Skip to main content
Log in

Klug-entscheiden-Empfehlungen in der Nephrologie

Choosing wisely recommendations in nephrology

  • Schwerpunkt: Klug entscheiden
  • Published:
Der Internist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin (DGIM) hat die Initiative Klug entscheiden ins Leben gerufen, um diagnostische und therapeutische Maßnahmen zu adressieren, die häufig nicht fachgerecht eingesetzt werden, sei es im Sinne einer Über-, Unter- oder Fehlversorgung. Die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nephrologie (DGfN) unterstützt die Initiative nachdrücklich und hat fünf Positiv- und fünf Negativempfehlungen beigesteuert. Diese zehn Empfehlungen werden im vorliegenden Beitrag erörtert. Die Positivempfehlungen setzen einen Schwerpunkt auf die Früherkennung von Nierenerkrankungen mit einfachen Blut- und Urintests, den Einsatz von Röntgenkontrastmitteln bei eingeschränkter Nierenfunktion sowie die Problematik zu geringer Impfraten. Die Negativempfehlungen setzen mit drei Empfehlungen einen Schwerpunkt auf das Thema Flüssigkeitszufuhr und Diuretika. Die übrigen zwei Negativempfehlungen betreffen die Angioplastie bei Nierenarterienstenose und den unreflektierten Einsatz nichtsteroidaler Antiphlogistika.

Abstract

The German Society of Internal Medicine (“Deutsche Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin”, DGIM) founded the Choosing wisely initiative in order to address diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that are frequently inappropriately applied, whether this be in terms of over-, under-, or misuse of health services. The German Society of Nephrology (“Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nephrologie,” DGfN) strongly supports the initiative and has contributed five positive and five negative recommendations. These ten recommendations are discussed in the current publication. The positive recommendations reflect the importance of early recognition of renal disease via simple blood and urine tests, the use of radiocontrast media in cases of impaired renal function, as well as the problems associated with low vaccination rates. Three of the negative recommendations are focused on hydration and diuretics. The remaining two negative recommendations concern angioplasty in cases of renal artery stenosis and the unconsidered use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Galle J, Floegge J (2016) KLUG ENTSCHEIDEN: . . . in der Nephrologie. Dtsch Arztebl 113(35–36):A-1534/B-1293/C-1273

    Google Scholar 

  2. KDIGO (2013) 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int Suppl 3:1–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasegawa T, Bragg-Gresham JL, Yamazaki S, Fukuhara S, Akizawa T, Kleophas W, Greenwood R, Pisoni RL (2009) Greater first-year survival on hemodialysis in facilities in which patients are provided earlier and more frequent pre-nephrology visits. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:595–602

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Girndt M, Trocchi P, Scheidt-Nave C, Markau S, Stang A (2016) The prevalence of renal failure. Dtsch Arztebl Int 113:85–91

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsushita K, Coresh J, Sang Y, Chalmers J, Fox C, Guallar E, Jafar T, Jassal SK, Landman GW, Muntner P, Roderick P, Sairenchi T, Schottker B, Shankar A, Shlipak M, Tonelli M, Townend J, van Zuilen A, Yamagishi K, Yamashita K, Gansevoort R, Sarnak M, Warnock DG, Woodward M, Arnlov J (2015) Estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria for prediction of cardiovascular outcomes: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 3:514–525

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D (1999) A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med 130:461–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF III, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, Coresh J (2009) A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150:604–612

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Levin A, Bakris GL, Molitch M, Smulders M, Tian J, Williams LA, Andress DL (2007) Prevalence of abnormal serum vitamin D, PTH, calcium, and phosphorus in patients with chronic kidney disease: Results of the study to evaluate early kidney disease. Kidney Int 71:31–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moranne O, Froissart M, Rossert J, Gauci C, Boffa JJ, Haymann JP, M’rad MB, Jacquot C, Houillier P, Stengel B, Fouqueray B (2009) Timing of onset of CKD-related metabolic complications. J Am Soc Nephrol 20:164–171

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Vassalotti JA, Uribarri J, Chen SC, Li S, Wang C, Collins AJ, Calvo MS, Whaley-Connell AT, McCullough PA, Norris KC (2008) Trends in mineral metabolism: Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2004. Am J Kidney Dis 51:S56–S68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stevens LA, Djurdjev O, Cardew S, Cameron EC, Levin A (2004) Calcium, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone levels in combination and as a function of dialysis duration predict mortality: evidence for the complexity of the association between mineral metabolism and outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:770–779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shlipak MG, Heidenreich PA, Noguchi H, Chertow GM, Browner WS, McClellan MB (2002) Association of renal insufficiency with treatment and outcomes after myocardial infarction in elderly patients. Ann Intern Med 137:555–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Newhouse JH, Kho D, Rao QA, Starren J (2008) Frequency of serum creatinine changes in the absence of iodinated contrast material: implications for studies of contrast nephrotoxicity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:376–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cely CM, Schein RM, Quartin AA (2012) Risk of contrast induced nephropathy in the critically ill: a prospective, case matched study. Crit Care 16:R67

