Skip to main content
Log in

Sprachaudiometrie, Sprachwahrnehmung und kognitive Funktionen

Speech audiometry, speech perception and cognitive functions. German version

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
HNO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Untersuchung kognitiver Funktionen im Zusammenhang mit der Wahrnehmung von Sprache hat in den letzten Jahren zunehmendes wissenschaftliches und klinisches Interesse erlangt. Vor allem vor dem Hintergrund altersassoziierter Hörstörungen und kognitiven Abbaus ergeben sich möglicherweise Perspektiven für eine individualisierte audiologische Diagnostik und Rehabilitation. Der vorliegende Übersichtsartikel widmet sich der Verknüpfung von Sprachaudiometrie, Sprachwahrnehmung und kognitiven Faktoren. Er stellt Modelle der Sprachwahrnehmung vor, diskutiert Zusammenhänge zwischen neuropsychologischen Befunden und sprachaudiometrischen Ergebnissen und präsentiert aktuelle Bestrebungen, kognitive Leistungen bei sprachaudiometrischen Verfahren zu berücksichtigen.

Abstract

Examination of cognitive functions in the framework of speech perception has recently gained increasing scientific and clinical interest. Especially against the background of age-related hearing impairment and cognitive decline potential new perspectives in terms of better individualisation of auditory diagnosis and rehabilitation might arise. This review addresses the relationships of speech audiometry, speech perception and cognitive functions. It presents models of speech perception, discusses associations of neuropsychological with audiometric outcomes and shows recent efforts to consider cognitive functions with speech audiometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Akeroyd MA (2008) Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol 47(Suppl 2):53–71. doi:10.1080/14992020802301142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baddeley A (2010) Working memory. Curr Biol 20(4):R136–R140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bell R, Buchner A, Mund I (2008) Age-related differences in irrelevant-speech effects. Psychol Aging 23(2):377–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Best V, Keidser G, Buchholz JM, Freeston K (2016) Development and preliminary evaluation of a new test of ongoing speech comprehension. Int J Audiol 55(1):45–52. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1055835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carroll R, Ruigendijk E (2013) The effect of syntactic complexity on processing sentences in noise. J Psycholinguist Res 42(2):139–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Fockert JW (2005) Keeping priorities: the role of working memory and selective attention in cognitive aging. Sci Aging Knowledge Environ 44:pe34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Diamond A (2013) Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol 64(1):135–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heinrich A, Henshaw H, Ferguson MA (2015) The relationship of speech intelligibility with hearing sensitivity, cognition, and perceived hearing difficulties varies for different speech perception tests. Front Psychol 16:6–782 (eCollection 2015). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00782

    Google Scholar 

  9. Humes LE (2013) Understanding the speech-understanding problems of older adults. Am J Audiol 22(2):303–305. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jerger J, Wilson R, Margolis R (2014) Suggestion for terminological reform in speech audiometry. J Am Acad Audiol 25(2):229–230. doi:10.3766/jaaa.25.2.11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin FR, Yaffe K, Xia J, Xue QL, Harris TB, Purchase-Helzner E, Satterfield S, Ayonayon HN, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Health ABC Study Group (2013) Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Intern Med 173(4):293–299. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lunner T (2003) Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use. Int J Audiol 42(Suppl 1):49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McGarrigle R, Munro KJ, Dawes P, Stewart AJ, Moore DR, Barry JG, Amitay S (2014) Listening effort and fatigue: what exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ’white paper’. Int J Audiol 53(7):433–440. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.890296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meister H, Schreitmüller S, Grugel L, Landwehr M, von Wedel H, Walger M, Meister I (2011) Untersuchungen zum Sprachverstehen und zu kognitiven Fähigkeiten im Alter. HNO 59(7):689–695. doi:10.1007/s00106-011-2262-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meister H, Schreitmüller S, Grugel L, Beutner D, Walger M, Meister I (2013) Examining speech perception in noise and cognitive functions in the elderly. Am J Audiol 22(2):310–312. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0067)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meister H, Schreitmüller S, Grugel L, Ortmann M, Beutner D, Walger M, Meister IG (2013) Cognitive resources related to speech recognition with a competing talker in young and older listeners. Neuroscience 232:74–82. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meister H, Rählmann S, Walger M, Margolf-Hackl S, Kießling J (2015) Hearing aid fitting in older persons with hearing impairment: the influence of cognitive function, age, and hearing loss on hearing aid benefit. Clin Interv Aging 10:435–443. doi:10.2147/CIA.S77096

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Meister H, Schreitmüller S, Ortmann M, Rählmann S, Walger M (2016) Effects of hearing loss and cognitive load on speech recognition with competing talkers. Front Psychol 7:301. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00301

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA (1994) Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 95(2):1085–1099. doi:10.1121/1.408469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ptok M, Kiessling J (2004) Sprachperzeption – Basis sprachaudiometrischer Untersuchungen. HNO 52(9):824–830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rönnberg J, Lunner T, Zekveld A, Sörqvist P, Danielsson H, Lyxell B, Dahlström O, Signoret C, Stenfelt S, Pichora-Fuller MK, Rudner M (2013) The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Front Syst Neurosci 7:31. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rudner M, Foo C, Rönnberg J, Lunner T (2009) Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids. Scand J Psychol 50(5):405–418. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00745.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rudner M, Rönnberg J, Lunner T (2011) Working memory supports listening in noise for persons with hearing impairment. J Am Acad Audiol 22(3):156–167. doi:10.3766/jaaa.22.3.4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shinn-Cunningham BG, Best V (2008) Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing. Trends Amplif 12(4):283–299

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sommers MS, Hale S, Myerson J, Rose N, Tye-Murray N, Spehar B (2011) Listening comprehension across the adult lifespan. Ear Hear 32(6):775–781. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182234cf6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Souza P, Arehart K, Neher T (2015) Working memory and hearing aid processing: literature findings, future directions, and clinical applications. Front Psychol 6:1894. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01894

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Uslar V, Ruigendijk E, Hamann C, Brand T, Kollmeier B (2011) How does linguistic complexity influence intelligibility in a German audiometric sentence intelligibility test? Int J Audiol 50(9):621–631. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.582166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Uslar VN, Carroll R, Hanke M, Hamann C, Ruigendijk E, Brand T, Kollmeier B (2013) Development and evaluation of a linguistically and audiologically controlled sentence intelligibility test. J Acoust Soc Am 134(4):3039–3056. doi:10.1121/1.4818760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wagener KC, Kühnel V, Kollmeier B (1999) Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests in deutscher Sprache I: Design des Oldenburger Satztests. Z Audiol 38(1):4–15

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wendt D, Kollmeier B, Brand T (2015) How hearing impairment affects sentence comprehension: using eye fixations to investigate the duration of speech processing. Trends Hear. doi:10.1177/2331216515584149

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wingfield A (1996) Cognitive factors in auditory performance: context, speed of processing, and constraints of memory. J Am Acad Audiol 7(3):175–182

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wingfield A, Amichetti NM, Lash A (2015) Cognitive aging and hearing acuity: modeling spoken language comprehension. Front Psychol 6:684. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00684

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Meister.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

H. Meister gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine vom Autor durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Eine englische Version des Beitrags ist unter DOI 10.1007/s00106-016-0250-7 verfügbar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meister, H. Sprachaudiometrie, Sprachwahrnehmung und kognitive Funktionen. HNO 65, 189–194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-016-0229-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-016-0229-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation