Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preferences of furniture manufacturers for using lightweight wood-based panels as eco-friendly products

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lightweight panels, as an eco-friendly element for furniture manufacturing, offer several potential market and production opportunities for many secondary woodworking companies. In this study, the perceptions of Iranian furniture manufacturers were evaluated by means of ANP-based multi-type questionnaires, regarding the conditions and requisite features of lightweight panels in furniture manufacturing. The ANP results revealed that product design, quality and price were effective sub-criteria for furniture manufacturers. The most important attributes for choosing panels during the manufacturing process were: lack of panel warping, product abundance in the market, and withdrawal resistance of connectors. Manufacturers indicated that they were aware of the advantages lightweight panels would bring them, but they were still in need of further persuasion concerning the quality and workability of lightweight panels. Combining lightweight and conventional panels for furniture manufacturing could lead to an increased interest in assuring furniture quality. In addition, further development of lightweight panels is necessary to increase the variation in the market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azizi M, Mohebbi N, De Felice F (2016) Evaluation of sustainable development of wooden furniture industry using multi criteria decision making method. Agric Agric Sci procedia 8:387–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Azizi M, Sarfi F, Faezipour M, Arian A (2014) A comparative model of kinds of composite wood regarding customers’ perspective using analytic network process (ANP). Int J Multicriteria Decis Mak 4(4):367–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Benthien JT, Ohlmeyer M (2017) Influence of face-to-core layer ratio and core layer resin content on the properties of density-decreased particleboards. Eur J Wood Prod 75(1):55–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-016-1059-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumgardner M, Buehlmann U, Forth K (2009) Perception of lightweight panels by US manufacturers. Paper presented at the In: Fischer, Kurt, ed. Technical Conference Management-Pan American laminates conference and work shop; 2009 December 3–4; Toronto, Canada. Langenzersdorf, Austria: Technical Conference Management: 65–69

  • Burnett MP, Kharazipour A (2017) Mechanical behaviour of a lightweight, three-layered sandwich panel based on the raw material maize. Holzforschung 72(1):65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai Z, Aguilar FX (2013) Meta-analysis of consumer's willingness-to-pay premiums for certified wood products. J For Econ 19(1):15–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Lyu JH (2014) Aesthetic evaluation of furniture design based on ANP method. In: Paper presented at the Applied Mechanics and Materials Conference. 574, 318–323

  • Choupani Chaydarreh K, Shalbafan A, Welling J (2017) Effect of ingredient ratios of rigid polyurethane foam on foam core panels properties. J Appl Polym Sci 134(17):44722

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordella M, Hidalgo C (2016) Analysis of key environmental areas in the design and labelling of furniture products: application of a screening approach based on a literature review of LCA studies. Sustain Prod Consum 8:64–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Dušak M, Jelačić D, Barčić AP, Novakova R (2017) Improvements to the production management system of wood-processing in small and medium enterprises in southeast Europe. BioResources 12(2):3303–3315

    Google Scholar 

  • de Carvalho ACK, Salvador R, Moro Piekarski C, Sokulski CC, de Francisco AC, de Carvalho Araújo Camargo SK (2019) Circular economy practices on wood panels: a bibliographic analysis. Sustainability 11(4):1057

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen R (2006) Studies on the market acceptance of lightweight furniture (Untersuchungen zur Marktakzeptanz von Leichtbaumobeln). Diploma thesis, OWL University of Applied Sciences, Lemgo, cited by Knauf M (2015):38–41

  • Hosseinzadeh O, Azizi M, Faezipour M, Hamzeh Y, Abdi M (2019) Prioritization of products for Iranian furniture clusters using Analytic Network Process. J For Wood Prod 72(1):57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakala I, Autio M, Toppinen A (2015) Young F innish and G erman consumers’ furniture acquisition–wooden, inherited or just low price? Int J Consum Stud 39(5):445–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Haydn A, Werner A, Stern T (2014) Assessing the potential price range for bioactive food additives from wood by using the van Westendorp method. J Austrian Soc Agric Econ 24:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt R, Sowlati T, Paradi JC (2012) Evaluation of strategic software investments for the Canadian cabinet industry. For Prod J 62(7):597–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson O, Lindberg S, Roos A, Hugosson M, Lindström M (2008) Consumer perceptions and preferences on solid wood, wood-based panels, and composites: A repertory grid study. Wood Fiber Sci 40(4):663–678

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kandelbauer A, Teischinger A (2009) On the warping behaviour of particleboards coated with melamine formaldehyde resin impregnated papers. Eur J Wood Prod 67(4):367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-009-0327-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knauf M (2015) Understanding the consumer: Multi-modal market research on consumer attitudes in Germany towards lightweight furniture and lightweight materials in furniture design. Eur J Wood Prod 73(2):259–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Labuschagne A, van Zyl S, van der Merwe D, Kruger A (2012) Consumers' expectations of furniture labels during their pre-purchase information search: an explication of proposed furniture labelling specifications. Int J Consum Stud 36(4):451–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S-H, Xie H (2013) Building professionals’ attitudes towards the use of wood in building design and construction in Taiwan. Eur J Wood Prod 71(4):497–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-013-0688-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lihra T, Graf R (2007) Multi-channel communication and consumer choice in the household furniture buying process. Direct Mark Int J 1(3):146–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo W, Mineo K, Matsushita K, Kanzaki M (2018) Consumer willingness to pay for modern wooden structures: A comparison between China and Japan. For Policy Econ 91:84–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemli G, Hızıroglu S, Serin H, Akyüz KC, Akyüz I, Toksoy D (2007) A perspective from furniture and cabinet manufacturers in Turkey. Build Environ 42(4):1699–1706

    Google Scholar 

  • Niavarani K, Tajdini A, Lashgari A (2017) Investigating the factors affecting the selection of wooden office furniture by customers. J Wood For Sci Tech 24(4):85–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Paletto A, Notaro S (2018) Secondary wood manufactures' willingness-to-pay for certified wood products in Italy. For Policy Econ 92:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakarinen TJ, Asikainen AT (2001) Consumer segments for wooden household furniture. Eur J Wood Prod 59(3):217–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos I, Karagouni G, Trigkas M, Beltsiou Z (2014) Mainstreaming green product strategies: why and how furniture companies integrate environmental sustainability? EuroMed J Bus 9(3):293–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Robichaud F, Richelieu A, Kozak R (2012) Wood use in nonresidential construction: an exploratory research of the roles of media and content in direct marketing. Wood Fiber Sci 44(4):394–411

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnasingam J, Liat LC, Ramasamy G, Mohamed S, Senin AL (2016) Attributes of sawn timber important for the manufacturers of value-added wood products in Malaysia. BioResources 11(4):8297–8306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2006) Decision making with the analytic network process. In: Economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. International series in operations research & management science, vol 195. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shalbafan A, Luedtke J, Welling J, Thoemen H (2012) Comparison of foam core materials in innovative lightweight wood-based panels. Eur J Wood Prod 70(1–3):287–292

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shalbafan A, Luedtke J, Welling J, Fruehwald A (2013) Physiomechanical properties of ultra-lightweight foam core particleboard: different core densities. Holzforschung 67(2):169–175

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shalbafan A, Tachmann O, Welling J (2016) Using expandable fillers to produce low density particleboard. Eur J Wood Prod 74(1):15–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shalbafan A, Rheme M, Thoemen H (2017) Ultra-light particleboard: characterization of foam core layer by digital image correlation. Eur J Wood Prod 75(1):43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon M, Russell-Bennett R, Previte J (2012) Consumer behaviour: Pearson Higher Education AU

  • Subbaiah KV, Prasad KD, Rao KN (2011) Customer-driven product planning using conjoint analysis and QFD? ANP methodology. Int J Prod Qual Manag 7(3):374–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Stosch M (2009) BM Special: Leichtbau - Werkstoffe Technologie Verarbeitung (Technology processing of lightweight materials). Konradin Verlag, Stuttgart, Leinfelden-Echterdingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Szolnoki G, Hoffmann D (2013) Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys—comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research. Wine Econ Policy 2(2):57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson LF, Surface EA, Martin DL, Sanders MG (2003) From paper to pixels: Moving personnel surveys to the Web. Pers Psychol 56(1):197–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Toivonen RM (2012) Product quality and value from consumer perspective—an application to wooden products. J For Econ 18(2):157–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolunay A, Türkoğlu T (2014) Perspectives and attitudes of forest products industry companies on the chain of custody certification: a case study from Turkey. Sustainability 6(2):857–871

    Google Scholar 

  • Toppinen A, Röhr A, Pätäri S, Lähtinen K, Toivonen R (2018) The future of wooden multistory construction in the forest bioeconomy—a Delphi study from Finland and Sweden. J For Econ 31:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlosky RP, Shupe TF (2005) Manufacturers' perceptions about using treated wood in children's playground equipment. For Prod J 55(12):190–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan M, Toppinen A (2016) Effect of perceived product quality and Lifesyles of Health and Sustainability (LOHAS) on consumer price preferences for children’s furniture in China. J For Econ 22:52–67

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Saeed Khojasteh-Khosro wants to acknowledge the support of Iran National Science Foundation for financial support of this research under the Grant number of 97014853, 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Wood and Paper Science and Technology, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran

    Saeed Khojasteh-Khosro & Ali Shalbafan

  2. Bern University of Applied Sciences, Institute for Materials and Wood Technology, Biel, Switzerland

    Heiko Thoemen

Authors
  1. Saeed Khojasteh-Khosro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Shalbafan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Heiko Thoemen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Shalbafan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors also declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khojasteh-Khosro, S., Shalbafan, A. & Thoemen, H. Preferences of furniture manufacturers for using lightweight wood-based panels as eco-friendly products. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 78, 593–603 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01519-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01519-8

Search

Navigation