Literatur
Bainey KR, Mehta SR, Lai T, Welsh RC (2014) Complete vs culprit-only revascularization for patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J 167:1–14.e2
Hannan E, Samadashvili Z, Walford G et al (2010) Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:22–31
Parodi G, Memisha G, Valenti R et al (2005) Five year outcome after primary coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from a single centre experience. Heart 91:1541–1544
Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ et al (2011) A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 364:226–235
Toma M, Buller CE, Westerhout CM et al (2010) Non-culprit coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention during acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the APEX-AMI trial. Eur Heart J 31:1701–1707
Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien
Interessenkonflikt. P. Kahlert und S. Nitschmann geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kahlert, P., Nitschmann, S. Präventive Angioplastie beim Myokardinfarkt. Internist 55, 1228–1230 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-014-3585-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-014-3585-8