Abstract
Coppicing, a well-studied forestry management system, offers significant productivity and economic benefits to plantations. This study aimed to assess the growth and wood quality differences in ten Eucalyptus genotypes, for example, E. grandis x E. urophylla (G3, G4, G5, G6, G8, G10, and G13), E. urophylla (G12), E. saligna (G14), and E. grandis x E. camaldulensis (G16) at three years old under high stem and coppice regimes, considering stem quantity variations. Six trees per clone were sampled in both regimes, with coppice trees having either one or two stems. Various wood and bark properties, including basic density, biomass estimation, pith eccentricity, and heartwood percentage were evaluated. Clone G12 showed the highest increment average volume among the treatments, while clones G14 and G16 had the lowest performances across all management regimes. Under high stem and coppice management, the clones show basic wood density ranging from 485 to 393 kg m-3 and 482 to 405 kg m-3, respectively. Generally, trees grown under the coppice regime produced more heartwood. Under the two-stem coppice regime, 90% of the clones showed greater pith eccentricity in their basal discs. Pith eccentricity varied significantly among clones, with coppice (especially with two stems) showing greater eccentricity compared to high stem management. Overall, wood properties did not significantly differ between high stem and coppice management for the evaluated Eucalyptus clones at three years old, except for pith eccentricity, which favored coppice with two stems. This study highlights the potential benefits of coppicing for specific wood quality traits in Eucalyptus plantations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Almeida MNF, Vidaurre GB, Pezzopane JEM et al (2020) Heartwood variation of Eucalyptus urophylla is influenced by climatic conditions. For Ecol Manag 458:117743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117743
Almeida MNF, de Toledo Picoli EA, Moulin JC et al (2022) Wood properties as potential biomarkers of tolerance to physiological disorders: comparison of divergent eucalyptus genotypes. Scientia Forestalis 50:1–14. https://doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v50.22
Almeida MNF, Vidaurre GB, Louzada JLPC et al (2023) Wood density variations of E. urophylla clone among growth sites are related to climate. Can J for Res 53(5):343–353. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2022-003
Alves ICN, Gomide JL, Colodette JL et al (2011) Technological characterization of Eucalyptus Benthamii wood for kraft cellulose production. Ciência Florestal 21:167–174. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050982759
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS – ABNT (2003) NBR 11941: wood - determination of basic density. Rio de Janeiro
Barros KLC, Macedo RLG, Venturin N (2017) Capacidade De brotação de teca sob regime de Talhadia composta. (Teak Stump Sprouting Capacity Under Compound Coppice Regime). ProcessFloresta E Ambiente 24:e00134315. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.134315
Brito AS, Vidaurre GB, Oliveira JTS et al (2019) Effect of planting spacing in production and permeability of heartwood and sapwood of Eucalyptus wood. Floresta Ambiente 26:e20180378. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.037818
Castro AFNM, Castro RVO, Carneiro ADCO et al (2016) Correlations between age, wood quality and charcoal quality of Eucalyptus clones. Revista Árvore 40:551–560. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-67622016000300019
Cherelli SG, Sartori MMP, Próspero AG, Ballarin AW (2018) Heartwood and sapwood in Eucalyptus trees: nonconventional approach to wood quality. Acad Bras Ciênc 90:425–438. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201820160195
Dou J, Niemelä K, Haatainen T, Tervola P, Vehmaa J (2023) Investigation of pitch deposits throughout the fiber line of softwood pulp mill. J Clean Prod 405:136940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136940
Eloy E, Silva DAD, Caron BO, Elli EF, Schwerz F (2018) Effect of age and spacing on biomass production in forest plantations. Revista Árvore 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-90882018000200014
Fontenele NM (2016) Comparison between productivity and economic analysis of Eucalyptus spp. clones in high-stem and coppice systems in the Araripe plaster complex – PE. Dissertation, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
Gomide JL, Colodette JL, Oliveira RCD, Silva CM (2005) Technological characterization, for cellulose production, of the new generation of Eucalyptus clones from Brazil. Revista Árvore 29:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622005000100014
Gominho J, Pereira H (2005) The influence of tree spacing in heartwood content in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Wood Fiber Sci 37:582–590
Gonçalves FG, Oliveira JTDS, Lucia RMD, Sartório RC (2009) Study of some mechanical properties of wood from a clonal hybrid of Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus Grandis. Revista Árvore 33:501–509. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622009000300012
Gonçalves JLM, Alvares CA, Higa AR et al (2013) Integrating genetic and silvicultural strategies to minimize abiotic and biotic constraints in Brazilian eucalypt plantations. For Ecol Manag 301:6–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.030
Gonçalves JLM, Alvares CA, Behling M et al (2014) Produtividade De plantações de eucalipto manejadas nos sistemas de alto fuste e talhadia, em função de fatores edafoclimáticos. (Productivity of eucalypt plantations managed under high forest and coppice systems, depending on edaphoclimatic factors). Scientia Forestalis 42(103):411–419
Gonçalves JLM, Alvares CA, Rocha JH, Brandani CB, Hakamada R (2017) Eucalypt plantation management in regions with water stress. South Forests: J for Sci 79(3):169–183. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2016.1255415
Hakamada RE, Lemos CCZD, Batistuzzo GZB et al (2015) Use of the forest inventory to identify silvicultural and environmental factors that affect the productivity of Eucalyptus managed under coppice. Série Técnica IPEF 21(42):58–64
Hakamada RE, Moreira GG, Fernandes PG, Martins SDS (2022) Legacy of harvesting methods on coppice-rotation Eucalyptus at experimental and operational scales. Trees Forests People 9:100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100293
Hardiyanto EB, Inail MA, Mendham DS, Thaher E, Sitorus BK (2022) Eucalyptus pellita coppice vs. seedlings as a re-establishment method in South Sumatra. Indonesia Forests 13(7):1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071017
Harwood C (2011) New introduction doing it right. In: Walter J (ed) Developing a eucalypt resource: learning from Australia and elsewhere. Wood Technology Research Centre, ChristChurch, New Zealand, pp 43–54
IBÁ (2023) Instituto Brasileiro De Árvores - Report IBÁ 2023. Indústria Brasileira de Árvores, São Paulo
Lima IL, Garcia JN, Stape JL (2007) Influence of thinning and fertilization on pith displacement and log end cracks in Eucalyptus grandis Hill Ex-maiden. Cerne 13(2):170–177
Melo AB (2022) Productivity and quality of wood from Corymbia and Eucalyptus species in two sites in Brazil. Dissertation, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
Nabais C, Hansen JK, David-Schwartz R, Klisz M, López R, Rozenberg P (2018) The effect of climate on wood density: what provenance trials tell us? For Ecol Manag 408:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.040
Nicolescu VN, Carvalho J, Hochbichler E, Bruckman V, Piqué-Nicolau M, Hernea C, Viana H, Štochlová P, Ertekin M, Tijardovic M, Dubravac T, Vandekerkhove K, Kofman PD, Rossney D, Unrau A (2017) Silvicultural guidelines for European coppice forests. COST action FP1301 reports. Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12193.10081
Pavan BE, Amaral RG, Pupin S et al (2021) Competitive ability among Eucalyptus spp. commercial clones in Mato Grosso do sul state. For Ecol Manag 494:119297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119297
.Pfautsch S, Harbusch M, Wesolowski A et al (2016) Climate determines vascular traits in the ecologically diverse genus Eucalyptus. Ecol Lett 19:240–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12559
Plomion C, Leprovost G, Stokes A (2001) Wood formation in trees. Plant Physiol 127:1513–1523. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010816
Poersch NL, França Filho LRT, Miguel EP, Cruz GHM, Francisquette KL, Cavalheiro SB (2017) Influence of climate variables in the initial growth of Corymbia citriodora and different species of eucalyptus. Bioscience J 33(6):1452–1464
R CORE TEAM (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Ramalho FMG, Pimenta EM, Goulart CP et al (2019) Effect of stand density on longitudinal variation of wood and bark growth in fast-growing Eucalyptus plantations. iForest-Biogeosciences Forestry 12(6):527–532. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3082-012
Reis GG, Reis MDGF (1997) Fisiologia Da brotação de eucalipto com ênfase nas suas relações hídricas. (hysiology of eucalyptus sprouting with emphasis on water relations) Série técnica IPEF 11(30):9–22
Ritter M (2014) Field guide to the cultivated eucalypts (Myrtaceae) and how to identify them. Annual Missouri Botanic Garden 99(4):642–687. https://doi.org/10.3417/2012039
Rocha SM (2022) Wood quality of hybrid clones of Corymbia torelliana and Corymbia citriodora for steelmaking charcoal production. Thesis, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
Rocha MFV, Vital BR, De Carneiro ACO et al (2016) Effects of plant spacing on the physical, chemical and energy properties of Eucalyptus wood and bark. J Trop for Sci 28(3):243–248
Rocha MFV, Pereira BLC, Oliveira AC et al (2018) Influence of plant spacing on the bark properties of a Eucalyptus clone. Revista Árvore 42(5):e420501. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-90882018000500001
Rocha JHT, Wenzel AV, Melo EA et al (2019) Responses of coppiced Eucalyptus to macro-and micronutrient application. New Forest 50:717–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-09695-5
Rocha SMG, Vidaurre GB, Pezzopane JEM et al (2020) Influence of climatic variations on production, biomass and density of wood in Eucalyptus clones of different species. For Ecol Manag 473:118290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118290
Santos LMH, Almeida MNFD, Silva JGMD et al (2021) Variations in heartwood formation and wood density as a function of age and plant spacing in a fast-growing Eucalyptus plantation. Holzforschung 75(11):979–988. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2020-0215
Silva DA, Trugilho PF (2003) Dimensional behavior of the wood of sapwood and heartwood for analysis of image submitted in different temperatures. Cerne 9(1):056–065
Silva CL, Roldão BDC, Santos LDT, Hein PRG (2017) Eucalyptus and Acacia wood and bark in monospecific and intercropped plantations. Floresta E Ambiente 25(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.081914
Silva NFD, Barros NFD, Neves JCL, Schulthais F, Novais RFD, Mattiello EM (2020) Yield and nutrient demand and efficiency of eucalyptus under coppicing regime. Forests 11(8):852. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080852
Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Agriculture Handbook Number 436. Washington, DC, pp 886
Thomas DS, Montagu KD, Conroy JP (2007) Temperature effects on wood anatomy, wood density, photosynthesis and biomass partitioning of Eucalyptus grandis seedlings. Tree Physiol 27:251–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/27.2.251
Tomazello M, Brazolin S, Chagas MP et al (2008) Application of X-ray technique in nondestructive evaluation of eucalypt wood. Maderas Cienc Tecnol 10:139–149. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-221X2008000200006
Valle MLA, Silva JDC, Lucia RMD, Evangelista WV (2013) Retention and penetration of CCA in first and second rotation of Eucalyptus urophylla ST Blake wood. Ciência Florestal 23:481–490. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050989292
Vidaurre GB, Silva JGM, Moulin JC, Carneiro ACO (2020) Qualidade Da Madeira De eucalipto proveniente de plantações no Brasil. (Quality of eucalyptus wood from plantations in Brazil). EdUfes, Vitória
Visser H, van der Maaten-Theunissen M, van der Maaten E (2023) BAI BAI bias–An evaluation of uncertainties in calculating basal area increments from cores. Dendrochronologia 78:126066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2023.126066
Vital BR (1984) Methods for determining wood density. Viçosa MG: SIF, 501
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Wood Quality Research Center (NUQMAD) at the Federal University of Espírito Santo, in Brazil, to the EUCFLUX Cooperative Program of the Institute for Forestry Research and Studies – IPEF, to Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Finance Code 001, and to Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo (FAPES) for the financial assistance, which allowed us to conduct this research.
Funding
This research was funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Finance Code 001, and by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo (FAPES).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Nauan Ribeiro Marques Cirilo: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing; Maria Naruna Félix de Almeida: Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing - Review & Editing; Vaniele Bento dos Santos: Data curation, Methodology; Aguinaldo Jose de Souza: Validation; Gustavo Jaske da Conceição: Data curation; João Gabriel Missia da Silva: Methodology, Supervision; Luana Bento Protázio: Formal analysis; Bruno Sangali Arantes: Formal analysis; Otavio Camargo Campoe: Conceptualization; Rodrigo Eiji Hakamada: Supervision; Pedro Nicó de Medeiros Neto: Supervision; Thayanne Caroline Castor Neto: Writing - Review & Editing; Joannès Guillemot: Conceptualization; Graziela Baptista Vidaurre: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing - Review & Editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cirilo, N.R.M., de Almeida, M.N.F., dos Santos, V.B. et al. Impact of coppice and high stem management on Eucalyptus wood quality. Eur. J. Wood Prod. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-024-02125-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-024-02125-8