Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) ist eine chronisch entzündliche Erkrankung der inversen Hautregionen, die zunehmend auch in den Fokus der ambulanten Versorgung rückt. Früher meist chirurgisch im stationären Bereich betreut, existieren heutzutage neue Therapieoptionen, die insbesondere bei milden und mittelschweren Fällen eine effektive ambulante Betreuung ermöglichen.
Fragestellung
Es erfolgt die Darstellung der aktuellen ambulanten lokalen und apparativen Therapieoptionen unter Beleuchtung der Effektivität und des Risikos sowie der Entwicklung von Therapieempfehlungen für die Praxis.
Material und Methode
Die klinische Evidenz zu den einzelnen Behandlungsoptionen und die Analyse der aktuellen Entwicklungen zur Einschätzung der zukünftigen ambulanten HS-Betreuung in Deutschland wurde aufbereitet.
Ergebnisse
Es existieren für den ambulanten Bereich mittlerweile effektive lokale Behandlungsoptionen, die von topischem Clindamycin, Resorcinol bis zur intraläsionalen Kortikosteroidinjektion reichen. Neue apparative Verfahren wie die LAight-Therapie (Lenicura, Wiesbaden) stehen zur Verfügung, die als Monotherapie oder in Kombination mit medikamentösen oder chirurgischen Behandlungsoptionen zu einem erfolgreichen Krankheitsmanagement der milden bis mittelschweren HS führen können.
Schlussfolgerung
Eine evidenzbasierte Anwendung von topischen Therapieverfahren kann zu einer effizienteren ambulanten Behandlung von HS-Patienten führen (in der Praxis oder durch die Patienten selbst). Dies wiederum wird die Lebensqualität der HS-Patienten verbessern, insbesondere derjenigen mit rekurrierenden, milden bis mittelschweren Verläufen.
Abstract
Background
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin folds, which requires more outpatient treatment alternatives. Although the disease was previously treated using surgery, new treatment modalities now allow the effective treatment of mild and moderate cases in an ambulatory care setting.
Aim of study
Local and instrument-based therapies are presented and their efficacy and safety profiles are highlighted.
Materials and methods
Clinical evidence for each therapeutic modality are presented and current treatment developments are analyzed based on the future treatment of HS patients in Germany.
Results
Effective treatments for outpatient care of HS patients include topical clindamycin, resorcinol, and intralesional corticosteroids. New devices such as LAight therapy (combining intense pulsed light [IPL] with radiofrequency) are available, which can be used as monotherapy or adjunct therapy in combination with systemic treatment and/or surgery for the management of HS.
Conclusion
Evidence-based use of local treatments can provide more efficient outpatient and self-administered strategies, which improves the quality of life of HS patients, especially for patients with recurrent mild and moderate disease.
Literatur
Bettoli V, Manfredini M, Massoli L et al (2019) Rates of antibiotic resistance/sensitivity in bacterial cultures of hidradenitis suppurativa patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 33:930–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15332
Bisschoff IJ, Kasche D, Kirschner U et al (2020) Laight® therapy improves hidradenitis suppurativa in patients declining surgical intervention: two case reports. Acta Derm Venereol 100:1–2. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3558
Boer J, Jemec GBE (2010) Resorcinol peels as a possible self-treatment of painful nodules in hidradenitis suppurativa. Clin Exp Dermatol 35:36–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03377.x
Cassano N, Alessandrini G, Mastrolonardo M, Vena GA (1999) Peeling agents: toxicological and allergological aspects. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 13:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.1999.tb00838.x
Clemmensen OJ (1983) Topical treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa with clindamycin. Int J Dermatol 22:325–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4362.1983.tb02150.x
Docampo-Simón A, Beltrá-Picó I, Sánchez-Pujol MJ et al (2021) Topical 15 % resorcinol is associated with high treatment satisfaction in patients with mild to moderate hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000515450
Firooz A, Tehranchi-Nia Z, Ahmed AR (1995) Benefits and risks of intralesional corticosteroid injection in the treatment of dermatological diseases. Clin Exp Dermatol 20:363–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.1995.tb01351.x
Fischer AH, Haskin A, Okoye GA (2017) Patterns of antimicrobial resistance in lesions of hidradenitis suppurativa. J Am Acad Dermatol 76:309–313.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2016.08.001
García-Martínez FJ, Vilarrasa Rull E, Salgado-Boquete L et al (2019) Intralesional corticosteroid injection for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa: a multicenter retrospective clinical study. J Dermatolog Treat. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1655524
Gulliver W, Zouboulis CC, Prens E et al (2016) Evidence-based approach to the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa, based on the European guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-016-9328-5
Iwasaki J, Marra DE, Fincher EF, Moy RL (2008) Treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa with a nonablative radiofrequency device. Dermatol Surg 34:114–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.34025.x
Jemec GBE, Revuz J, Leyden JJ (2006) Hidradenitis suppurativa https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33101-8
Jemec GBE, Wendelboe P (1998) Topical clindamycin versus systemic tetracycline in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. J Am Acad Dermatol 39:971–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(98)70272-5
Jfri A, Nassim D, O’Brien E, Gulliver W, Nikolakis G, Zouboulis CC (2021) Prevalence of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis. JAMA Dermatol 2021 May 26:e211677. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1677. Online ahead of print. PMID: 34037678
Kawana S, Tachihara R, Kato T, Omi T (2010) Effect of smooth pulsed light at 400 to 700 and 870 to 1,200 nm for acne vulgaris in Asian skin. Dermatol Surg 36:52–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01380.x
Kirschner U, Lang BM, Steinbrink K, Zimmer S (2020) Effectiveness of adalimumab in combination with intense pulsed light and radiofrequency therapy (LAight®) for severe hidradenitis suppurativa: A case report. J Dermatol Dermatol Surg 24:133. https://doi.org/10.4103/jdds.jdds_36_19
Lyons AB, Townsend SM, Turk D et al (2019) Laser and light-based treatment modalities for the management of hidradenitis suppurativa. Am J Clin Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-019-00491-1
Molinelli E, Brisigotti V, Simonetti O et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of topical resorcinol 15 % as long-term treatment of mild-to-moderate hidradenitis suppurativa: a valid alternative to clindamycin in the panorama of antibiotic resistance. Br J Dermatol 183:1117–1119. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.19337
Pascual JC, Encabo B, Ruiz de Apodaca RF et al (2017) Topical 15 % resorcinol for hidradenitis suppurativa: an uncontrolled prospective trial with clinical and ultrasonographic follow-up. J Am Acad Dermatol 77:1175–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.07.008
Pasquale TR, Tan JS (2005) Nonantimicrobial effects of antibacterial agents. Clin Infect Dis 40:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1086/426545
Riis PT, Boer J, Prens EP et al (2016) Intralesional triamcinolone for flares of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS): a case series. J Am Acad Dermatol 75:1151–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2016.06.049
Sabat R, Jemec GBE, Matusiak Ł et al (2020) Hidradenitis suppurativa. Nat Rev Dis Primers. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-0149-1
Scheinfeld N (2013) Hidradenitis suppurativa: a practical review of possible medical treatments based on over 350 hidradenitis patients. Dermatol Online J 19:1. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds517
Schrader AMR, Deckers IE, Van Der Zee HH et al (2014) Hidradenitis suppurativa: a retrospective study of 846 Dutch patients to identify factors associated with disease severity. J Am Acad Dermatol 71:460–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2014.04.001
Schultheis M, Scheuern M, Radkov I (2021) Combining deroofing with LAight® therapy for long-term disease control of Hurley stage II hidradenitis suppurativa: case report. Clin Pract 11:26–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract11010005
Schultheis M, Staubach P, Nikolakis G et al (2021) LAight therapy significantly enhances treatment efficacy of topical clindamycin solution in Hurley I and II hidradenitis suppurativa: results from RELIEVE, a multicenter randomized, blinded, controlled trial. Dermatology. (in press)
Seok J, Kim JH, Kim JM et al (2019) Effects of intradermal radiofrequency treatment and intense pulsed light therapy in an acne-induced rabbit ear model. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41322-x
Spížek J, Novotná J, Řezanka T (2004) Lincosamides: chemical structure, biosynthesis, mechanism of action, resistance, and applications. Adv Appl Microbiol 56:121–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2164(04)56004-5
Theut Riis P, Saunte DM, Sigsgaard V et al (2018) Intense pulsed light treatment for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: beware treatment with resorcinol. J Dermatolog Treat 29:385–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2017.1387226
Vanlaerhoven AMJD, Ardon CB, Van Straalen KR et al (2018) Hurley III hidradenitis suppurativa has an aggressive disease course. Dermatology 234:232–233. https://doi.org/10.1159/000491547
Wilden S, Friis M, Tuettenberg A et al (2019) Combined treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa with intense pulsed light (IPL) and radiofrequency (RF). J Dermatolog Treat. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1677842
Zouboulis CC, Bechara FG, Fritz K et al (2012) S1-Leitlinie zur Therapie der Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa * (ICD-10 Ziffer: L73.2). J Ger Soc Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1610-0387.2012.08006.x
Zouboulis CC, Desai N, Emtestam L et al (2015) European S1 guideline for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 29:619–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12966
Zouboulis CC, Del Marmol V, Mrowietz U et al (2015) Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa: criteria for diagnosis, severity assessment, classification and disease evaluation. Dermatology 231:184–190. https://doi.org/10.1159/000431175
Zouboulis Id CC, Tzellos T, Kyrgidis A et al (2017) Development and validation of the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), a novel dynamic scoring system to assess HS severity. Br J Dermatol 177:1401–1409. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15748
Danksagung
Die Hochschulklinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Immunologisches Zentrum des Städtischen Klinikums Dessau ist Gesundheitsdienstleister des Europäischen Referenznetzwerkes für seltene und komplexe Hautkrankheiten (ERN Skin – ALLOCATE Skin group). EvS erhält Förderung aus dem ERA PerMed EU Projekt „Biomolecular Analyses for Tailored Medicine in AcneiNversa (BATMAN)“.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
G. Nikolakis gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. E. von Stebut hat Berater- und Vortragshonorare von Almirall, InfectoPharm, Janssen, Leo Pharma, und Novartis erhalten, die nicht mit diesem Manuskript in Verbindung stehen.
Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.
Additional information
QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nikolakis, G., von Stebut, E. Lokale und neue apparative Therapien der milden Hidradenitis suppurativa. Hautarzt 72, 676–685 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-021-04849-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-021-04849-7