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Baumgarten DA, Ellis JH (2008) Contrast-induced nephropathy: contrast material not required? AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:383–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Katzberg RW, Newhouse JH (2010) Intravenous contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity: is the medical risk really as great as we have come to believe? Radiology 256:21–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davenport MS, Cohan RH, Ellis JH (2015) Contrast media controversies in 2015: imaging patients with renal impairment or risk of contrast reaction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:1174–1181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thomsen HS, Stacul F (2014) CIN: can we forget it? Acta Radiol 55:1027–1030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kausz A, Pahari D (2004) The value of vaccination in chronic kidney disease. Semin Dial 17:9–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wiese-Posselt M, Tertilt C, Zepp F (2011) Vaccination recommendations for Germany. Dtsch Arztebl Int 108:771–779

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. National Kidney Foundation (2016) Which vaccinations do I need? A guide for adults with chronic kidney disease or kidney failure living on dialysis or with a kidney transplant. https://www.kidney.org/atoz/content/vaccinations. Zugegriffen: Februar 2017

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group (2009) KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 9(Suppl 3):S1–155

    Google Scholar 

  23. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/

  24. Palmer SC, Wong G, Iff S, Yang J, Jayaswal V, Craig JC, Rochtchina E, Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Strippoli GF (2014) Fluid intake and all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and kidney function: a population-based longitudinal cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 29:1377–1384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grams ME, Estrella MM, Coresh J, Brower RG, Liu KD (2011) Fluid balance, diuretic use, and mortality in acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6:966–973

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Payen D, de Pont AC, Sakr Y, Spies C, Reinhart K, Vincent JL (2008) A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure. Crit Care 12:R74

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bouchard J, Soroko SB, Chertow GM, Himmelfarb J, Ikizler TA, Paganini EP, Mehta RL (2009) Fluid accumulation, survival and recovery of kidney function in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 76:422–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cantarovich F, Rangoonwala B, Lorenz H, Verho M, Esnault VL (2004) High-dose furosemide for established ARF: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Am J Kidney Dis 44:402–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Karajala V, Mansour W, Kellum JA (2009) Diuretics in acute kidney injury. minerva Anestesiol 75:251–257

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Arbel Y, Assa BE, Halkin A, Keren G, Schwartz AL, Havakuk O, Leshem-Rubinow E, Konigstein M, Steinvil A, Abramowitz Y, Finkelstein A, Banai S (2014) Forced diuresis with matched hydration in reducing acute kidney injury during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (Reduce-AKI): study protocol for a randomized sham-controlled trial. Trials 15:262

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ho KM, Power BM (2010) Benefits and risks of furosemide in acute kidney injury. Anaesthesia 65:283–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kellum JA, Lameire N (2013) Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1). Crit Care 17:204

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bagshaw SM, Gibney RT, McAlister FA, Bellomo R (2010) The SPARK Study: a phase II randomized blinded controlled trial of the effect of furosemide in critically ill patients with early acute kidney injury. Trials 11:50

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wheatley K, Ives N, Gray R, Kalra PA, Moss JG, Baigent C, Carr S, Chalmers N, Eadington D, Hamilton G, Lipkin G, Nicholson A, Scoble J (2009) Revascularization versus medical therapy for renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 361:1953–1962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cooper CJ, Murphy TP, Cutlip DE, Jamerson K, Henrich W, Reid DM, Cohen DJ, Matsumoto AH, Steffes M, Jaff MR, Prince MR, Lewis EF, Tuttle KR, Shapiro JI, Rundback JH, Massaro JM, D’Agostino RB Sr., Dworkin LD (2014) Stenting and medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 370:13–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Raman G, Adam GP, Halladay CW, Langberg VN, Azodo IA, Balk EM (2016) Comparative effectiveness of management strategies for renal artery stenosis: An updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 165:635–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ritchie J, Alderson HV, Kalra PA (2014) Where now in the management of renal artery stenosis? Implications of the ASTRAL and CORAL trials. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 23:525–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rahman S, Malcoun A (2014) Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase-2, and the kidneys. Prim Care 41:803–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gurwitz JH, Avorn J, Bohn RL, Glynn RJ, Monane M, Mogun H (1994) Initiation of antihypertensive treatment during nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy. JAMA 272:781–786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kalafutova S, Juraskova B, Vlcek J (2014) The impact of combinations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anti-hypertensive agents on blood pressure. Adv Clin Exp Med 23:993–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Galle.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

J. Galle und J. Floege geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

U.R. Fölsch, Kiel

M. Hallek, Köln

G. Hasenfuß, Göttingen

E. Märker-Hermann, Wiesbaden

C.C. Sieber, Nürnberg

Teile dieses Beitrags wurden bereits veröffentlicht in Galle J, Floege J (2016) Klug entscheiden … in der Nephrologie. Dtsch Arztebl 113(35–36)

J. Galle und J. Floege für die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nephrologie (DGfN).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galle, J., Floege, J. Klug-entscheiden-Empfehlungen in der Nephrologie. Internist 58, 568–574 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-017-0248-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-017-0248-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation