Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ödematöse Papeln und Papulovesikel bei Mutter und Kind

Asymmetrisch an Thorax und linear an Extremitäten angeordnet

  • Wie lautet Ihre Diagnose ?
  • Published:
Der Hautarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Anand JK (1972) Caterpillar rash. Lancet 7765:1392–1395

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balit CR, Ptolemy HC, Geary MJ et al. (2001) Outbreak of caterpillar dermatitis caused by airborne hairs of the mistletoebrowntail moth (Euproctis edwardsi). Med J Aust 175:641–643

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ducombs G, Lamy M, Maleville J (1985) Processionary caterpillar dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol 3:83–84

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dunlop K, Freeman S (1997) Caterpillar dermatitis. Australas J Dermatol 38:193–195

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gardner TL, Elston DM (1997) Painful papulovesicles produced by the puss caterpillar. Cutis 60:125–126

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garty BZ, Danon YL (1985) Processionary caterpillar dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol 2:194–196

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hellier FF, Warin RP (1967) Caterpillar dermatitis. Br Med J 2:346–348

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horng CT, Chou PI, Liang JB (2000) Caterpillar setae in the deep cornea and anterior chamber. Am J Ophthalmology 129:384–385

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maier H (2002) Giftpfeilhagel und Raupendermatitis. Ärztewoche 28:3

  10. Moneo I, Vega JM, Caballero ML et al. (2003) Isolation and characterization of Tha p 1, a major allergen from the pine processionary caterpillar Thaumetopoea pityocampa. Allergy 58:34–37

    Google Scholar 

  11. Natsuaki M (2002) Immediate and delayed-type reactions in caterpillar dermatitis. J Dermatology 29:471–476

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pesce H (1967) Various facts on erucism in Chile. Bol Chil Parasitol 22:40–41

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosen T (1990) Caterpillar dermatitis. Dermatol Clin 8:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vega JM, Vega J, Vega ML et al. (2003) Skin reactions to pine processionary caterpillar. Allergy 58:87–88

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vega JM, Moneo I, Armentia A et al. (2000) Pine processionary caterpillar as a new cause of immunologic contact urticaria. Contact Dermatitis 43:129–132

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Umweltdermatologie, Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Graz

    R. Schöllnast, B. Kränke & W. Aberer

  2. Abteilung für Umweltdermatologie, Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Auenbruggerplatz 8, 8036 , Graz, Österreich

    R. Schöllnast

Authors
  1. R. Schöllnast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Kränke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. Aberer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Schöllnast.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schöllnast, R., Kränke, B. & Aberer, W. Ödematöse Papeln und Papulovesikel bei Mutter und Kind. Hautarzt 55, 480–484 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-004-0706-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-004-0706-7

Search

Navigation