Skip to main content
Log in

Prävention des Handekzems

Prevention of hand eczema

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Hautarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Handekzeme können neben anlagebedingtem Ursprung auch Ausdruck eines beruflich oder außerberuflich bedingten irritativen oder allergischen Kontaktekzems sein. Dies bietet Ansatzpunkte für sich ergänzende Maßnahmen auf der Ebene der primären, sekundären und tertiären Prävention. Im Vordergrund steht dabei die Identifikation des/der Auslöser(s) mit nachfolgender Reduktion oder Elimination der entsprechenden Exposition. Wichtige Präventionsansätze sind gesetzliche Regelungen, technische und organisatorische Maßnahmen sowie die korrekte Verwendung einer adäquaten persönlichen Schutzausrüstung (z. B. Schutzhandschuhe). Gesundheitspädagogische Interventionen können dabei das individuelle Hautschutzverhalten verbessern. Auch wenn die Evidenz zur Effektivität von Präventionsansätzen beim Handekzem begrenzt ist, haben diese besonders bei beruflicher Verursachung eine große Bedeutung, da dadurch die Entstehung einer Berufskrankheit (BK-Nr. 5101) verhindert bzw. deren Folgen gemindert werden können. In Deutschland wurde daher ein komplexes, abgestuftes Präventionskonzept für Berufsdermatosen etabliert. In den letzten Jahren konnte gezeigt werden, dass insbesondere die daran beteiligten Maßnahmen der sekundären und tertiären Individualprävention einen hohen Stellenwert haben.

Abstract

Apart from endogenous factors, hand eczema is often caused by irritant or allergic contact dermatitis related to occupational or non-occupational exposure to skin hazards. This enables several complementary approaches on the level of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention. A high priority is set on identification and subsequent reduction or elimination of causative exposures. Important preventive approaches include legal regulations, technical and organizational measures as well as correct use of adequate personal protective equipment (e.g. protective gloves). Interventions based on health education are conducted to improve individual protective behaviour. Even though evidence-based proof of effectiveness is limited, preventive measures are considered of particular importance for avoidance of occupational hand eczema and its adverse sequelae. Therefore, a complex, step-wise approach to occupational skin diseases has been established in Germany. In recent years, the positive impact of secondary and tertiary preventive measures of this approach has been demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Agner T, Held E (2002) Skin protection programmes. Contact Dermatitis 47:253–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allmers H, Schmengler J, John SM (2004) Decreasing incidence of occupational contact urticaria caused by natural rubber latex allergy in German health care workers. J Allergy Clin Immunol 114:347–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Apfelbacher CJ, Soder S, Diepgen TL et al (2009) The impact of measures for secondary individual prevention of work-related skin diseases in health care workers: 1‑year follow-up study. Contact Dermatitis 60:144–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bauer A, Ronsch H, Elsner P et al (2018) Interventions for preventing occupational irritant hand dermatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004414.pub3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brandenburg S, Woltjen M (2018) Präventionsbegriffe in der Berufsdermatologie und der gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung. Dermatol Beruf Umwelt 3:126–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brans R, Skudlik C, Weisshaar E et al (2016) Multicentre cohort study ‘Rehabilitation of Occupational Skin Diseases – Optimization and Quality Assurance of Inpatient Management (ROQ)’: results from a 3-year follow-up. Contact Dermatitis 75(4):205–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brasch J, Becker D, Aberer W et al (2014) Guideline contact dermatitis: S1-Guidelines of the German Contact Allergy Group (DKG) of the German Dermatology Society (DDG), the Information Network of Dermatological Clinics (IVDK), the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Working Group for Occupational and Environmental Dermatology (ABD) of the DDG, the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the Professional Association of German Dermatologists (BVDD) and the DDG. Allergo J Int 23:126–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bregnhoj A, Menne T, Johansen JD et al (2012) Prevention of hand eczema among Danish hairdressing apprentices: an intervention study. Occup Environ Med 69:310–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Diepgen TL, Elsner P, Schliemann S et al (2009) Guideline on the management of hand eczema ICD-10 Code: L20. L23. L24. L25. L30. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 7(Suppl 3):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  10. Diepgen TL (2012) Occupational skin diseases. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 10:297–313 (quiz 314–295)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diepgen TL, Andersen KE, Chosidow O et al (2015) Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention and treatment of hand eczema. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 13:e1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dulon M, Pohrt U, Skudlik C et al (2009) Prevention of occupational skin disease: a workplace intervention study in geriatric nurses. Br J Dermatol 161:337–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fartasch M, Taeger D, Broding HC et al (2012) Evidence of increased skin irritation after wet work: impact of water exposure and occlusion. Contact Dermatitis 67:217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fartasch M, Diepgen TL, Drexler H et al (2015) S1 guideline on occupational skin products: protective creams, skin cleansers, skin care products (ICD 10: L23, L24)—short version. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 13:594–606

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Geier J, Krautheim A, Uter W et al (2011) Occupational contact allergy in the building trade in Germany: influence of preventive measures and changing exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 84:403–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Geier J, Lessmann H, Mahler V et al (2012) Occupational contact allergy caused by rubber gloves—nothing has changed. Contact Dermatitis 67:149–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Geier J, Lessmann H, Bauer A et al (2016) Auswirkung einer arbeitsbedingten Kontaktallergie gegen Chrom(VI)-Verbindungen bei der BK 5101. Derm Beruf Umw 64:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamnerius N, Svedman C, Bergendorff O et al (2018) Wet work exposure and hand eczema among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study. Br J Dermatol 178:452–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ibler KS, Jemec GB, Diepgen TL et al (2012) Skin care education and individual counselling versus treatment as usual in healthcare workers with hand eczema: randomised clinical trial. BMJ 345. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7822

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ibler KS, Jemec GB, Flyvholm MA et al (2012) Hand eczema: prevalence and risk factors of hand eczema in a population of 2274 healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis 67:200–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kresken J, Klotz A (2003) Occupational skin-protection products—a review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76:355–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kütting B, Baumeister T, Weistenhofer W et al (2010) Effectiveness of skin protection measures in prevention of occupational hand eczema: results of a prospective randomized controlled trial over a follow-up period of 1 year. Br J Dermatol 162:362–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Löffler H, Kampf G, Schmermund D et al (2007) How irritant is alcohol? Br J Dermatol 157:74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nicholson PJ, Llewellyn D, English JS (2010) Evidence-based guidelines for the prevention, identification and management of occupational contact dermatitis and urticaria. Contact Dermatitis 63:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pedersen LK, Held E, Johansen JD et al (2005) Less skin irritation from alcohol-based disinfectant than from detergent used for hand disinfection. Br J Dermatol 153:1142–1146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Saary J, Qureshi R, Palda V et al (2005) A systematic review of contact dermatitis treatment and prevention. J Am Acad Dermatol 53:845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schliemann S, Kleesz P, Elsner P (2013) Protective creams fail to prevent solvent-induced cumulative skin irritation—results of a randomized double-blind study. Contact Dermatitis 69:363–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schliemann S, Petri M, Elsner P (2014) Preventing irritant contact dermatitis with protective creams: influence of the application dose. Contact Dermatitis 70:19–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Skudlik C, Weisshaar E, Scheidt R et al (2009) Multicenter study “Medical-Occupational Rehabilitation Procedure Skin—optimizing and quality assurance of inpatient-management (ROQ)”. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 7:122–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Skudlik C, Weisshaar E, Scheidt R et al (2012) First results from the multicentre study rehabilitation of occupational skin diseases—optimization and quality assurance of inpatient management (ROQ). Contact Dermatitis 66:140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Skudlik C, Weisshaar E (2015) Individual in-patient and out-patient prevention in occupational skin diseases. Hautarzt 66:160–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Skudlik C, John SM (2017) Berufliche Hauterkrankungen: Verursachung, Klinik und Verfahrensabläufe. Dtsch Dermatol 65:924–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Skudlik C, Weisshaar E, Ofenloch RF et al. (2017) DGUV Forum 1.2. 51–59

  34. Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Linneberg A et al (2010) The epidemiology of hand eczema in the general population—prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 62:75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tiedemann D, Clausen ML, John SM et al (2015) Effect of glove occlusion on the skin barrier. Contact Dermatitis 74:2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Uter W, Geier J, Schnuch A (2000) Downward trend of sensitization to glyceryl monothioglycolate in German hairdressers. IVDK study group. Information Network of Departments of Dermatology. Dermatology 200:132–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Uter W, Gefeller O, John SM et al (2014) Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics—a comparison of female hairdressers and clients based on IVDK 2007–2012 data. Contact Dermatitis 71:13–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. van Gils RF, Boot CR, van Gils PF et al (2011) Effectiveness of prevention programmes for hand dermatitis: a systematic review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis 64:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Visser MJ, Verberk MM, van Dijk FJ et al (2014) Wet work and hand eczema in apprentice nurses; part I of a prospective cohort study. Contact Dermatitis 70:44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Weisshaar E, Skudlik C, Scheidt R et al (2013) Multicentre study ‘rehabilitation of occupational skin diseases -optimization and quality assurance of inpatient management (ROQ)’-results from 12-month follow-up. Contact Dermatitis 68:169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wilke A, Gediga G, Schlesinger T et al (2012) Sustainability of interdisciplinary secondary prevention in patients with occupational hand eczema: a 5-year follow-up survey. Contact Dermatitis 67:208–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wilke A, Gediga K, Weinhoppel U et al (2012) Long-term effectiveness of secondary prevention in geriatric nurses with occupational hand eczema: the challenge of a controlled study design. Contact Dermatitis 66:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilke A, Gediga K, John SM et al (2014) Evaluation of structured patient education in occupational skin diseases: a systematic assessment of the disease-specific knowledge. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87:861–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wilke A, Gediga G, Goergens A et al (2018) Interdisciplinary and multiprofessional outpatient secondary individual prevention of work-related skin diseases in the metalworking industry: 1‑year follow-up of a patient cohort. Bmc Dermatol 18:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wilke A, Skudlik C, Sonsmann FK (2018) Individual prevention of occupational contact dermatitis: protective gloves and skin protection recommendations as part of the patient management scheme by the public statutory employers’ liability insurance. Hautarzt 69:449–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wulfhorst B, Bock M, Gediga G et al (2010) Sustainability of an interdisciplinary secondary prevention program for hairdressers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 83:165–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Brans.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

R. Brans und C. Skudlik geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brans, R., Skudlik, C. Prävention des Handekzems. Hautarzt 70, 797–803 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-019-4463-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-019-4463-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation