Skip to main content
Log in

Bildgebung zur Operationsplanung

Tumoroperationen einschließlich rekonstruktiver Verfahren

Imaging for surgical planning

Tumor surgery including reconstructive procedures

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
HNO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Bildgebung ist neben der klinischen Befunderhebung ein wichtiges Diagnostikum, das zur Therapieentscheidung und insbesondere zur Operationsplanung bei Kopf-Hals-Karzinomen herangezogen werden muss. Die Bedeutung und die Art der Bildgebung sind abhängig von der Lokalisation des Primärtumors. Bei jeder Bildgebung müssen neben der Darstellung des Primärtumors auch die Lymphabflusswege einbezogen werden, um ein Gesamtkonzept der operativen Therapie erstellen zu können. Neben der flächenhaften Tumorausdehnung ist von besonderer Bedeutung, auch das Tumorvolumen durch die Bildgebung zu erfassen, um dadurch das Ausmaß der Resektion und die möglicherweise notwendige Rekonstruktion zu indizieren. Die Art der Bildgebung, z. B. Computertomographie oder Magnetresonanztomographie, ist abhängig von der Tumorlokalisation. In manchen Fällen ergänzen sich beide Verfahren.

Abstract

Alongside clinical investigation, imaging is an important diagnostic modality for guiding treatment decisions and particularly for surgical planning in head and neck cancer. The significance and type of imaging depends on localization of the primary tumor. Beside the primary tumor, each imaging procedure must also include the lymph nodes, in order to develop an overall concept of surgical treatment. In addition to the superficial growth of a tumor, it is of utmost importance that its infiltration also be detected by imaging, in order to define the extent of tumor resection and identify potentially necessary reconstructive procedures. The type of imaging needed to understand tumor localization and size, e.g., CT or MRI, depends on the region. In some cases the methods are complementary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7

Literatur

  1. Hermans R (2006) Head and neck cancer: how imaging predicts treatment outcome. Cancer Imaging 6(Special Issue A):S145–S153

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Landry D, Glastonbury CM (2015) Squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: a review. Radiol Clin North Am 53:81–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lell M, Mantsopoulos K, Uder M, Wuest W (2016) Bildgebung der Kopf-Hals-Region. HNO 64(3):189–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Godeny M (2014) Prognostic factors in advanced pharyngeal and oral cavity cancer; significance of multimodality imaging in terms of 7th edition of TNM. Cancer Imaging 14:15

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ko B, Parvathaneni U, Hudgins PA, Anzai Y (2016) Do radiologists report the TNM staging in radiology reports for head and neck cancers? A national survey study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. doi:10.3174/ajnr.a4742

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hudgins PA, Beitler JJ (2013) lntroduction to the imaging and staging of cancer. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 23:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McMahon JD, Devine JC, Hetherington J et al (2011) lnvolved surgical margins in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma-an anatomical problem? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:172–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shum JW, Dierks EJ (2014) Evaluation and staging ofthe neck in patients with malignant disease. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 26(2):209–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Genden EM, Rinaldo A, Jacobson A et al (2005) Management of mandibular invasion: when is a marginal mandibulectomy appropriate? Oral Oncol 41:776–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rumboldt Z, Day TA, Michel M (2006) Imaging of oral cavity cancer. Oral Oncol 42:854–865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Paiva RR, Figueiredo PT, Leite AF, Silva MA, Guerra EN (2011) Oral cancer staging establlshed by magnetic resonance imaging. Braz Oral Res 25:512–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Manavis J, Sivridis L, Koukourakis MI (2005) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the impact of CT-scan and of MRI on staging, radiotherapy treatment planning, and outcome of the disease. Clin Imaging 29:128–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang SY, Lou JL, Chen J, Zhang SZ, Guo L (2016) Salvage surgery for neck residue or recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma after primary radiotherapy: options of surgical methods and regions. World J Surg Oncol 14(1):89

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lell MM, Greess H, Hothorn T, Janka R, Bautz WA, Baum U (2004) Multiplanar functional imaging of the larynx and hypopharynx with multislice spiral CT. Eur Radiol 14:2198–2205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. lglesias-Moreno MC, Lopez-Salcedo MA, Gomez-Serrano M, Gimeno-Hernandez J, Poch-Broto J (2016) Parapharyngeal space tumors: fifty-one cases managed in a single tertiary care center. Acta Otolaryngol 136:298–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Verikas A, Uloza V, Bacauskiene M, Gelzinis A, Kelertas E (2009) Advances in laryngeal imaging. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:1509–1520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Banko B, Dukic V, Milovanovlc J, Kovac JD, Artiko V, Maksimovic R (2011) Diagnostic significance of magnetlc resonance imaging in preoperative evaluation of patlents with laryngeal tumors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:1617–1623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blitz AM, Aygun N (2008) Radlologic evaluation of larynx cancer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 41:697–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jager EA, Kasperts N, Caldas-Magalhaes J et al (2015) GTV delineation in supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma: interobserver agreement of CT versus CT-MR delineation. Radiat Oncol 10:26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Banko B, Djukic V, Milovanovlc J, Kovac J, Novakovic Z, Maksimovic R (2014) MRI in evaluation of neoplastic invasion into preepiglottic and paraglottic space. Auris Nasus Larynx 41:471–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ryu IS, Lee JH, Roh JL et al (2015) Clinical implication of computed tomography findings in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:2939–2945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tibbetts KM, Tan M (2015) Role of advanced laryngeal imaging in glottic cancer: early detection and evaluation of glottic neoplasms. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 48:565–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang BY, Solle M, Weissler MC (2012) Larynx: anatomic imaging for diagnosis and management. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 45(6):1325–1361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lell MM, Greess H, Hothorn T, Janka R, Bautz WA, Baum U (2004) Multiplanar functional imaging of the larynx and hypopharynx with multislice spiral CT. Eur Radiol 14:2198–2205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Allegra E, Ferrise P, Trapasso S et al (2014) Early glottic cancer: role of MRI in the preoperative staging. Biomed Res Int 2014:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Bootz.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

F. Bootz und S. Greschus geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bootz, F., Greschus, S. Bildgebung zur Operationsplanung. HNO 65, 472–481 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-017-0343-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-017-0343-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation