Skip to main content
Log in

Arzneimittelüberempfindlichkeit im Kindes- und Jugendalter

Klinische Symptome und Diagnostik häufiger Krankheitsbilder

Drug hypersensitivity in childhood and adolescence

Clinical symptoms and diagnostics of frequent disease patterns

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Bei bis zu 10 % der pädiatrischen Patienten ergibt sich aufgrund elterlicher Angaben der Verdacht auf eine Arzneimittelüberempfindlichkeit. Diese kann sich klinisch einerseits als Sofortreaktion mit Urtikaria, Angioödemen oder Anaphylaxie äußern. Andererseits sind klinisch heterogene Spätreaktionen möglich, die von häufigen, milden Exanthemen („benign rashes“) bis zu sehr seltenen, schweren Arzneimittelreaktionen wie der toxischen epidermalen Nekrolyse reichen. Als häufigste Auslöser werden Betalactamantibiotika, nichtsteroidale Antirheumatika und Nichtbetalactamantibiotika vermutet. Allerdings lässt sich eine Überempfindlichkeit gegen das inkriminierte Arzneimittel in über 90 % der Verdachtsfälle ausschließen. Hierfür sind die eingehende Anamnese und die konsequente kinderallergologische Evaluation erforderlich. Validierte In-vitro-Untersuchungsmethoden stehen nur in geringem Maß zur Verfügung, während standardisierte Hauttestungen häufig eine niedrige Sensitivität aufweisen. Als diagnostischer Goldstandard gilt daher die titrierte, orale Provokationstestung mit dem vermuteten Auslöser oder einem potenziell kreuzreaktiven Ausweichpräparat.

Abstract

Parental suspicion of drug hypersensitivity is encountered in up to 10% of pediatric patients. Immediate hypersensitivity reactions consist of acute urticaria, angioedema and anaphylaxis; however, delayed reactions are also possible and range from mild benign rashes to rare severe drug reactions, such as toxic epidermal necrolysis. Beta-lactam antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and non-beta-lactam antibiotics are the most frequently reported trigger agents; however, in over 90% of cases drug hypersensitivity can be ruled out by a detailed medical history and a thorough allergological work-up. In vitro tests are still insufficiently validated, while standardized skin tests are frequently limited by a low diagnostic sensitivity. Therefore, titrated oral provocation tests with the suspected trigger drug or potentially cross-reactive, alternative substances remain the diagnostic gold standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Aberer W, Bircher A, Romano A et al (2003) Drug provocation testing in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: general considerations. Allergy 58:854–863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Atanaskovic-Markovic M, Cirkovic Velickovic T, Gavrovic-Jankulovic M et al (2005) Immediate allergic reactions to cephalosporins and penicillins and their cross-reactivity in children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 16:341–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Atanaskovic-Markovic M, Gaeta F, Medjo B et al (2016) Non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics in children – our 10-year experience in allergy work-up. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 27(5):533–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baldo BA (1999) Penicillins and cephalosporins as allergens – structural aspects of recognition and cross-reactions. Clin Exp Allergy 29:744–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barni S, Mori F, Sarti L et al (2015) Utility of skin testing in children with a history of non-immediate reactions to amoxicillin. Clin Exp Allergy 45(9):1472–1474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Belver MT, Michavila A, Bobolea I et al (2016) Severe delayed skin reactions related to drugs in the paediatric age group: a review of the subject by way of three cases (Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis and DRESS). Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 44(1):83–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blanca M, Romano A, Torres MJ et al (2009) Update on the evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions to betalactams. Allergy 64:183–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brockow K, Przybilla B, Aberer W et al (2015) Guideline for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions. Allergo J Int 24:94–105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Caubet JC, Kaiser L, Lemaitre B et al (2011) The role of penicillin in benign skin rashes in childhood: a prospective study based on drug rechallenge. J Allergy Clin Immunol 127:218–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Erkoçoğlu M, Kaya A, Civelek E et al (2013) Prevalence of confirmed immediate type drug hypersensitivity reactions among school children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 24(2):160–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gomes ER, Fonsecaw J, Araujow L et al (2007) Drug allergy claims in children: from self-reporting to confirmed diagnosis. Clin Exp Allergy 38:191–198

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gomes ER, Brockow K, Kuyucu S et al (2016) Drug hypersensitivity in children: report from the pediatric task force of the EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group. Allergy 71:149–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grabenhenrich LB, Dölle S, Moneret-Vautrin A et al (2016) Anaphylaxis in children and adolescents: The European Anaphylaxis Registry. J Allergy Clin Immunol 137(4):1128–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunziker T, Bruppacher R, Kuenzi UP et al (2002) Classification of ADRs: a proposal for harmonization and differentiation based on the experience of the Comprehensive Hospital Drug Monitoring Bern/St. Gallen, 1974–1993. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 11(2):159–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ibia EO, Schwartz RH, Wiedermann BL (2000) Antibiotic rashes in children. A survey in a private practice setting. Arch Dermatol 136:849–854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lange L, Van Koningsbruggen S, Rietschel E (2008) Questionnaire-based survey of life-time incidence and character of allergic drug reactions in German children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 19:634–638

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marrs T, Fox AT, Lack G et al (2015) The diagnosis and management of antibiotic allergy in children: systematic review to inform a contemporary approach. Arch Dis Child 100(6):583–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mill C, Primeau MN, Medoff E et al (2016) Assessing the diagnostic properties of a graded oral provocation challenge for the diagnosis of immediate and nonimmediate reactions to amoxicillin in children. JAMA Pediatr 170(6):e160033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mirakian R, Ewan PW, Durham SR et al (2009) BSACI guidelines for the management of drug allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 39(1):43–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Misirlioglu ED, Toyran M, Capanoglu M et al (2014) Negative predictive value of drug provocation tests in children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 25(7):685–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mori F, Cianferoni A, Barni S et al (2015) Amoxicillin allergy in children: five-day drug provocation test in the diagnosis of nonimmediate reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 3(3):375–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ring J, Beyer K, Biedermann T et al (2014) Guideline for acute therapy and management of anaphylaxis. Allergo J Int 23:96–112

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Steiner M, Harrer A, Himly M (2016) Basophil reactivity as biomarker in immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions-potential and limitations. Front Pharmacol 7:171

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Torres MJ, Blanca M, Fernandez J et al (2003) Position paper: diagnosis of immediate allergic reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics. Allergy 58:961–972

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vezir E, Misirlioglu ED, Civelek E et al (2016) Direct oral provocation tests in non-immediate mild cutaneous reactions related to beta-lactam antibiotics. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 27:50–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. WHO (1972) International drug monitoring: the role of national centres. Report of a WHO meeting. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 498:1–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to L. Lange or H. Ott.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

L. Lange, S. Gernert, C. Rose-Diekmann, A. Arens und H. Ott geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren. Alle Patienten, die über Bildmaterial oder anderweitige Angaben innerhalb des Manuskripts zu identifizieren sind, haben hierzu ihre schriftliche Einwilligung gegeben. Im Fall von nichtmündigen Patienten liegt die Einwilligung eines Erziehungsberechtigten oder des gesetzlich bestellten Betreuers vor.

Additional information

Redaktion

G. Hansen, Hannover

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lange, L., Gernert, S., Rose-Diekmann, C. et al. Arzneimittelüberempfindlichkeit im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 165, 131–138 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00112-016-0223-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00112-016-0223-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation