Skip to main content
Log in

Aktuelle WSES-AAST-Leitlinie zu anorektalen Notfällen – Zusammenfassung und Kommentar

Current WSES-AAST guidelines on anorectal emergencies—Summary and comments

  • Leitlinien kommentiert
  • Published:
Die Chirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) und die American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) haben 2019 im Rahmen der WSES-AAST-Konsensuskonferenz in Parma, Italien die Erstauflage der Leitlinie zur Diagnostik und Therapie anorektaler Notfälle verabschiedet und 2021 publiziert. Dabei handelt es sich um die erste globale Leitlinie zu diesem für den Chirurgen so relevanten Thema. Dabei wurden sieben Erkrankungen diskutiert und die entsprechenden Therapieempfehlungen nach dem GRADE-Konzept (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) ausgesprochen.

Abstract

In 2019, the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) generated consensus recommendations for the treatment of anorectal emergencies in Parma, Italy, and published a guideline in 2021. This is the first global guideline dealing with this important topic for surgeons’ everyday work. Seven anorectal emergencies were discussed and the guideline recommendations were given according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Sorensen KM, Moller S, Qvist N (2021) Needle aspiration treatment vs. incision of acute simple perianal abscess: randomized controlled study. Int J Colorectal Dis 36(3):581–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tarasconi A et al (2021) Anorectal emergencies: WSES-AAST guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 16(1):48

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pearce L et al (2016) Multicentre observational study of outcomes after drainage of acute perianal abscess. Br J Surg 103(8):1063–1068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mocanu V et al (2019) Antibiotic use in prevention of anal fistulas following incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 217(5):910–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eke N (2000) Fournier’s gangrene: a review of 1726 cases. Br J Surg 87(6):718–728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roghmann F et al (2013) Outcome prediction in patients with Fournier’s gangrene. Urologe A 52(10):1422–1429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bozkurt O et al (2015) Evaluation of the utility of different scoring systems (FGSI, LRINEC and NLR) in the management of Fournier’s gangrene. Int Urol Nephrol 47(2):243–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Laor E et al (1995) Outcome prediction in patients with Fournier’s gangrene. J Urol 154(1):89–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong CH et al (2004) The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score: a tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections. Crit Care Med 32(7):1535–1541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sorensen MD et al (2009) Fournier’s gangrene: management and mortality predictors in a population based study. J Urol 182(6):2742–2747

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Corman JM, Moody JA, Aronson WJ (1999) Fournier’s gangrene in a modern surgical setting: improved survival with aggressive management. BJU Int 84(1):85–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Hecker.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

F. Bender, A. Tarasconi, F. Catena, M. Sartelli, F. Coccolini, J. Liese, W. Padberg, M. Reichert und A. Hecker geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bender, F., Tarasconi, A., Catena, F. et al. Aktuelle WSES-AAST-Leitlinie zu anorektalen Notfällen – Zusammenfassung und Kommentar. Chirurgie 94, 333–341 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-023-01826-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-023-01826-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation