Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

E-Zigaretten – gesundheitlich riskant und für den Rauchstopp nicht empfohlen!

E-cigarettes—Health risk and not recommended for stopping smoking

  • Leserbriefe
  • Published:
Der Internist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. BVKJ, BdP, DGAUM, DGG, DGIM, DGK, DKG, DGSMP, GPP, Nowak D et al (2015) Positionspapier der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin e. V. (DGP) zur elektronischen Zigarette (E-Zigarette). Pneumologie 69:131–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hering T (2020) E‑Zigaretten – toxikologisches Fiasko oder besser als kein Rauchstopp? Internist 6:634–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nutt DJ et al (2014) Estimating the harms of nicotine-containing products using the MCDA approach. Eur Addict Res 20:218–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McNeill A et al (2018) Evidence review of e‑cigarettes and heated tobacco products 2018. A report commissioned by Public Health England. Public Health England, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eissenberg T et al (2020) Invalidity of an oft-cited estimate of the relative harms of electronic cigarettes (Editorial). Am J Public Health 110:161–162e

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. The Lancet (2015) E‑cigarettes: Public Health England’s evidence-based confusion. Lancet 386:829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pisinger C et al (2019) A conflict of interest is strongly associated with tobacco industry-favourable results, indicating no harm of e‑cigarettes. Prev Med 119:124–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018) Public health consequences of e‑cigarettes. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chapman S (2019) The dirty dozen: twelve myths about e-cigarettes (simonchapman6.com)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gotts JE et al (2019) What are the respiratory effects of e‑cigarettes? BMJ 367:l5980

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghosh A et al (2019) Chronic e‑cigarette use increases neutrophil elastase and matrix metalloprotease levels in the lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 200:1392–1401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaumont M et al (2019) Fourth generation e‑cigarette vaping induces transient lung inflammation and gas exchange disturbances: results from two randomized clinical trials. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 316:L705–L719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chung S et al (2019) Electronic cigarette vapor with nicotine causes airway mucociliary dysfunction preferentially via TRPA1 receptors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 200:1134–1145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Buchanan ND et al (2020) Cardiovascular risk of electronic cigarettes: a review of preclinical and clinical studies. Cardiovasc Res 116:40–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kennedy CD et al (2019) The cardiovascular effects of electronic cigarettes: a systematic review of experimental studies. Prev Med 127:105770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Münzel T et al (2020) Effects of tobacco cigarettes, e‑cigarettes, and waterpipe smoking on endothelial function and clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J 0:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  17. Madison MC et al (2019) Electronic cigarettes disrupt lung lipid homeostasis and innate immunity independent of nicotine. J Clin Invest 129:4290–4304

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sussan TE et al (2015) Exposure to electronic cigarettes impairs pulmonary anti-bacterial and anti-viral defenses in a mouse model. PLoS ONE 10:e116861

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. al Tommasi Set (2019) Deregulation of biologically significant genes and associated molecular pathways in the oral epithelium of electronic cigarette users. Int J Mol Sci 20:738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fowles J et al (2020) Cancer and non-cancer risk concerns from metals in electronic cigarette liquids and aerosols. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 17:2146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang MS et al (2019) Electronic-cigarette smoke induces lung adenocarcinoma and bladder urothelial hyperplasia in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116:21727–21731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiebel FJ et al (2019) Eine unterschätzte Gefahr für Lunge und Herz-Kreislauf. Zwischenbilanz zum Weltnichtrauchertag 2019. www.aerztlicher-arbeitskreis.de>gesundheitsgefahren_durch_e-zigaretten

  23. Bals R et al (2019) Electronic cigarettes: a task force report from the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 68:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bozier J et al (2020) The evolving landscape of e‑cigarettes. A systematic review of recent evidence. Chest 157:1362–1390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. European Respiratory Society, Tobacco Control Committee (2019) Positionspapier zur Tabak-Harm-Reduction (übersetzt von DGP)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ludicke F et al (2019) Effects of switching to a heat-not-burn tobacco product on biologically relevant biomarkers to assess a candidate modified risk tobacco product: a randomized trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 28:1934–1943

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Simonavicius E et al (2019) Heat-not-burn tobacco products: a systematic literature review. Tob Control 28:582–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Adriaens K et al (2018) IQOS(TM) vs-e-cigarette: a direct comparison of short-term effects after overnight-abstinence. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:2902

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. BfR (2017) Vorläufige Risikobewertung von Tobacco Heating-Systemen als Tabakprodukte – Mitteilung Nr. 015/2017 des BfR vom Juli 2017. https://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/343/vorlaeufige-risikobewertung-von-tobacco-heating-systemen-als-tabakprodukte.pdf. Zugegriffen: 6. Juli 2020

  30. Biondi-Zoccai G et al (2019) Acute effects of heat-not-burn, electronic vaping, and traditional tobacco combustion cigarettes: the Sapienza University of Rome-Vascular Assessment of Proatherosclerotic Effects of Smoking ( SUR – VAPES ) 2 Randomized Trial. J Am Heart Assoc 8:e10455. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010455

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Nabavizadeh P et al (2018) Vascular endothelial function is impaired by aerosol from a single IQOS HeatStick to the same extent as by cigarette smoke. Tob Control 27(Suppl 1):s13–s19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hajek P et al (2019) A randomized trial of e‑cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy. N Engl J Med 380:629–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hanewinkel H (2019) Kommentar zu „Raucherentwöhnung: E‑Zigarette besser als klassische Nikotinersatzpräparate?“. Pneumologie 73:337

    Google Scholar 

  34. Martínez U et al (2020) How does smoking and nicotine dependence change after onset of vaping? A retrospective analysis of dual users. Nicotine Tob Res 22:764–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Glantz SA, Bareham DW (2018) E‑cigarettes: use, effects on smoking, risks, and policy implications. Annu Rev Public Health 39:215–235

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Morgenstern M et al (2018) E‑cigarettes and the use of conventional cigarettes. Dtsch Arztebl Int 115:243–248

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hansen J et al (2020) E‑Zigarettenkonsum und späterer Konsum konventioneller Zigaretten. Pneumologie 74:39–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (2020) Ausgewählte Ergebnisse der Studie „Die Drogenaffinität Jugendlicher in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2019“. Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung, Köln

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin e. V. (DGP), Robert-Koch-Platz 9, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland

    Michael Pfeifer

Authors
  1. Michael Pfeifer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Pfeifer.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

M. Pfeifer gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pfeifer, M. E-Zigaretten – gesundheitlich riskant und für den Rauchstopp nicht empfohlen!. Internist 61, 1106–1108 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-020-00856-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-020-00856-3

Search

Navigation