Skip to main content
Log in

Therapiewandel nach Schlaganfall bei Patienten mit offenem Foramen ovale?

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulants versus Antiplatelet Therapy to Prevent Stroke Recurrence Trial (CLOSE), Randomized Evaluation of Recurrent Stroke Comparing PFO Closure to Established Current Standard of Care Treatment (RESPECT) und Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (REDUCE)

Therapy changes after stroke in patients with open foramen ovale?

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulants versus Antiplatelet Therapy to Prevent Stroke Recurrence Trial (CLOSE), Randomized Evaluation of Recurrent Stroke Comparing PFO Closure to Established Current Standard of Care Treatment (RESPECT), and Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (REDUCE)

  • Klinische Studien
  • Published:
Der Internist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Di Tullio MR, Sacco RL, Sciacca RR et al (2007) Patent foramen ovale and the risk of ischemic stroke in a multiethnic population. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:797–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mas JL, Derumeaux G, Guillon B et al (2017) Patent foramen ovale closure or anticoagulation vs. antiplatelets after stroke. N Engl J Med 377:1011–1021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saver JL, Carroll JD, Thaler DE et al (2017) Long-term outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after stroke. N Engl J Med 377:1022–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sondergaard L, Kasner SE, Rhodes JF et al (2017) Patent foramen ovale closure or Antiplatelet therapy for cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 377:1033–1042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Bauer.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Bauer und S. Nitschmann geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

M. Hallek, Köln

W. Lehmacher, Köln

N. Marx, Aachen

U. Müller-Ladner, Bad Nauheim

H. Wedemeyer, Hannover

M. Wehling, Mannheim

T.R. Weihrauch, Düsseldorf

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bauer, A., Nitschmann, S. Therapiewandel nach Schlaganfall bei Patienten mit offenem Foramen ovale?. Internist 59, 213–216 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-017-0369-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-017-0369-y

Navigation