It has been proven difficult to halt amyloid progression by liver transplantation, as the wtTTR also is amyloidogenic [5] and apparently continues to be incorporated into the fibrils even when virtually all variant TTR has been eliminated from the plasma. Such development was first discovered in heart tissue [2, 16, 17], as some patients showed a troublesome increase in cardiac amyloid load after the procedure [18]. Lately, an increase in wtATTR proportion after liver transplantation has been found also in amyloid from kidney [16], nerve [4], and adipose tissue [3] but, at least for the adipose tissue, the higher wild-type proportion was said not to be accompanied by a progression of the deposits. In the present study, we also saw an increase in wtATTR proportion after transplantation in adipose amyloid. These observations show that continued incorporation of wtTTR is not restricted to cardiac tissue; however, why the heart is especially prone to develop a progressive disease and why this is not a problem in all patients is far from understood.
Cardiac versus adipose amyloid
It is not possible to discern from earlier studies if there is a variation in wild-type proportion in amyloid from different tissue types, as these studies are rare and most often are based on only one type of tissue, a single individual, different mutations, or various purifying and analyzing techniques. The reported values are also quite diverse; 30–65% for cardiac amyloid [2, 11, 17, 30, 31], 0–35% for kidney [16, 32], 35–40% for nerve [4], and 30–50% for subcutaneous fat tissue [3].
In an attempt to learn if cardiac tissue diverges from other organs regarding the propensity to incorporate wtTTR into the amyloid fibrils, we compared the proportion wtATTR in cardiac to adipose amyloid in non-transplanted patients. The result clearly showed a higher wtATTR percentage in heart than adipose tissue, thus suggesting that cardiac amyloid is especially prone to incorporate wtTTR molecules. This could be a reason for why the heart is especially vulnerable to progression of amyloid deposits after transplantation, when only wt molecules are available.
Impact of fibril type
We have earlier reported that two compositionally and morphologically distinct fibrils are seen in patients with ATTRV30M amyloidosis [9, 12]. Interestingly, a difference in wtATTR proportion was found between the two types when heart tissue from non-transplanted patients was examined, as the fraction of wtATTR consistently was higher in fibril type A. In fact, the wild-type molecules even dominated in amount over the mutant protein in this type of fibrils, suggesting that the former molecules actually are more easily incorporated than the latter. This renders into speculations that the rate of fibril incorporation actually might be accelerated after LT, as the supply of the most easily added species thereby is increased. Even if this is not the case, wt molecules are still more easily incorporated into fibrils of type A than type B. It, therefore, seems possible that patients of type A are more susceptible than those of type B for progressive amyloid deposition in cardiac tissue after LT.
A higher content of wtATTR among patients having fibrils with fragmented ATTR was probably also found by Koike et al. [31]. They reported that fibrils with a weak and non-glittering kind of birefringence after Congo red staining had a higher wild-type percentage than fibrils with a strong and glittering birefringence, and it has been shown before that there is a strong relationship between a fibril composition with fragmented ATTR and a non-glittering appearance of the fibrils [9].
It should be noted that the relative amount of wtATTR found in the cardiac amyloid of the present study and especially the values obtained for the fragment-containing fibrils are unusually high compared to previous studies by others on ATTRV30M [2, 17] as well as other mutations [2, 11, 16, 33]. On the other hand, two of the samples used in the present study have been analyzed earlier by Edman degradation, and this technique also gave a similarly high wild-type content [30].
Amyloid turnover
Another issue raised by the results of the present study is the occurrence of turnover of the amyloid deposits. The fact that the proportion of wtATTR in transplanted patients was very high even after a fairly short time after LT, suggests that a quite rapid turnover of the deposits occurs. The amyloid amount was not assessed in this study, but as the increase in amyloid load would have to be immense to account for the massive increase in wild-type percentage, it is not likely to be the explanation. Also, follow-up reports demonstrate that the amyloid mass in adipose tissue does not seem to increase after LT, at least not to such extent [3, 22].
It can of course not be excluded that the latest added subunits also most easily detach from the amyloid, thereby producing a higher wild-type proportion than what is representative for the whole material. The lower values of wild-type proportion seen among transplanted type B patients when the tissue was treated with guanidine–HCl compared to non-treated specimens might be in line with this. On the other hand, such effect of guanidine–HCl treatment was not seen in amyloid from type A patients, which still showed an almost complete dominance of wild-type molecules.
Regardless if guanidine–HCl was used or not, a difference in proportion of wtATTR was present between the two fibril type groups among transplanted patients. The fact that a similar divergence was not seen among non-transplanted individuals is not easily interpreted, but a higher turnover rate among type A patients can perhaps be an explanation.
Fragmented versus full-length ATTR species
The V30M mutation is situated outside the C-terminal fragments, which in many cases are the main constituent of the fibrils. Therefore, a majority of the fibril components can, unfortunately, not be included in the analysis. The higher wild-type proportion seen among the fragment-containing fibrils could thus in reality be an effect of selective cleavage of the mutant molecules over the wild-type molecules. The few existing studies where the wild-type proportion is measured in both full-length ATTR and C-terminal fragments separately imply, however, that the wt proportion is similar in both species [11, 33]; however, these investigations are based on other mutations and mutational differences in cleavage propensity might exist.
In this study, we found that the wild-type proportion among the investigated fragments approximately followed the values of the full-length molecules. This implies that wt and mutant protein are equally likely to be truncated, but it should be kept in mind that it is not known if the wild-type proportion among the investigated fragments (those that contain position 30) reflects the wild-type proportion among the much more abundant C-terminal fragments.
Time point and importance of TTR fragmentation
A correlation between fibril composition and clinicopathological features has also been reported in AA-amyloidosis patients [34]. Why different types of amyloid fibrils are seen in AA and ATTRV30M amyloidosis is far from understood. Issues such as time of precursor cleavage (before or after fibril incorporation) and potential importance of fragmentation in triggering fibrillogenesis are still to be answered.
When the wt proportion was compared between full-length and fragmented ATTR in the present study, a slightly higher value among the former than the latter species was found in transplanted patients, whereas the opposite was true for non-transplanted patients. The implication of this is uncertain, but interestingly, this pattern is consistent with what would be expected if cleavage occurs after fibril incorporation. In such case, the wt proportion in transplanted patients would always be somewhat higher among full-length than fragmented species, as the most newly incorporated subunits (which after LT always will be wt molecules) would not have been cleaved yet.
However, the fact that several patients in this study had been ill for 10–17 years and still showed no sign of fragmented ATTR strongly suggests, that cleavage is not occurring after fibril incorporation in all individuals with time. Instead, variations in, for example, enzyme repertoire or amyloid fibril associated molecules (serum amyloid P component, heparan sulfate, etc.) could explain the differences between patients. Another possibility is that full-length TTR could form two structurally and morphologically distinct fibrils, where exposure of the cleavage site occurs in one of the structures but not in the other. Perhaps age-related conditions of the extracellular environment render the formation of one or the other form, which then is sustained throughout the lifetime of the individual. Structural polymorphism of amyloid-like fibrils formed from a single precursor molecule has been reported for several different proteins in vitro, for example Aß1–40 and IAPP [35], and the awareness of this phenomenon is increasing. Whether it is commonly occurring also in vivo deserves further attention.