Skip to main content
Log in

Bindung und geschlechtsspezifische Entwicklung

  • Geschlechtsspezifische Erkrankungen
  • Published:
Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Nach der Bindungstheorie von Bowlby entwickelt jeder Mensch im 1. Lebensjahr Bindungen an dauerhafte Pflegepersonen, die phylogenetisch dem Schutz und Überleben von Jungen und Art dienen. Während die Bindung als affektives Band zwischen Säugling und Bezugsperson als umweltstabil gilt, wird die Organisation dieser Bindung als umweltlabil angesehen, da sie von den unterschiedlichen Erfahrungen eines Kindes mit seinen mehr oder weniger feinfühligen Bezugspersonen bestimmt ist. Die Erfahrungen werden in sog. internalen Arbeitsmodellen von Bindung gespeichert. Diese Modelle befähigen das Individuum zur Simulation oder Vorwegnahme der Ereignisse der realen Welt. So kann es sein Verhalten vorausschauend planen und sich durch Wahrnehmungsfokussierung, Interpretation und Antizipation der Umwelt anpassen.

Die Suche nach geschlechtsspezifischen Aspekten der Entwicklung von Bindung betrifft vor allem 2 Fragen:

1.):

Gibt es bei der grundlegenden Bindungsentwicklung Geschlechtsunterschiede?

2.):

Wirkt sich die Bindungsqualität unterschiedlich auf die sozioemotionale Entwicklung von Jungen und Mädchen aus?

Die Ergebnisse von Längsschnittuntersuchungen zu diesen Fragen werden im Folgenden aufgezeigt.

Abstract

The attachment theory of Bowlby posits that the establishment of strong affectional bonds to the primary caregiver during the first year of life is universal in all human beings. The biological function is the protection of the child and the provision of survival advantage. The development of attachment relationships as a basic principle is environmentally stable. But there are individual differences in the organization of relationships during infancy, based on different experiences of the child with his more or less sensitive caregivers. Based on its early experiences a child constructs internal working models of attachment. These mental models are useful in appraising and guiding behavior in new situations, to generate interpretations of the present and evaluate alternative courses of future action.

The search for gender specific aspects of attachment considers two questions:

1.):

Are there gender differences in the basic development of attachment relationships?

2.):

Does attachment security and insecurity effect the socio-emotional development of boys and girls in a different way?

The answers to these questions according to several studies are shown in the following article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ainsworth MDS, Bell SM, Stayton DJ (1974) Infant-mother attachment and social development: "Socialization" as a product of reciprocal responsiveness to signals. In: Richards PM (ed) The integration of a child into a social world. Cambridge University Press, pp 99–135

  2. Ainsworth MDS (1977) Attachment theory and its utility in cross-cultural research. In: Leiderman PH, Tulkin SR, Rosenfeld A (eds) Culture and infancy. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–94

  3. Ainsworth MDS (1977) Skalen zur Erfassung mütterlichen Verhaltens: Feinfühligkeit versus Unempfindlichkeit gegenüber den Signalen des Babys. In: Grossmann KE (Hrsg) Entwicklung der Lernfähigkeit. Kindler, München, S 96–107

  4. Ainsworth MDS (1985) Patterns of infant-mother attachments: Antecedents and effects on development. Bull N Y Acad Med 61: 771–791

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S (1978) Patterns of attachment. A psychological study of the strange situation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

  6. Ainsworth MDS, Wittig BA (1969) Attachment and the exploratory behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. In: Foss BM (ed) Determinants of infant behavior, vol. 4. Methuen, London: pp 113–136

  7. Barglow P, Contreras J, Kavesh I, Vaughn BE (1998) Developmental follow-up of 6–7 year old children of mothers employed during their infancies. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 29: 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biringen Z, Robinson JL, Emde RN (1994) Maternal sensitivity in the second year: Gender based relations in the dyadic balance of control. Am J Orthopsychiatry 64: 78–90

    Google Scholar 

  9. Block JH (1976) Assessing sex differences: issues, problems and pitfalls. Merril Palmer Quart 22: 283–308

  10. Block J (1983) Differential premises arising from differential socialisation of the sexes: Some conjectures. Child Dev 54: 1335–1354

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bowlby J (1969) Attachment and loss. Hogarth, London

  12. Bowlby J (1976) Trennung. Kindler, München

  13. Bowlby J (1987) Attachment. In: Gregory RL (ed) The Oxford companion to the mind. Oxford University Press, pp 57–58

  14. Bowlby J (1995b) Die Entwicklungspsychiatrie wird erwachsen. In: Bowlby J (Hrsg) Elternbindung und Persönlichkeitsentwicklung. Dexter, Heidelberg, S 145–163

  15. Bowlby J (1995) Bindung: Historische Wurzeln, theoretische Konzepte und klinische Relevanz. In: Spangler G, Zimmermann P (Hrsg) Die Bindungstheorie: Grundlagen, Forschung und Anwendung. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart, S 17–26

  16. Bretherton I (1999) Updating the 'internal working model' construct: Some reflections. Attachm Hum Dev 1: 343–358

  17. Cairns RB, Kroll AB (1994) Developmental perspective on gender differences and similarities. In: Rutter M, Hay DF (eds) Development through life. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 350–372

  18. Chibucos TR, Kail PR (1981) Longitudinal examination of father-infant interaction and infant-father attachment. Merrill Palmer Quat 27: 81–96

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chodorow N (1985) Das Erbe der Mütter: Psychoanalyse und Soziologie der Geschlechter. München

  20. Cohn DA (1990) Child-mother attachment of six-year olds and social competence at school. Child Dev 61: 152–162

    Google Scholar 

  21. Egeland B, Carlson E, Sroufe LA (1993) Resilience as process. Dev Psychopathol 5: 517–528

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fagot BI, Kavanagh K (1993) Parenting during the second year: effects of childrens's age, sex and attachment classification. Child Dev 64: 258–271

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fremmer-Bombik E (1995) Innere Arbeitsmodelle von Bindung. In Spangler G, Zimmermann P (Hrsg) Die Bindungstheorie: Grundlagen, Forschung und Anwendung. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart, S 109–139

  24. Grossmann K (1989). Differential effect odf attachment quality to mother and father on boys and girls. 10th Biennal Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development

  25. Grossmann KE, Grossmann KE, Grossmann K, Huber F, Wartner U (1981) German children's behavior towards their mothers at 12 months and their fathers at 18 months in Ainsworth's Strange Situation. Int J Behav Dev 4: 157–181

    Google Scholar 

  26. Grossmann K, Grossmann KE (1991) Newborn behavior, early parenting quality and later toddler-parent relationships in a group of German infants. In: Nugent JK, Lester BM, Brazelton TB (eds) The cultural context of infancy, vol. 2. Ablex, Norwood, pp 3–38

  27. Grossmann K, Kindler H (2001) Differential influences on girls' and boys' attachment development. Xth European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Uppsala, Sweden

  28. Grossmann KE, Grossmann K (1991) Attachment quality as an organizer of emotional and behavioral responses in a longitudinal perspective. In: Parkes CM, Stevenson-Hinde J, Marris P (eds) Attachment across the life cycle. Tavistock, Routledge, London New York, pp 93–114

  29. Grossmann KE, Grossmann K (1994) Bindungstheoretische Grundlagen psychologisch sicherer und unsicherer Entwicklung. Z Ges Wissenschaftl Gesprächspsychother 96: 26–41

    Google Scholar 

  30. Grossmann KE, Grossmann K, Schwan A (1986) Capturing the wider view of attachment: A reanalysis of Ainsworth's Strange Situation. In: Izard CE, Read PB (eds) Measuring emotions in infants and children, 2. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 124–171

  31. Grossmann KE, Grossmann K, Kindler H et al. (2003) Die Bindungstheorie: Modell, entwicklungspsychologische Forschung und Ergebnisse. In: Keller H (Hrsg) Handbuch der Kleinkindforschung. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio (im Druck)

  32. Grossmann KE, Grossmann K, Zimmermann P (1999) A wider view of attachment and exploration: Stability and change during the years of immaturity. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR (eds) Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. Guilford, New York, pp 760–786

  33. Huston AC (1983) Sex typing. In: Mussen PH, Hetherington EM (ed) Handbook of child psychology, 4th edn. Vol. 4: Socialization, personality and social development. Wiley, New York, pp 387–467

  34. Hyde JS (1984) How large are gender differences in aggression? A developmental metanalysis. Development Psychol 20: 722–736

    Google Scholar 

  35. Keppler A, Stöcker K, Grossmann KE, Grossmann K, Winter M (2002) Kindliche Bindungserfahrungen und Repräsentation von Partnerschaften im jungen Erwachsenenalter. In: Salisch M von (Hrsg) Emotionale Kompetenz entwickeln. Grundlagen in Kindheit und Jugend. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart

  36. Kindler H (1995) Geschlechtsbezogene Aspekte der Bindungsentwicklung. In: Spangler G, Zimmermann P (Hrsg) Die Bindungstheorie. Grundlagen, Forschung und Anwendung. Klett-Kotta, Stuttgart

  37. Lewis M, Feiring C, McGuffog C, Jaskir J (1984) Predicting psychopathology in six-year-olds from early social relations. Child Dev 55: 123–136

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lindahl LB, Heimann M (2002) Social proximity in Swedish mother-daughter and mother-son interactions in infancy. J Reprod Infant Psychol 20: 37–42

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lytton H, Romney DM (1991) Parents' differential sozialization of boys and girls: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 109: 267–296

    Google Scholar 

  40. Maccoby EE (1988) Gender as a social category. Development Psychol 24: 755–765

    Google Scholar 

  41. Maccoby EE (2000) Perspectives on gender development. Int J Behav Dev 24: 398–406

    Google Scholar 

  42. Maccoby EE & Jacklin (1974) The psychology of sex differences. Stanford University Press

  43. Maccoby EE, Jacklin (1987) Gender segregation in childhood. In: Reese H (ed) Advances in child behavior and development. Academic Press, New York

  44. Main M, Kaplan N, Cassidy J (1985) Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In: Bretherton I, Waters E (eds) Growing points in attachment theory and research. Monographs Soc Res Child Dev 50: 66–106

  45. Matas L, Arend R, Sroufe LA (1978) Continuity of adaptation in the second year. The relationship between quality of attachment and later competence. Child Dev 49: 547–556

    Google Scholar 

  46. Miller JB (1986) Towards a new psychology of women. Beacon, Cambridge

  47. Parke RD, Slaby RG (1983) The Development of aggression. In: Hetherington EM, Mussen PH (ed) Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 4: Socialization, personality and social development. Wiley, New York

  48. Suess G, Grossmann KE, Sroufe LA (1992) Effects of infant attachment to mother and father on quality of adaptation in preschool: From dyadic to individual organization of self. Int J Behav Dev 15: 43–65

    Google Scholar 

  49. Turner PJ (1991) Relations between attachment, gender, and behavior with peers in preschool. Child Dev 62: 1475–1488

    Google Scholar 

  50. Van Ijzendoorn MH, Kroonenberg PM (1988) Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: a meta-analysis of the Strange Situation. Child Dev 59: 147–156

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wartner UG, Grossmann K, Fremmer-Bombik E, Suess G (1994) Attachment patterns at six in South Germany: Predictability from infancy and implications for preschool behavior. Child Dev 65: 1014–1027

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ziv Y, Aviezer O, Gini M, Sagi A, Koren-Karie N (2000) Emotional availability in the mother-infant dyad as related to the quality of infant-mother attachment relationship. Attachm Hum Dev 2: 149–169

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Keppler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keppler, A. Bindung und geschlechtsspezifische Entwicklung. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 151, 601–607 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00112-003-0703-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00112-003-0703-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation