Skip to main content

Assessment of sound quality: Australian native hardwood species for guitar fretboard production

Abstract

Rosewood species are used around the world in musical instrument component manufacture, most commonly for the use as the guitar fretboard. Due to the overuse of these species, rosewood has been declared an endangered wood necessitating alternatives to be sourced with similar desirable characteristics. Dynamic testing was performed on Australian high-density hardwood species with a density range of 480–943 kg/m3; the results were used for comparison with commercial Indian rosewood (IRW), used in guitar manufacturing for fretboard production. The anatomical features of the tested species were determined using microscopic imaging while dynamic testing was conducted using non-destructive, acoustic analysis. The anatomical features determined showed that certain Australian hardwood species have a strong correlation with the commercial species used for wooden instrument manufacture including frame board and soundboard production. The majority of species tested had solitary or multiple vessel type, vasicentric parenchyma and uniform ray types. The internal friction versus the specific dynamic modulus for the species tested were in a similar range of the IRW samples. The quality factor versus temporal damping of species tested showed potential similarities between the species IRW, with red siris (RSI), and red tea tree (RTT). From the study conducted, four species including: RTT, RSI, Queensland walnut (QLW) and Calophyllum (PTG) have been selected for further testing and fretboard prototyping; the selected species will be tested for quality of sound and strength in the manufactured prototypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Abbreviations

Q:

Quality factor

E:

Elastic modulus

L:

Longitudinal

R:

Radial

T:

Tangential

f:

Frequency

\(\alpha_{n}\) :

Temporal damping

\(tan\delta\) :

Internal friction

A:

Amplitude

Pn:

Solution of Bernoulli (rank n)

\(I_{GZ}\) :

Moment of inertia (GZ)

ACE:

Acoustic conversion efficiency

Z:

Characteristic impedance

R:

Radiation ratio

ρ:

Density

c:

Speed of a compressional wave propagating in longitudinal direction of wood

cQ:

Transmission

ρ/c:

Anti-vibrational parameter

E/ρ:

Specific dynamic modulus

References

  • Alves ES, Longui EL, Amano E (2008) Pernambuco wood (Caesalpinia echinata) used in the manufacture of bows for string instruments. Iawa J 29(3):323–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aramaki M, Baillères H, Brancheriau L, Kronland-Martinet R, Ystad S (2007) Sound quality assessment of wood for xylophone bars. J Acoust Soc Am 121(4):2407–2420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baar J, Tippner J, Gryc V (2016) Wood anatomy and acoustic properties of selected tropical hardwoods. IAWA J 37(1):69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajpai P (2018) Biermann’s Handbook of Pulp and Paper: vol 1. Raw Material and Pulp Making, Elsevier

  • Bond B (2002) Wood identification for hardwood and softwood species native to Tennessee, Agricultural Extension Service, University of Tennessee

  • Bootle KR (1983) Wood in Australia. Types, properties and uses. Sydney, Australia McGraw-Hill book company

  • Brancheriau L, Baillères H (2002) Natural vibration analysis of clear wooden beams: a theoretical review. Wood Sci Technol 36(4):347–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brancheriau L, Baillères H, Détienne P, Gril J, Kronland R (2006a) Key signal and wood anatomy parameters related to the acoustic quality of wood for xylophone-type percussion instruments. J Wood Sci 52(3):270–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brancheriau L, Baillères H, Détienne P, Kronland R, Metzger B (2006b) Classifying xylophone bar materials by perceptual, signal processing and wood anatomy analysis. Ann For Sci 63(1):73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brémaud I (2012) Acoustical properties of wood in string instruments soundboards and tuned idiophones: biological and cultural diversity. J Acoust Soc Am 131(1):807–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brémaud I, El Kaïm Y, Guibal D, Minato K, Thibaut B, Gril J (2012) Characterisation and categorisation of the diversity in viscoelastic vibrational properties between 98 wood types. Ann For Sci 69(3):373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucur V (1980) Anatomical structure and some acoustical properties of resonance wood. Catgut Acoust Soc Newsl 33:24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucur V, Chivers RC (1991) Acoustic properties and anisotropy of some Australian wood species. ACUSTICA 75(1991):69–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucur V, Lanceleur P, Roge B (2002) Acoustic properties of wood in tridimensional representation of slowness surfaces. Ultrasonics 40(1–8):537–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist S (2013) Comparative wood anatomy: systematic, ecological, and evolutionary aspects of dicotyledon wood. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Clowes A (2016) Building a sustainable guitar: rosewood. World Resources Institute

  • Gibson C, Warren A (2016) Resource-sensitive global production networks: reconfigured geographies of timber and acoustic guitar manufacturing. Econ Geogr 92(4):430–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson C, Warren A (2018) Unintentional path dependence: Australian guitar manufacturing, bunya pine and legacies of forestry decisions and resource stewardship. Aust Geogr 49(1):61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen H (2006). Acoustic studies on wood. Masters of Forestry Science University of Canterbury

  • Hassan KT, Tippner J (2019) Acoustic properties assessment of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) wood from trees irrigated with secondarily treated wastewater. BioResources 14(2):2919–2930

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoadley RB (2000) Understanding wood: a craftsman’s guide to wood technology. Taunton Press, Newtown

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilic J (1990) The CSIRO macro key for hardwood identification. CSIRO Division of Forestery and Forest Products, Highett

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmens RHMJ (2008) Dalbergia latifolia (PROTA), Roxb. In: Louppe D, Oteng-Amoako AA, Brink M (eds) PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa/Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale), Wageningen, Netherlands

  • Meier E (2015) The wood database-hardwood anatomy. Wood Database 272

  • Obataya E, Ono T, Norimoto M (2000) Vibrational properties of wood along the grain. J Mater Sci 35(12):2993–3001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ono T, Norimoto M (1983) Study on Young’s modulus and internal friction of wood in relation to the evaluation of wood for musical instruments. Jpn J Appl Phys 22(4R):611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedik Y, Hamdan S, Jusoh I, Hasan M (2010) Acoustic properties of selected tropical wood species. J Nondestr Eval 29(1):38–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirmohammadi M, Faircloth A, Redman A (2020) Determining acoustic properties of Australian native hardwood species—a comparison with Indian Rosewood properties for guitar fretboard production. Eur J Wood Prod 78(6):1161–1171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sproßmann R, Zauer M, Wagenführ A (2017) Characterization of acoustic and mechanical properties of common tropical woods used in classical guitars. Results Phys 7:1737–1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traore B, Brancheriau L, Perre P, Stevanovic T, Diouf P (2010) Acoustic quality of vène wood (Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir.) for xylophone instrument manufacture in Mali. Ann For Sci 67(2010):815–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner R (2017) Guitar Tone Woods, SoundUnlimited. https://www.soundunlimited.co.uk/articles/guitar_tone_woods 2019

  • Venn TJ, Whittaker K (2003) Potential specialty timber markets for hardwoods of Western Queensland, Australia. Small-scale For 2:377–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-003-0026-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegst UGK (2006) Wood for sound. Am J Bot 10(93):1439–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegst UGK (2008) Bamboo and wood in musical instruments. Ann Rev Mater Res 38:323–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler EA, Baas P, Gasson PE (1989) IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification. IAWA. 112 pp

  • Wood Reference Collection. Q. Government. Department of Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry Science (2019). The Maton custom shop. https://maton.com.au/product/maton-custom

  • Yoshikawa S, Waltham C (2014) Woods for wooden musical instruments. ISMA 2014, Le Mans, France, pp 281–286

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors of this paper would like to acknowledge the great contribution of Mr Merv Waters from BRANCH95 for providing the species for testing and Mr Patrick Evans from Maton’s Guitar for his great contribution in evaluating the boards using industry’s benchmark for sound quality parameters and Mr Peter Bernoth from The Plutonium Studio for providing access to the anechoic room for testing. The project was a part of Australian component of ACIAR project titled: “Enhancing key elements of the value chains for plantation-grown wood in Lao PDR”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryam Shirmohammadi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1107 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shirmohammadi, M., Faircloth, A. & Redman, A. Assessment of sound quality: Australian native hardwood species for guitar fretboard production. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 79, 487–497 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01631-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01631-9