Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interdisziplinäre Schädelbasischirurgie

Von der explorativen Kraterloch- zur prädiktiven Tunnelchirurgie?

Interdisciplinary skull base surgery

From explorative crater cavity surgery to predictive tunnel surgery?

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
HNO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Endoskopisch geführte oder endoskopisch assistierte Operationsverfahren gewinnen in der Schädelbasischirurgie immer mehr an Bedeutung. Insbesondere im Bereich der Frontobasis hat das Endoskop nicht nur in der konventionellen funktionellen Nasennebenhöhlenchirurgie (FESS), sondern auch in der Schädelbasischirurgie mit geplanter Eröffnung des Subarachnoidalraums das Mikroskop weitestgehend abgelöst. Der Nutzen für den Patienten im Bereich der Schädelbasischirurgie ist jedoch in Hinblick auf Mortalität, Morbidität und Rezidivrate unklar, denn es fehlen Studien nach den Kriterien der „evidence-based medicine“.

Abstract

Total endoscopic or endoscopy-assisted surgical procedures are becoming more and more important for skull base surgery. In particular at the frontal skull base endoscopic procedures with planned opening of the subarachnoidal space have mostly replaced the microscope because of the good experiences in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The advantages for the patients of endoscopic procedures with planned opening of the subarachnoidal space measured by criteria, such as mortality, morbidity or recurrence rate are unclear due to a lack of valid study data according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Bolger WE (2009) Piezoelectric surgical device in endoscopic sinus surgery: an initial clinical experience. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 118(9):621–624

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Castelnuovo P, Dallan I, Battaglia P, Bignami M (2010) Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: past, present and future. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267(5):649–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Castelnuovo P, Dallan I, Bignami M et al (2010) Nasopharyngeal endoscopic resection in the management of selected malignancies: ten-year experience. Rhinology 48(1):84–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dallan I, Bignami M, Battaglia P et al (2010) Fully endoscopic transnasal approach to the jugular foramen: anatomic study and clinical considerations. Neurosurgery 67(3 Suppl Operative):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dallan I, Seccia V, Muscatello L et al (2010) Transoral endoscopic anatomy of the parapharyngeal space: A step-by-step logical approach with surgical considerations. Head Neck 27 (epub ahead of print)

  6. Dellepiane M, Mora R, Salzano FA, Salami A (2008) Clinical evaluation of piezoelectric ear surgery. Ear, Nose Throat J 87(4):212–213

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jane JA Jr, Prevedello DM, Alden TD, Laws ER Jr (2010) The transsphenoidal resection of pediatric craniopharyngiomas: a case series. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5(1):49–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kassam AB, Gardner P, Snyderman CH et al (2005) Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Foc 19:E6

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khalid AN, Quraishi SA, Kennedy DW (2004) Long-term quality of life measures after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 18(3):131–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kunwar S, Chang S, Westphal M et al PRECISE Study Group (2010) Phase III randomized trial of CED of IL13-PE38QQR vs Gliadel wafers for recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 12(8):871–881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lund VJ, Stammberger H, Nicolai P et al (2010) European Rhinologic Society Advisory Board on Endoscopic Techniques in the Management of Nose, Paranasal Sinus and Skull Base Tumours: European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of the nose, paranasal sinuses and skull base. Rhinol Suppl (22):1–143

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mahoney F, Barthel D (1965) Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md Med J 14:61–65

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marchioni D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Grammatica A et al (2010) Lateral endoscopic approach to epitympanic diaphragm and Prussak’s space: a dissection study. Surg Radiol Anat 32(9):843–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marchioni D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Molteni G et al (2010) Endoscopic tympanoplasty in patients with attic retraction pockets. Laryngoscope 120(9):1847–1855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marchioni D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Piccinini A et al (2010) Inferior retrotympanum revisited: an endoscopic anatomic study. Laryngoscope. 120(9):1880–1886

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miyazaki H, Deveze A, Magnan J (2005) Neuro-otologic surgery through minimally invasive retrosigmoid approach: endoscope assisted microvascular decompression, vestibular neurotomy, and tumor removal. Laryngoscope 115(9):1612–1617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morera VA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Prevedello DM et al (2010) Far-medial expanded endonasal approach to the inferior third of the clivus: the transcondylar and transjugular tubercle approaches. Neurosurgery 66(6 Suppl Operative):211–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rankin J (1957) Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scott Med J 2(5):200–215

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Salami A, Dellepiane M, Mora F et al (2008) Piezosurgery® in the cochleostomy through multiple middle ear approaches. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72(5):653–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schipper J, Klenzner T, Berlis A et al (2006) Objektivierung von Therapieergebnissen in der Schädelbasischirurgie durch virtuelle Modellanalyse. HNO 54(9):677–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schipper J, Maier W, Berlis A, Ridder GJ (2005) Computerassistierte Chirurgie (CAS) zur optimalen Behandlung der kraniofazialen Dysplasie. HNO 53(9):766–772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Silverman JB, Prasittivatechakool K, Busaba NY (2009) An evidence-based review of endoscopic frontal sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23(6):e59–e62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sulter G, Steen C, De Keyser J (1999) Use of the Barthel index and modified Rankin scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke 30 (8):1538–1541

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson JT, Hareendran A, Hendry A et al (2005) Reliability of the modified Rankin scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview. Stroke 36 (4):777–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schipper, J. Interdisziplinäre Schädelbasischirurgie. HNO 59, 327–331 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-011-2281-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-011-2281-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation