Skip to main content
Log in

Zuverlässigkeit und Praxistauglichkeit von 2 Streptokokken-A-Schnelltests

  • Originalien
  • Published:
HNO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Streptokokken-A-Schnelltests haben im Vergleich zur konventionellen Kultur eine gute Spezifität über 90% bei jedoch nur mäßiger Sensitivität um 80–90%.

Wir untersuchten die Zuverlässigkeit des optischen Immunoassays Strep A OIA MAX der Fa. Thermo BioStar im Vergleich mit dem Enzym-Immunoassay Strep A Plus der Fa. Abbott an 65 Notfallpatienten mit akuter Tonsillopharyngitis. Als Referenz wurde eine Schafblutagarkultur verwendet, die bei unterschiedlichen Ergebnissen beider Schnelltests mit einer selektiven Anreicherungsbouillon und einem Genomnachweis mittels Gensonde (Gen-Probe) bestätigt wurde.

Zusammenfassend war der Strep A Plus bei ähnlicher Zuverlässigkeit wesentlich einfacher und schneller durchzuführen als der Strep A OIA MAX. Wegen der nur moderaten Sensitivität beider Schnelltests ist ggf. das Anlegen einer Kultur empfehlenswert.

Abstract

Rapid streptococcal-A-antigen detection assays have good specificity (over 90 percent) but moderate sensitivity (between 80 and 90 percent), when the tests are compared with a standard throat culture. Contradictory results have been found for one of the more recent tests, the optical immune assay Strep A OIA MAX, while for 6 years, we have been using the immune assay Strep A Plus.

Results of the optical immunoassay and the conventional immune assay Strep A Plus were compared in 65 patients with acute pharyngitis. A standard culture was used as reference and confirmed by enhanced broth culturing and nucleic acid hybridization assay (Gen-Probe) when the two detection assays produced contradictory results.

While both assays were equally sensitive (78.3%), Strep A OIA MAX and Strep A Plus had a similar specificity of 95.2% and 100%, respectively.

Four and nine steps were required for Strep A Plus and for Strep A OIA MAX test procedures, respectively with results being available in 4–5 min and in 9–10 min, respectively.

We conclude that both rapid immunoassays have a similar reliability while the handling of the Strep A Plus is much simpler than the handling of the Strep A OIA MAX. Neither rapid immunoassays are sensitive enough to eliminate the need for backup cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1.
Abb. 2.
Abb. 3.
Abb. 4.

Literatur

  1. Baker DM, Cooper RM, Rhodes C, Weymouth LA, Dalton HP (1995) Superiority of conventional culture technique over rapid detection of group A Streptococcus by optical immunoassay. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 21: 61–64

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bisno AL (2001) Acute pharyngitis. N Engl J Med 344: 205–211

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bolz D (2001) Akutes rheumatisches Fieber. Bulletin des Schweizerischen Bundesamtes für Gesundheit 36/01: 663–664

  4. American Academy of Pediatrics (2000) Group A streptococcal infections. In: Peter G (Hrsg) Red Book: Report of the Commitee on Infectious Diseases. Elk Grove Village, pp 526–536

  5. Dajani A, Taubert K, Ferrieri P, Peter G, Shulman S (1995) Treatment of acute streptococcal pharyngitis and prevention of rheumatic fever: a statement for health professionals. Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, the American Heart Association. Pediatrics 96: 758–764

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dale JC, Vetter EA, Contezac JM et al. (1994) Evaluation of two rapid antigen assays, BioStar Strep A OIA and Pacific Biotech CARDS O.S., and culture for detection of group A streptococci in throat swabs. J Clin Microbiol 32: 2698–2701

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daly JA, Korgenski EK, Munson AC, Llausas-Magana E (1994) Optical immunoassay for streptococcal pharyngitis: evaluation of accuracy with routine and mucoid strains associated with acute rheumatic fever outbreak in the intermountain area of the United States. J Clin Microbiol 32: 531–532

    Google Scholar 

  8. Della-Latta P, Whittier S, Hosmer M, Agre F (1994) Rapid detection of group A streptococcal pharyngitis in a pediatric population with optical immunoassay. Pediatr Infect Dis J 13: 742–743

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frei R (1991) Diagnostik der Streptokokkenangina. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 80: 1471–1473

  10. Fries SM (1995) Diagnosis of group A streptococcal pharyngitis in a private clinic: comparative evaluation of an optical immunoassay method and culture. J Pediatr 126: 933–936

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gerber MA, Tanz RR, Kabat W et al. (1997) Optical immunoassay test for group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis. An office-based, multicenter investigation. JAMA 277: 899–903

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harbeck RJ, Teague J, Crossen GR, Maul DM, Childers PL (1993) Novel, rapid optical immunoassay technique for detection of group A streptococci from pharyngeal specimens: comparison with standard culture methods. J Clin Microbiol 31: 839–844

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harris R, Paine D, Wittler R, Bruhn F (1995) Impact on empiric treatment of group A streptococcal pharyngitis using an optical immunoassay. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 34: 122–127

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hart AP, Buck LL, Morgan S, Saverio S, McLaughlin JC (1997) A comparison of the BioStar Strep A OIA rapid antigen assay, group A Selective Strep Agar (ssA), and Todd-Hewitt broth cultures for the detection of group A Streptococcus in an outpatient family practice setting. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 29: 139–145

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heiter BJ, Bourbeau PP (1993) Comparison of the Gen-Probe Group A streptococcus Direct Test with culture and a rapid streptococcal antigen detection assay for diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis. J Clin Microbiol 31: 2070–2073

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heiter BJ, Bourbeau PP (1995) Comparison of two rapid streptococcal antigen detection assays with culture for diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis. J Clin Microbiol 33: 1408–1410

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaltwasser G, Diego J, Welby-Sellenriek PL et al. (1997) Polymerase chain reaction for Streptococcus pyogenes used to evaluate an optical immunoassay for the detection of group A streptococci in children with pharyngitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 16: 748–753

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pitetti RD, Drenning SD, Wald ER (1998) Evaluation of a new rapid antigen detection kit for group A beta-hemolytic streptococci. Pediatr Emerg Care 14: 396–398

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pokorski SJ, Vetter EA, Wollan PC, Cockerill FR 3rd (1994) Comparison of Gen-Probe Group A streptococcus Direct Test with culture for diagnosing streptococcal pharyngitis. J Clin Microbiol 32: 1440–1443

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roddey OF Jr, Clegg HW, Martin ES, Swetenburg RL, Koonce EW (1995) Comparison of an optical immunoassay technique with two culture methods for the detection of group A streptococci in a pediatric office. J Pediatr 126: 931–933

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roe M, Kishiyama C, Davidson K, Schaefer L, Todd J (1995) Comparison of BioStar Strep A OIA optical immune assay, Abbott TestPack Plus Strep A, and culture with selective media for diagnosis of group A streptococcal pharyngitis. J Clin Microbiol 33: 1551–1553

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schlager TA, Hayden GA, Woods WA, Dudley SM, Hendley JO (1996) Optical immunoassay for rapid detection of group A beta-hemolytic streptococci. Should culture be replaced? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 150: 245–248

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schmuziger N, Frei R, Hauser R, à Wengen D, Probst R (1996) Zuverlässigkeit von Streptokokken-A-Schnelltests. HNO 44: 365–369

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shulman ST (1994) Streptococcal pharyngitis: diagnostic considerations. Pediatr Infect Dis J 13: 567–571

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smith JM, Bauman MC, Fuchs PC (1995) An optical immunoassay for the direct detection of group A strep antigen. Lab Med 26: 408–410

    Google Scholar 

  26. Steed LL, Korgenski EK, Daly JA (1993) Rapid detection of Streptococcus pyogenes in pediatric patient specimens by DNA probe. J Clin Microbiol 31: 2996–3000

    Google Scholar 

  27. Veasy LG, Wiedmeier SE, Orsmond GS et al. (1987) Resurgence of acute rheumatic fever in the intermountain area of the United States. N Engl J Med 316: 421–427

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wald ER, Dashefsky B, Feidt C, Chiponis D, Byers C (1987) Acute rheumatic fever in western Pennsylvania and the tristate area. Pediatrics 80: 371–374

    Google Scholar 

  29. Webb KH (1998) Does culture confirmation of high-sensitivity rapid streptococcal tests make sense? A medical decision analysis. Pediatrics 101: E2

Download references

Danksagung

Wir bedanken uns herzlich für die Finanzierung dieser Studie durch einen wissenschaftlichen Kredit des Kantonsspitals Basel-Stadt und möchten darauf hinweisen, dass diese Studie firmenunabhängig finanziert wurde.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Schmuziger.

Additional information

Auszugsweise vorgestellt während der 89. Frühjahresversammlung der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, Hals- und Gesichtschirurgie in Pontresina 2002.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmuziger, N., Schneider, S. & Frei, R. Zuverlässigkeit und Praxistauglichkeit von 2 Streptokokken-A-Schnelltests. HNO 51, 806–812 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-003-0816-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-003-0816-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation