Abstract
Cork production and technological quality were characterized following a field sampling covering the whole area of cork oaks in Portugal (six regions), with one site per 20,000 ha of cork oak area (30 sites), using samples taken from the tree at the time of cork stripping (20 trees per site). The following quality parameters were determined: thickness of the raw cork planks, calliper of the cork planks after boiling, cork growth index, i.e., growth of the first 8 complete years, density and porosity. The cork growth index was 28.6 mm, with significant differences between regions and sites within regions. A production cycle of 9 years was applied to 51% of the trees with annual productivity of 0.93 kg m−2 year−1 of debarked surface, 30.3 mm raw cork plank thickness, 33.9 mm corkboard calliper, 251 kg m−3 density and a porosity coefficient of 5.8%. For all the cork quality parameters analysed, the regions and sites within regions were a significant factor of variation. This research covers the natural variability of cork production features for industrial processing, namely for the production of wine stoppers. It is the most extensive work characterizing the geographical variation of cork as an industrial raw-material. The results are useful for optimizing the production cycle and for improving management practices and regulations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almeida A, Tomé M (2008) System for the prediction of cork growth. Silva Lusit 16:83–95
Almeida A, Tomé J, Tomé M (2010) Development of a system to predict the evolution of individual tree mature cork caliber over time. For Ecol Manag 260:1303–1314
Anjos O, Pereira H, Rosa ME (2008) Effect of quality, porosity and density on the compression properties of cork. Holz Roh-Werkst 66:295–301.
Anjos O, Rodrigues C, Morais J, Pereira H (2014) Effect of density on the compression behaviour of cork. Mater Des 53:1089–1096
Caritat A, Molinas M, Gutiérrez E (1996) Annual cork-ring width variability of Quercus suber L. in relation to temperature and precipitation (Extremadura, southwestern Spain). For Ecol Manag 86:113–120
Caritat A, Gutiérrez E, Molinas M (2000) Influence of weather on cork-ring width. Tree Physiol 20:893–900
Costa A, Pereira H (2006) Decision rules for computer-vision quality classification of wine natural cork stoppers. Am J Enol Viticult 5:210–219
Costa A, Pereira H, Oliveira A (2002) Influence of climate on the seasonality of radial growth of cork oak during a cork production cycle. Ann For Sci 59:429–437
Costa A, Pereira H, Oliveira A (2004) The effect of cork stripping damage on diameter growth of Quercus suber L. Forestry 77:1–8
Costa A, Pereira H, Madeira M (2009) Landscape dynamics in endangered cork oak woodlands in Southwertern Portugal (1958–2005). Agrofor Syst 77:83–96
Cumbre F, Lopes F, Pereira H (2000) The effect of water boiling on annual ring width and porosity of cork. Wood Fiber Sci 32:125–133
Dehane B, Benrahou A, Bouhraoua R, Hamani FZ, Belhoucine L (2014) Chemical composition of Algerian cork according the origin and the quality. Int J Res Environ Stud 1:17–25
Faria DP, Fonseca AL, Pereira H, Teodoro OMND (2011) Permeability of cork to gases. J Agric Food Chem 59:3590–3597
Ferreira A, Lopes F, Pereira H (2000) Characterization of cork growth and quality in one region of production. Ann For Sci 57:187–193
Gómez-Sánchez I, García de Ceca JL, García-Olmo J, Lara-Buil L, López-Luque R, Prades C (2013) Application of image analysis and NIRS technology to the evaluation of the porosity of planks, sheets and cork stoppers, and its relation with the industrial quality. Maderas-Cienc Tecnol 15:293–309
Gonzalez-Adrados J, Lopes F, Pereira H (2000) Quality grading of cork planks with classification models based on defect characterisation. Holz Roh-Werkst 58:39–45
González-Hernández F, González-Adrados JR, Gracía de Ceca JL, Sánchez-González M (2014) Quality grading of cork stoppers based on porosity, density and elasticity. Eur J Wood Prod 72:149–156
Jové P, Olivella A, Cano L (2011) Study of the variability in chemical composition of bark layers of Quercus suber L. from different production areas. Bioresources 6:1806–1815
Lopes F, Pereira H (2000) Definition of quality classes for champagne cork stoppers in the high quality range. Wood Sci Technol 34:3–10
Oliveira V, Knapic S, Pereira H (2012) Natural variability of surface porosity of wine cork stoppers of different commercial classes. J Int Sci Vigne Vin 46:331–340
Oliveira V, Lopes P, Cabral M, Pereira H (2013) Kinetics of oxygen ingress into wine bottles closed with natural cork stoppers of different qualities. Am J Enol Viticult 64:395–399
Oliveira V, Rosa ME, Pereira H (2014) Variability of the compression properties of cork. Wood Sci Technol 48:937–948
Oliveira V, Knapic S, Pereira H (2015) Classification modeling based on surface porosity for the grading of natural cork stoppers for quality wines. Food Bioprod Process 93:69–76
Oliveira V, Lauw A, Pereira H (2016a) Sensitivity of cork growth to drought events: insights from a 24-year chronology. Clim Change 137(1):261–274
Oliveira V, Van den Bulcke J, Van Acker J, de Schryver T, Pereira H (2016b) Cork structural discontinuities studied with X-ray microtomography. Holzforschung 70(1):87–94
Paulo JA, Palma JHN, Gomes AA, Faias SP, Tomé J, Tomé M (2015) Predicting site index from climate and soil variables for cork oak (Quercus suber L.) stands in Portugal. New For 46:293–307
Paulo JA, Pereira H, Tomé M (2017) Analysis of variables influencing tree cork caliper in two consecutive cork extractions using cork growth index modelling. Agrofor Syst 91(2):221–237
Pereira H (2007) Cork: biology, production and uses. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Pereira H (2013) Variability of the chemical composition of cork. Bioresources 8:2246–2256
Pereira H, Tomé M (2004) Non-wood products: cork oak. In: Burley J, Evans J, Youngquist JA (eds) Encyclopedia of forest sciences. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 613–620
Pereira H, Graça J, Baptista C (1992) The effect of growth rate on the structure and compressive properties of cork. IAWA Bull 13:389–396
Pereira H, Melo B, Pinto R (1994) Yield and quality in the production of cork stoppers. Holz Roh-Werkst 52:211–214
Pereira H, Lopes F, Graça J (1996) The evaluation of the quality of cork planks by image analysis. Holzforschung 50:111–115
Pires V (2008) Drought analysis in Portugal mainland. Meteorology and geophysics monography, vol 49, Instituto de Meteorologia, Lisbon (in Portuguese)
Rosa ME, Pereira H, Fortes AM (1990) Effects of hot water treatment on the structure and compressive properties of cork. Wood Fiber Sci 22:149–164.
Sánchez-González M, Calama R, Cañellas I, Montero G (2007) Variables influencing cork thickness in spanish cork oak forests: a modelling approach. Ann For Sci 64:301–312
Surový P, Olbrich A, Polle A, Ribeiro NA, Sloboda B, Langenfeld-Heyser R (2009) A new method for measurement of annual growth rings in cork by means of autofluorescence. Trees 23:1237–1246
Vázquez J, Pereira H (2005) Mixed models to estimate tree oven-dried cork weight in Central and Southern Portugal. For Ecol Manag 213:117–132
Acknowledgements
The research was carried out under the framework of Centro de Estudos Florestais, a research unit funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal (UID/AGR/00239/2013) and within Project INIA-PAMAF 4053. Funding from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia is acknowledged by Vanda Oliveira as doctoral student (SFRH/BD/77550/2011) and by Alexandra Lauw as doctoral student through the SUSFOR Programme (BD/52694/2014). Authors acknowledge the contribution of the anonymous reviewers and editors from European Journal of Forest Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lauw, A., Oliveira, V., Lopes, F. et al. Variation of cork quality for wine stoppers across the production regions in Portugal. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 76, 123–132 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-017-1196-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-017-1196-5