Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Qualität dermatologischer Kasuistiken in deutschsprachigen Fachzeitschriften

Die Case-Reporting(CARE)-Guideline

Quality of dermatological case reports in German-speaking journals

The Case Reporting (CARE) Guideline

  • In der Diskussion
  • Published:
Der Hautarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Saeta A et al (2016) The SCARE statement: consensus-based surgical case report guidelines. Int J Surg 34:180–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Albrecht J, Werth VP, Bigby M (2009) The role of case reports in evidence-based practice, with suggestions for improving their reporting. J Am Acad Dermatol 60:412–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bastuji-Garin S, Sbidian E, Gaudy-Marqueste C et al (2013) Impact of STROBE statement publication on quality of observational study reporting: interrupted time series versus before-after analysis. PLoS ONE 8:e64733

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG et al (2013) The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Glob Adv Health Med 2:38–43

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia-Doval I, Ingram JR, Naldi L, Anstey A (2016) Case reports in dermatology: loved by clinicians, loathed by editors, and occasionally important. Br J Dermatol 175:449–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kane RL, Wang J, Garrard J (2007) Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement. J Clin Epidemiol 60:241–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Langan S, Schmitt J, Coenraads P‑J et al (2010) The reporting of observational research studies in dermatology journals: a literature-based study. Arch Dermatol 146:534–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miguel D, Elsner P (2015) Author guidelines in dermatological journals discourage the use of the CAse REport guidelines. Br J Dermatol 173:1107–1108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miguel D, Gonzalez N, Illing T, Elsner P (2017) Reporting quality of case reports in international dermatology journals. Br J Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 152:726–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Hautkrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Erfurter Str. 35, 07743, Jena, Deutschland

    B. Schmelz &  P. Elsner

Authors
  1. B. Schmelz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Elsner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Elsner.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

B. Schmelz und P. Elsner geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmelz, B., Elsner, P. Qualität dermatologischer Kasuistiken in deutschsprachigen Fachzeitschriften. Hautarzt 69, 602–605 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-018-4147-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-018-4147-0

Search

Navigation