Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Syphilis und HIV-Infektion

Besonderheiten der Diagnose, Klinik und Therapie

Syphilis and HIV infection

Characteristic features of diagnosis, clinical assessment, and treatment

  • Leitthema: 100 Jahre Treponema pallidum
  • Published:
Der Hautarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Seit 2001 steigt die Inzidenz der Syphilis in Deutschland dramatisch an. Besonders betroffen ist hierbei die Gruppe der homosexuellen Männer. Bei der Behandlung von HIV-Syphilis-Koinfizierten sind einige Besonderheiten bei der Diagnostik und Therapie zu beachten. Da die Labordiagnostik oft unzuverlässig ist, muss der erfahrene Arzt die Klinik besonders berücksichtigen. Der stadienhafte Verlauf der Syphilis unterscheidet sich bei HIV-positiven Patienten im Wesentlichen nicht von HIV-negativen Patienten. Es sind allerdings vermehrt atypische und schwere Verläufe mit rascher Progredienz und ZNS-Beteiligung zu finden. Zudem kommt es häufig zu Fehldiagnosen. Die Therapie erfordert eine besondere Sorgfalt. Penicillin ist das Therapeutikum der Wahl bei allen Stadien der Syphilis bei HIV-Infektion. Allerdings wird die Wahl des Penicillinderivates insbesondere aufgrund der häufig schwierigen Stadienabgrenzung kontrovers diskutiert. Eine sichere Alternative bei Penicillinallergie besteht nicht.

Abstract

The incidence of syphilis has increased dramatically in Germany since 2001. Homosexual men have been particularly afflicted. Several characteristic features should be taken into account in the diagnosis and treatment of HIV patients with concomitant syphilis. Since laboratory analyses are frequently unreliable, the experienced physician must pay special attention to the clinical picture. The stages in the clinical course of syphilis do not differ essentially between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients. However, atypical and serious courses with rapid progression and CNS involvement are observed more frequently. Moreover, incorrect diagnoses are often reached. Treatment requires particular diligence. Penicillin is the agent of choice for all stages of syphilis in patients infected with HIV. Because the stages are often difficult to differentiate, the choice of which penicillin derivative should be administered is the subject of controversy. There is no safe alternative for patients allergic to penicillin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9
Abb. 10
Abb. 11

Literatur

  1. Berry CD, Hooton TM, Collier A, Lukehart S (1987) Neurologic relapse after benzathine penicillin therapy for secondary syphilis in a patient with HIV infection. N Engl J Med 316: 1587–1589

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brandon WR, Boulos LM, Morse A (1993) Determining the prevalence of neurosyphilis in a cohort co-infected with HIV. Int J STD AIDS 4: 99–101

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown ST, Zaidi A, Larsen SA, Reynolds GH (1985) Serological response to syphilis treatment. A new analysis of old data. JAMA 253: 1296–1299

    Google Scholar 

  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2004) Azithromycin treatment failures in syphilis infections—San Francisco, California, 2002–2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 53: 197–198

    Google Scholar 

  5. Czelusta A, Yen Moore A, Straaten M van der, Carrasco D, Tyring SK (2000) An overview of sexually transmitted diseases. Part III Sexually transmitted diseases in HIV-infected patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 3: 409–432

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dowell ME, Ross PG, Musher DM, Cate TR, Baug RE (1992) Response of latent syphilis or neurosyphilis to ceftriaxone therapy in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Med 93: 477–479

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elliot W (1976) Treatment of primary syphilis. J Am Vener Dis Assoc 3: 128–135

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fonseca E, Garcia-Silva J, Pozo J del, Yebra MT, Cuevas J, Contrer F (1999) Syphilis in an HIV-positive patient misdiagnosed as leprosy. J Cutan Pathol 1: 51–54

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gordon SM, Eaton ME, George R et al. (1994) The response of symptomatic neurosyphilis to high-dose intravenous penicillin G in patients with human immuno-deficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 331: 1469–1473

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hartmann M (2004) Therapie der Syphilis. Hautarzt 55: 215–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffmann C, Kamps B (2004) HIV.NET 2004. Steinhäuser, Wuppertal

  12. Kent CK, Wolf W, Nieri G, Wong W, Klausner JD (2003) Internet use and early syphilis infection among men who have sex with men—San Francisco, California 1999–2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 52: 1229–1232

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kingston MA, Higgins SP (2004) Audit of the management of early syphilis at North Manchester General Hospital. Int J STD AIDS 15: 352–354

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kinston MA, Higgins SP (2004) Comparison of the serological response to treatment of early syphilis in HIV positive versus HIV negative individuals. Sex Transm Infect 80: 152–153

    Google Scholar 

  15. Körber A, Dissemond J, Hillen U, Esser S (2003) HIV-positiver Patient mit multiplen Ulcerationen. Hautarzt 11: 1098–1102

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lukehart SA, Godornes C, Molini BJ et al. (2004) Macrolide resistance in Treponema pallidum in the United States and Ireland. N Eng J Med 351: 154–158

    Google Scholar 

  17. Malessa R, Agelink MW, Hengge U, Mertins L, Gastpar M, Brockmeyer NH (1996) Oligosymptomatic neurosyphilis with false negative CSF-VDRL in HIV-infected individuals. Eur J Med Res 1: 299–302

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marra CM, Maxwell CL, Smith SL et al. (2004) Cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities in patients with syphilis: association with clinical and laboratory features. J Infect Dis 189: 369–376

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marra CM, Boutin P, McArthur JC et al. (2000) A pilot study evaluating ceftriaxone and penicillin G as treatment agents for neurosyphilis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals. Clin Infect Dis 30: 540–544

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marcus U, Kiehl W, Hamouda O (2003) Zur aktuellen Entwicklung der Syphilis in Deutschland. Hautarzt 54: 1125–1130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McBroom RL, Styles AR, Chiu MJ, Clegg C, Cockerell CJ, Radolf J (1999) Secondary syphilis in persons infected with and not infected with HIV-1: a comparative immunohistologic study. Am J Dermatopathol 5: 432–441

    Google Scholar 

  22. Musher DM, Hamill RJ, Baughn RE (1990) Effect of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on the course of syphilis and on the response to treatment. Ann Int Med 113: 872–881

    Google Scholar 

  23. Myint M, Bashiri H, Harrington RD, Marra CM (2004) Relapse of secondary syphilis after benzathine penicillin G: molecular analysis. Sex Transm Dis 31: 196–199

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pao D, Goh BT, Bingham JS (2002) Management issues in syphilis. Drugs 62: 1447–1461

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parkes R, Renton A, Meheus A, Laukamm-Josten U (2004) Review of current evidence and comparison of guidelines for effective syphilis treatment in Europe. Int J STD AIDS 15: 73–88

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rekart ML, Patrick DM, Chakraborty B et al. (2003) Targeted mass treatment for syphilis with oral azithromycin. Lancet 361: 313–314

    Google Scholar 

  27. RKI (2003) Praktische Empfehlungen zur Serodiagnostik der Syphilis (Ergebnisse einer Konsensuskonferenz des RKI und der DSTDG). Epidem Bull 25: 191–192

    Google Scholar 

  28. RKI (2004) Zur Situation bei wichtigen Infektionskrankheiten: Syphilis in Deutschland 2003. Epid Bull 40: 339–348

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rolfs RT, Joesoef RM, Hendershot EF (1997) A randomised trial of enhanced therapy for early syphilis in patients with and without HIV infection. N Engl J Med 337: 307–314

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rompalo AM, Joesoef MR, O’Donnell JA et al. (2001) Clinical manifestations of early syphilis by HIV-status and gender: results of the syphilis and HIV study. Sex Transm Dis 28: 158–165

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rompalo AM, Lawlor J, Seaman P, Quinn TC, Zenilman JM, Hook EW (2001) Modification of syphilitic genital ulcer manifestations by coexistent HIV infection. Sex Transm Dis 28: 448–454

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schöfer H (2004) Syphilis. Clinical aspects of Treponema pallidum infection. Hautarzt 5: 112–119

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sellati TJ, Wilkinson DA, Sheffield JS, Koup RA, Radolf JD, Norgard MV (2000) Virulent Treponema pallidum, lipoprotein, and synthetic lipopeptides induce CCR5 on human monocytes and enhance their susceptibility to infection by human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Infect Dis 1: 283–293

    Google Scholar 

  34. Smith G, Holmann RP (2004) The prozone phenomenon with syphilis and HIV co-infection. South Med J 97: 327–328

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. H. Brockmeyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potthoff, A., Brockmeyer, N.H. Syphilis und HIV-Infektion. Hautarzt 56, 133–140 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-004-0868-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-004-0868-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation