Skip to main content
Log in

Der erweiterte Ductus und Saccus endolymphaticus

Teil 1: Analyse bildgebender Befunde

Large endolymphatic duct and sac syndrome (LEDS)

Part I: Analysis of imaging findings

  • Originalien
  • Published:
HNO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Das Syndrom des erweiterten Ductus und Saccus endolymphaticus („large endolymphatic duct and sac syndrome“, LEDS) stellt die häufigste radiologisch nachweisbare Innenohrfehlbildung (IO-FB) assoziiert mit sensorineuraler Schwerhörigkeit (SNHL) dar. Dennoch ist das LEDS im deutschsprachigen Raum relativ wenig bekannt.

Methoden

Unter allen Patienten (P), die bei IO-FB-Verdacht zwischen 1994 and 2003 eine Schnittbildgebung erhielten, identifizierten wir sämtliche LEDS-Fälle. Retrospektiv wurden die klinisch-audiologischen Daten sowie die durchgeführten HR-CT und MRT evaluiert.

Ergebnisse

Von 169 P zeigten 17 P (medianes Alter: 12 Jahre, 12 weiblich) bzw. 28 Ohren ein LEDS. Bei 10 P (6%; 15 Ohren) bestand ein isoliertes LEDS, 7 P (4%, 13 Ohren) zeigten weitere IO-FB. Am häufigsten fanden sich Vestibulumdysplasien (13/13 Ohren), eine Mondini-Deformität (10/13 Ohren) und Bogengangsdilatationen (7/13 Ohren). Schwerere kochleäre und Vestibulum-Bogengangs-IO-FB betrafen 3/13 Ohren. Eine Korrelation zwischen morphologischem Defekt und SNHL-Grad war nicht nachweisbar.

Fazit

Das LEDS kann eine evtl. bisher zu wenig beachtete Ursache einer SNHL sein. Zur Diagnosesicherung ist die Bildgebung erforderlich.

Abstract

Objective

Large endolymphatic duct and sac (LEDS) syndrome is the most common radiologically detectable form of inner ear malformation (IEM) associated with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Nevertheless, it is relatively unknown in the German-speaking countries.

Methods

Among all patients referred from ear, nose, and throat specialists to the radiology department with clinically suspected IEM between 1994 and 2003, we identified the cases of LEDS. The retrospective study included clinical records, high-resolution computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Results

Of 169 patients, 17 (median age 12 years; 12 females) showed LEDS. A total of 28 ears were affected. Ten patients (6%; 15 ears) had isolated LEDS, while seven patients showed additional IEM (4%; 13 ears). The most frequent of these was dysplastic vestibule (13/13 ears), followed by Mondini deformity (10/13 ears) and dilated semicircular canals (7/13 ears). Three of 13 ears revealed severe IEM of the cochlea, vestibule, and semicircular canals. No correlation could be demonstrated between the severity of morphological changes and the degree of SNHL.

Conclusion

LEDS may be an underestimated cause of SNHL. Imaging is necessary for a confident diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Antonelli PJ, Nall AV, Lemmerling MM et al. (1998) Hearing loss with cochlear modiolar defects and large vestibular aqueducts. Am J Otol 19: 306–312

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arcand P, Desrosiers M, Dube J, Abela A (1991) The large vestibular aqueduct syndrome and sensorineural hearing loss in the pediatric population. J Otolaryngol 20: 247–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borck G, Napiontek U, Pfarr N et al. (2006) Angeborene Schwerhörigkeit und Struma: Pendred-Syndrom. Dtsch Arztebl 103: A 3108–3114

    Google Scholar 

  4. Casselman JW, Kuhweide R, Ampe W et al. (1996) Inner ear malformations in patients with sensorineural hearing loss detection with gradient-echo (3DFT-CISS) MRI. Neuroradiology 38: 278–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dahlen RT, Harnsberger HR, Gray SD et al. (1997) Overlapping thin-section fast spin-echo MR of the large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18: 67–75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Davidson HC, Harnsberger HR, Lemmerling MM et al. (1999) MR evaluation of vestibulocochlear anomalies associated with large endolymphatic duct and sac. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20: 1435–1441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Emmett JR (1985) The large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Am J Otol 6: 387–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Everett LA, Belyantseva IA, Noben-Trauth K et al. (2001) Targeted disruption of mouse PDS provides insight about the inner-ear defects encountered in Pendred syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 10: 153–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fugazzola L, Mannavola D, Cerutti N et al. (2000) Molecular analysis of the Pendred’s syndrome gene and magnetic resonance imaging studies of the inner ear are essential for the diagnosis of true Pendred’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85: 2469–2475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujita S, Sando I (1996) Three-dimensional course of the vestibular aqueduct. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 253: 122–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Harnsberger HR, Dahlen RT, Shelton C et al. (1995) Advanced techniques in magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the large endolymphatic duct and sac syndrome. Laryngoscope 105: 1037–1042

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirai S, Cureoglu S, Schachern PA et al. (2006) Large vestibular aquaeduct syndrome: a human temporal bone study. Laryngoscope 116: 2007–2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jackler RK, De La Cruz A (1989) The large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Laryngoscope 99: 1238–1242; discussion 1242–1243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kösling S, Krueger M, Dietrich J et al. (1998) CISS imaging of the temporal bone: normal anatomy and pathological findings. Radiology 209: 424

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kösling S, Rasinski C, Amaya B (2006) Imaging and clinical findings in large endolymphatic duct and sac syndrome. Eur J Radiol 57: 54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lai CC, Shiao AS (2004) Chronological changes of hearing in pediatric patients with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Laryngoscope 114: 832–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Levenson MJ, Parisier SC, Jacobs M, Edelstein DR (1989) The large vestibular aqueduct syndrome in children. A review of 12 cases and the description of a new clinical entity. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115: 54–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Loundon N, Rouillon I, Munier N et al. (2005) Cochlear implantation in children with internal ear malformations. Otol Neurotol 26: 668–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Madden C, Halsted M, Benton C et al. (2003) Enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome in the pediatric population. Otol Neurotol 24: 625–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Naganawa S, Ito T, Iwayama E et al. (1999) MR imaging of the cochlear modiolus – area measurement in healthy subjects and in patients with a large endolymphatic duct and sac. Radiology 213: 819–823

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Okumura T, Takahashi H, Honjo I et al. (1995) Sensorineural hearing loss in patients with large vestibular aqueduct. Laryngoscope 105: 289–293; discussion 293–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Park AH, Kou B, Hotaling A et al. (2000) Clinical course of pediatric congenital inner ear malformations. Laryngoscope 110: 1715–1719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Phelps PD, Coffey RA, Trembath RC et al. (1998) Radiological malformations of the ear in Pendred syndrome. Clin Radiol 53: 268–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pryor SP, Madeo AC, Reynolds JC et al. (2005) SLC26A4/PDS genotype-phenotype correlation in hearing loss with enlargement of the vestibular aquaeduct (EVA): evidence that Pendred syndrome and non-syndromic EVA are distinct clinical and genetic entities. J Med Genet 42: 159–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pyle GM (2000) Embryological development and large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Laryngoscope 110: 1837–1842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stinckens C, Standaert L, Casselman JW et al. (2001) The presence of a widened vestibular aqueduct and progressive sensorineural hearing loss in the branchio-oto-renal syndrome. A family study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 59: 163–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Valvassori GE, Clemis JD (1978) The large vestibular aqueduct syndrome Laryngoscope 88: 723–728

  28. Valvassori GE (1983) The large vestibular aqueduct and associated anomalies of the inner ear. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 16: 95–101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zalzal GH, Tomaski SM, Vezina LG et al. (1995) Enlarged vestibular aqueduct and sensorineural hearing loss in childhood. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121: 23–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Bartel-Friedrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartel-Friedrich, S., Amaya, B., Rasinski, C. et al. Der erweiterte Ductus und Saccus endolymphaticus. HNO 56, 219–224 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-007-1664-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-007-1664-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation