lephart SM, Giraldo JL, Borsa PA, Fu FH (1996) Knee joint proprioception: a comparison between female intercollegiate gymnasts and controls. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 4(2): 121–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lephart SM, Kocher MS, Fu FH, Borsa PA, Harner CD (1992) Proprioception following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Sport Rehabil 1:188–196

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lephart SM, Pincivero DM, Giraldo JL, Fu FH (1997) The role of proprioception in the management and rehabilitation of athletic injuries. Am J Sports Med 25(1): 130–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. MacDonald PB, Hedden D, Pacin O, Sutherland K (1996) Proprioception in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med 24(6): 774–778

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ochi M, Murao T, Sumen Y, Kobayashi K, Adachi N (1999) Isolated posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency induces morphological changes of anterior cruciate ligament collagen fibrils. Arthroscopy 15(3): 292–296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Reider B, Arcand MA, Diehl LH et al. (2003) Proprioception of the knee before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 19(1): 2–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rivera JE (1994) Open versus closed kinetic chain rehabilitation of the lower extremity: a functional and biomechanical analysis. J Sport Rehabil 3: 154–167

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rudroff T (2003) Functional capability is enhanced with semitendinosus than patellar tendon ACL repair. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35(9): 1486–1492

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schultz RA, Miller DC, Kerr C, Micheli L (1984) Mechanoreceptors in human cruciate ligaments. J Bone Joint Surg 66(7): 1072–1076

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Valeriani M, Restuccia D, Di Lazarro V et al. (1999) Clinical and neurophysiological abnormalities before and after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. Acta Neurol Scand 99(5): 303–307

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Friemert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friemert, B., v. Lübken, F., Schmidt, R. et al. Der Einfluss einer aktiven Bewegungsschiene auf die Propriozeption nach vorderer Kreuzbandplastik. Unfallchirurg 109, 22–29 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-005-1006-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-005-1006-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation