Skip to main content
Log in

Sublinguale Immuntherapie

Stand 2011

Sublingual immunotherapy

Where are we now?

  • CME Weiterbildung · Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Hautarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Allergische Erkrankungen stellen heute ein globales Problem dar. In Deutschland leiden schätzungsweise zwischen 20 und 30% aller Bundesbürger an einer allergischen Erkrankung, von denen über 40% im Alter zwischen 20 und 40 Jahren sind. Häufig beeinflussen die Krankheitssymptome das soziale Leben der Betroffenen. Beispielsweise können sie zu nächtlichen Schlafstörungen und Leistungsabfall in Beruf und Schule führen. Unbehandelte Allergien verursachen, ökonomisch betrachtet, erhebliche, aber vermeidbare Kosten für die Volkswirtschaft. Seit 100 Jahren wird die spezifische Immuntherapie (SIT) zur Behandlung IgE-vermittelter Allergien eingesetzt. Zahlreiche kontrollierte klinische Studien konnten ihre Wirksamkeit, Sicherheit und Verträglichkeit nachweisen, sodass sie heute als etablierte kausale Therapie für die allergische Rhinitis bzw. Rhinokonjunktivitis und das allergische Asthma gilt und sich auch gesundheitsökonomisch rechnet. Neben der klassischen subkutanen Applikationsform (SCIT) wird in den letzten Jahren aufgrund positiver Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit aus großen kontrollierten Studien mit Gräserpollenallergen auch die sublinguale Gabe (SLIT) bei Erwachsenen und Kindern eingesetzt.

Abstract

Allergic diseases represent a global health problem. They affect 20% to 30% of the German population, but more than 40% of the group between 20 and 40 years of age. The symptoms have a considerable influence on social life and cause an impairment of sleep and performance at work/school, leading to a high but avoidable economic impact. For over 100 years specific immunotherapy (SIT) has been used to treat IgE-mediated allergic diseases. Numerous well-controlled studies have provided evidence of its efficacy, safety and tolerability. Today SIT represents a well-established treatment of allergic rhinitis, rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma with a positive health economic impact. Initially, SIT was administered subcutaneously (SCIT), but other routes of application have been developed. In particular the sublingual-swallow method (SLIT) has been proven to be effective and well-tolerated in large studies on grass pollen allergies and represents an additional effective route of administration in adults and children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Kleine-Tebbe J (2009) Specific immunotherapy by different allergen applications: subcutaneous, sublingual, oral or rectal administration and lymph node injection. Arb Paul Ehrlich Inst Bundesamt Sera Impfstoffe Frankf A M. 96:87–95; discussion 95

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akdis CA, Akdis M (2011) Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 127:18–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Till SJ, Francis JN, Nouri-Aria K, Durham SR (2004) Mechanisms of immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 113:1025–1034

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jutel M, Akdis M, Budak F et al (2003) IL-10 and TGF-beta cooperate in the regulatory T cell response to mucosal allergens in normal immunity and specific immunotherapy. Eur J Immunol 33:1205–1214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Allam JP, Peng WM, Appel T et al (2008) Toll-like receptor 4 ligation enforces tolerogenic properties of oral mucosal Langerhans cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol 121:368–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Scadding GW, Shamji MH, Jacobson MR et al (2010) Sublingual grass pollen immunotherapy is associated with increases in sublingual Foxp3-expressing cells and elevated allergen-specific immunoglobulin G4, immunoglobulin A and serum inhibitory activity for immunoglobulin E-facilitated allergen binding to B cells. Clin Exp Allergy 40:598–606

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Durham SR, Yang WH, Pedersen MR et al (2006) Sublingual immunotherapy with once-daily grass allergen tablets: a randomized controlled trial in seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 117:802–809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Overtvelt L, Moussu H, Horiot S et al (2010) Lactic acid bacteria as adjuvants for sublingual allergy vaccines. Vaccine 28:2986–2992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfaar O, Barth C, Jaschke C et al (2010) Sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy adjuvanted with monophosphoryl lipid A: a phase I/IIa study. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 154:336–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sander I, Fleischer C, Meurer U et al (2009) Allergen content of grass pollen preparations for skin prick testing and sublingual immunotherapy. Allergy 64:1486–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Didier A, Malling HJ, Worm M et al (2007) Optimal dose, efficacy, and safety of once-daily sublingual immunotherapy with a 5-grass pollen tablet for seasonal allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 120:1338–1345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Durham SR, Emminger W, Kapp A et al (2010) Long-term clinical efficacy in grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis after treatment with SQ-standardized grass allergy immunotherapy tablet. J Allergy Clin Immunol 125:131–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bufe A, Eberle P, Franke-Beckmann E et al (2009) Safety and efficacy in children of an SQ-standardized grass allergen tablet for sublingual immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 123:167–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wahn U, Tabar A, Kuna P et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of 5-grass-pollen sublingual immunotherapy tablets in pediatric allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 123:160–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Worm M (2006) Efficacy and tolerability of high dose sublingual immunotherapy in patients with rhinoconjunctivitis. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 38:355–360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Compalati E, Passalacqua G, Bonini M, Canonica GW (2009) The efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy for house dust mites respiratory allergy: results of a GA2LEN meta-analysis. Allergy 64:1570–1579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lombardi C, Incorvaia C, Braga M et al (2009) Administration regimens for sublingual immunotherapy to pollen allergens: What do we know? Allergy 64:849–854

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Senna G, Ridolo E, Calderon M et al (2009) Evidence of adherence to allergen-specific immunotherapy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 9:544–548

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Passalacqua G, Musarra A, Pecora S et al (2007) Quantitative assessment of the compliance with once-daily sublingual immunotherapy in children (EASY project: evaluation of a novel SLIT formulation during a year). Pediatr Allergy Immunol 18:58–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Antico A, Pagani M, Crema A (2006) Anaphylaxis by latex sublingual immunotherapy. Allergy 61:1236–1237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Eifan AO, Keles S, Bahceciler NN, Barlan IB (2007) Anaphylaxis to multiple pollen allergen sublingual immunotherapy. Allergy 62:567–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cox LS, Larenas LD, Nolte H et al (2006) Sublingual immunotherapy: a comprehensive review. J Allergy Clin Immunol 117:1021–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Radulovic S, Calderon MA, Wilson D, Durham S (2010) Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD002893

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bufe A, Ziegler-Kirbach E, Stoeckmann E et al (2004) Efficacy of sublingual swallow immunotherapy in children with severe grass pollen allergic symptoms: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Allergy 59:498–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Niu CK, Chen WY, Huang JL et al (2006) Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy with high-dose mite extracts in asthma: a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study in Taiwan. Respir Med 100:1374–1383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Valovirta E, Jacobsen L, Ljørring C et al (2006) Clinical efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy with tree pollen extract in children. Allergy 61:1177–1183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Skoner D, Gentile D, Bush R et al (2010) Sublingual immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis caused by ragweed pollen. J Allergy Clin Immunol 125:660–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Alvarez-Cuesta E, Berges-Gimeno P, González-Mancebo E et al (2007) Sublingual immunotherapy with a standardized cat dander extract: evaluation of efficacy in a double blind placebo controlled study. Allergy 62:810–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wahn U, Malling HJ, Kleine-Tebbe J (2010) Sublingual immunotherapy in children – ready for prime time? Erratum in: Pediatr Allergy Immunol 21:1093

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kleine-Tebbe J, Bufe A, Ebner C et al (2009) Die spezifische Immuntherapie (Hyposensibilisierung) bei IgE-vermittelten allergischen Erkrankungen. Allergo J 18:508–537

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf folgende Beziehungen hin: Honorare für Vortrags- und Beratungstätigkeit von verschiedenen Allergenextraktherstellern (Allergopharma, ALK, Leti, Bencard, HAL, Stallergene) erhalten.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Worm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, H., Zuberbier, T. & Worm, M. Sublinguale Immuntherapie. Hautarzt 62, 467–476 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-011-2173-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-011-2173-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation