Skip to main content

Anatomie, Biologie, Physiologie und Grundzüge der Pathologie des Nagelorgans

Anatomy, biology, physiology and basic pathology of the nail organ

Der Hautarzt volume 65, pages 282–290 (2014)Cite this article

Zusammenfassung

Der Nagel ist das größte Hautanhangsgebilde. Er wächst lebenslang ohne Abhängigkeit von Hormonen. Der Mittelfingernagel der dominanten Hand eines jungen Erwachsenen wächst im Durchschnitt 0,1 mm/Tag, der Großzehennagel 0,03–0,05 mm/Tag. Die Form und Größe der Nägel sind von Finger zu Finger und von Zehe zu Zehe in sehr charakteristischer Weise unterschiedlich, wofür in erster Linie der Knochen der Endphalangen verantwortlich ist. Das Nagelorgan besteht aus verschiedenen epithelialen und bindegewebigen Anteilen: Das Matrixepithel bildet die Nagelplatte, das Nagelbettepithel sorgt für eine feste Haftung des Nagels, das Hyponychium ist eine hoch spezialisierte Struktur, die es erlaubt, dass sich der Nagel problemlos vom Nagelbett ablösen kann und doch kein Spalt zwischen Nagel und Nagelbett entsteht, und schließlich ist der dorsale Nagelwall für den Schutz der Nagelwurzel und die Bildung der Kutikula an seinem freien Rand für die Versiegelung der Nageltasche verantwortlich. Nagelbett und Matrix haben ein spezialisiertes Bindegewebe mit morphogenetischer Potenz. Der proximale und die lateralen Nagelwälle bilden einen nach distal offenen Rahmen für den Nagel. Der Nagel bietet Schutz für die Endphalanx und die Fingerspitze, ist ein äußerst nützliches Werkzeug zur Verteidigung und Geschicklichkeit und erhöht die Sensibilität der Fingerspitze. Nagelapparat, Fingerspitze, Sehnen und Ligamente des Endgelenkes bilden eine funktionelle Einheit und können in vieler Hinsicht nicht isoliert gesehen werden. Das Nagelorgan hat nur eine gewisse Anzahl an Erkrankungsmustern, die sich in mancher Hinsicht von denen der behaarten und der palmoplantaren Haut unterscheiden.

Abstract

The nail is the largest skin appendage. It grows continuously through life in a non-cyclical manner; its growth is not hormone-dependent. The nail of the middle finger of the dominant hand grows fastest with approximately 0.1 mm/day, whereas the big toe nail grows only 0.03–0.05 mm/d. The nails’ size and shape vary characteristically from finger to finger and from toe to toe, for which the size and shape of the bone of the terminal phalanx is responsible. The nail apparatus consists of both epithelial and connective tissue components. The matrix epithelium is responsible for the production of the nail plate whereas the nail bed epithelium mediates firm attachment. The hyponychium is a specialized structure sealing the subungual space and allowing the nail plate to physiologically detach from the nail bed. The proximal nail fold covers most of the matrix. Its free end forms the cuticle which seals the nail pocket or cul-de-sac. The dermis of the matrix and nail bed is specialized with a morphogenetic potency. The proximal and lateral nail folds form a frame on three sides giving the nail stability and allowing it to grow out. The nail protects the distal phalanx, is an extremely versatile tool for defense and dexterity and increases the sensitivity of the tip of the finger. Nail apparatus, finger tip, tendons and ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint form a functional unit and cannot be seen independently. The nail organ has only a certain number of reaction patterns that differ in many respects from hairy and palmoplantar skin.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9

Literatur

  1. Zaias N (1963) Embryology of human nail. Arch Dermatol 87:37–53

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Okada M, Nishimukai H, Okiura T, Sugino Y (2008) Lyonization pattern of normal human nails. Genes Cells 13:421–428

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morgan AM, Baran R, Haneke E (2001) Anatomy of the nail unit in relation to the distal digit. In: Krull E, Zook E, Baran R, Haneke E (Hrsg) Nail surgery: a text and atlas. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, S 1–28

  4. Berker D de, Angus B (1996) Proliferative compartments in normal nail. Br J Dermatol 135:555–559

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen PR (1996) The lunula. J Am Acad Dermatol 34:943–953

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Haneke E (2006) Surgical anatomy of the nail apparatus. Dermatol Clin 24:291–296

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ito T, Ito N, Saathoff M et al (2005) Immunology of the human nail apparatus: the nail matrix is a site of relative immune privilege. J Invest Dermatol 125:1139–1148

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Higashi N (1968) Melanocytes of nail matrix and nail pigmentation. Arch Dermatol 97:570–574

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Perrin C, Michiels JF, Pisani A, Ortonne JP (1997) Anatomic distribution of melanocytes in normal nail unit: an immunohistochemical investigation. Am J Dermatopathol 19:462–467

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De Berker D, Dawber RPR, Thody A, Graham A (1996) Melanocytes are absent from normal nail bed; the basis of a clinical dictum. Br J Dermatol 134:564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Theunis A, Richert B, Sass U et al (2011) Immunohistochemical study of 40 cases of longitudinal melanonychia. Am J Dermatopathol 33:27–34

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lacour JP, Dubois D, Pisani A, Ortonne JP (1991) Anatomical mapping of Merkel cells in normal human adult epidermis. Br J Dermatol 125:535–542

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Berker D de, Wojnarowska F, Sviland L et al (2000) Keratin expression in the normal nail unit: markers of regional differentiation. Br J Dermatol 142:89–96

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boot PM, Rowden G, Walsh N (1992) The distribution of Merkel cells in human fetal and adult skin. Am J Dermatopathol 14:391–396

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zook EG (2003) Anatomy and physiology of the perionychium. Clin Anat 16:1–8

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee K-J, Kim W-S, Lee J-H et al (2006) CD10, a marker for specialized mesenchymal cells (onychofibroblasts) in the nail unit. J Dermatol Sci 42:65–67

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee DY, Park JH, Shin HT et al (2012) The presence and localization of onychodermis (specialized nail mesenchyme) containing onychofibroblasts in the nail unit: a morphological and immunohistochemical study. Histopathology 61:123–130

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Okazaki M, Yoshimura K, Fujiwara H et al (2003) Induction of hard keratin expression in non-nail-matrical keratinocytes by nail-matrical fibroblasts through epithelial – mesenchymal interactions. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:286–290

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Frenz C, Fritsch H, Hoch J (2000) Plastination histologic investigations on the inserting pars terminalis aponeurosis dorsalis of three-sectioned fingers. Anat Anz 182:69–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McGonagle D, Tan AL, Benjamin M (2009) The nail as a musculoskeletal appendage – implications for a better understanding of the link between psoriasis and arthritis. Dermatology 218:97–102

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Baran R, Juhlin L (1986) Bone dependent nail formation. Br J Dermatol 114:371–375

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shum C, Bruno RJ, Ristic S et al (2000) Examination of the anatomic relationship of the proximal germinal nail matrix to the extensor tendon insertion. J Hand Surg Am 25:1114–1117

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Raguz JM, Haneke E (1997) Analyse der Proliferationsaktivität der Nagelmatrixzellen mit der AgNOR-Methode. Hautarzt 48(Suppl 1):S62

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cane AK, Spearman RI (1967) A histochemical study of keratinization in the domestic fowl. J Zool 153:337–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Germann H, Barran W, Plewig G (1980) Morphology of corneocytes from human nail plate. J Invest Dermatol 74:115–118

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schumacher E, Dindorf W, Dittmar M (2009) Exposure to toxic agents alters organic elemental composition in human fingernails. Sci Total Environ 407:2151–2157

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Olabanji SO, Ajose OA, Makinde NO et al (2005) Characterization of human fingernail elements using PIXE technique. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res B 240:895–907

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Min JZ, Hatanaka S, Yu H-F et al (2011) Determination of DL-amino acids, derivatized with R(-)-4-(3-isothiocyanatopyrrolidin-1-yl)-7-(N, N-dimethylaminosulfonyl)-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole, in nail of diabetic patients by UPLC-ESI-TOF-MS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 879:3220–3228

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Daniel CR III, Piraccini BM, Tosti A (2004) The nail and hair in forensic science. J Am Acad Dermatol 50:258–261

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ohno T, Sakamoto M, Kurosawa T et al (2007) Total mercury levels in hair, toenail, and urine among women free from occupational exposure and their relations to renal tubular function. Environ Res 103:191–197

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Reddy K, Lowenstein EJ (2011) Forensics in dermatology. Part II. J Am Acad Dermatol 64:811–824

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mandal BK, Ogra Y, Suzuki KT (2003) Speciation of arsenic in human nail and hair from arsenic-affected area by HPLC-inductively coupled argon plasma mass spectrometry. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 189:73–83

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Adair BM, Hudgens EE, Schmitt MT et al (2006) Total arsenic concentrations in toenails quantified by two techniques provide a useful biomarker of chronic arsenic exposure in drinking water. Environ Res 101:213–220

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Forslind B (1982) X-ray microanalysis in dermatology. Scan Electron Microsc 4:1715–1724

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vecht-Hart CM, Bode P, Trouerbach WT, Collette HJA (1995) Calcium and magnesium in human toenails do not reflect bone mineral density. Clin Chim Acta 236:1–6

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Haneke E (1987) Ketoconazol-Verweildauer in der Haut nach oraler Therapie. Hautarzt 38:93–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Haneke E (1990) Fluconazole levels in human epidermis and blister fluid. Br J Dermatol 123:273–274

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Allouche M, Hamdoum M, Mangin P, Castella V (2008) Genetic identification of decomposed cadavers using nails as DNA source. Forensic Sci Int Genet 3:46–49

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fernández-Rodríguez A, Iturralde MJ, Fernández de Simón L et al (2003) Genetic analysis of fingernail debris: application to forensic casework. International Congress Series 1239:921–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nakanishi A, Moriya F, Hashimoto Y (2003) Effects of environmental conditions to which nails are exposed on DNA analysis of them. Leg Med (Tokyo) 5(Suppl 1):S194–S197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Braun RP, Baran R, Saurat JH, Thomas L (2006) Surgical pearl: dermoscopy of the free edge of the nail to determine the level of nail plate pigmentation and the location of its probable origin in the proximal or distal nail matrix. J Am Acad Dermatol 55:512–513

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Braun RP, Baran R, Le Gal FA et al (2007) Diagnosis and management of nail pigmentations. J Am Acad Dermatol 56:835–847

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Braun RP, Oliviero M, Kolm I et al (2009) Dermoscopy: what’s new? Clin Dermatol 27:26–34

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hirata SH, Yamada S, Almeida FA et al (2005) Dermoscopy of the nail bed and matrix to assess melanonychia striata. J Am Acad Dermatol 53:884–886

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hirata SH, Yamada S, Almeida FA et al (2006) Dermoscopic examination of the nail bed and matrix. Int J Dermatol 45:28–30

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Debarbieux S, Hospod V, Depaepe L et al (2012) Perioperative confocal microscopy of the nail matrix in the management of in situ or minimally invasive subungual melanomas. Br J Dermatol 167:828–836

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen SH, Chen YL, Cheng MH et al (2003) The use of ultrasonography in preoperative localization of digital glomus tumors. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:115–119

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Drapé JL, Wolfram-Gabel W, Idy-Peretti I et al (1996) The lunula: a magnetic resonance imagining approach to the subnail matrix area. J Invest Dermatol 106:1081–1085

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. James VJ (2009) Fiber diffraction of skin and nails provides an accurate diagnosis of malignancies. Int J Cancer 125:133–138

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Tambosis E, Lim C (2012) A comparison of the contrast stains, Chicago blue, chlorazole black, and Parker ink, for the rapid diagnosis of skin and nail infections. Int J Dermatol 51:935–938

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Haneke E (2013) Krankheiten der Nägel. Hautarzt 64:519–532

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. E. Haneke gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Dermaticum Freiburg, Schlippehof 5, 79110, Freiburg, Deutschland

    E. Haneke

  2. Dermatol. Klinik Inselspital, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz

    E. Haneke

  3. Centro Dermatol Epidermis, Porto, Portugal

    E. Haneke

  4. Kliniek voor Huidziekten, Academisch Ziekenhuis, Univ. Gent, Gent, Belgien

    E. Haneke

Authors
  1. E. Haneke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Haneke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haneke, E. Anatomie, Biologie, Physiologie und Grundzüge der Pathologie des Nagelorgans. Hautarzt 65, 282–290 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-013-2702-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-013-2702-2

Schlüsselwörter

  • Nägel
  • Matrix
  • Nagelbett
  • Nagelwachstum
  • Nagelpathologie

Keywords

  • Nails
  • Matrix
  • Nail bed
  • Nail growth
  • Nail pathology