Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anastomosentechniken in der M.-Crohn-Chirurgie – Evidenz und Neuentwicklungen

Anastomotic techniques in surgery of Crohnʼs disease—Evidence and new developments

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Darmanastomosen bei M. Crohn sind ein kontrovers diskutiertes Thema. Im Vergleich der verschiedenen Anastomosenkonfigurationen scheint die laterolaterale Anastomose nach Kono‑S die geringste Rezidivrate zu haben. Auf die Insuffizienzrate haben weder die Anastomosenkonfiguration noch das Nahtmaterial einen Einfluss. Die Komplikationsrate kann durch Verbesserung des Ernährungszustands, Kortisonreduktion, Pausierung von Biologika und eine orale präoperative Antibiotikaprophylaxe gesenkt werden.

Abstract

Intestinal anastomoses in Crohnʼs disease are controversially discussed. In a comparison of the different types of anastomotic configuration the side-to-side anastomosis according to Kono‑S seems to have the lowest recurrence rate. Neither the configuration of the anastomosis nor the suture material have an influence on the anastomotic leakage rate. The overall complication rate can be reduced by an amelioration of the nutritional status, a reduction of corticoids, pausing biologicals and an oral preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG et al (2011) Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004320.pub2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coffey CJ, Kiernan MG, Sahebally SM et al (2018) Inclusion of the mesentery in Ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease is associated with reduced surgical recurrence. J Crohns Colitis 12:1139–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ewe K, Herfarth C, Malchow H et al (1989) Postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease in relation to radicality of operation and sulfasalazine prophylaxis: a multicenter trial. Digestion 42:224–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Feng JS, Li JY, Yang Z et al (2018) Stapled side-to-side anastomosis might be benefit in intestinal resection for Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine 97:e315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Golda T, Lazzara C, Zerpa C et al (2020) Risk factors for ileocolic anastomosis dehiscence; a cohort study. Am J Surg 220:170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ikeuchi H, Kusunoki M, Yamamura T (2000) Long-term results of stapled and hand-sewn anastomoses in patients with Crohn’s disease. Dig Surg 17:493–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kono T, Ashida T, Ebisawa Y et al (2011) A new antimesenteric functional end-to-end handsewn anastomosis: surgical prevention of anastomotic recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 54:586–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kono T, Fichera A, Maeda K et al (2016) Kono‑S anastomosis for surgical prophylaxis of anastomotic recurrence in Crohn’s disease: an international multicenter study. J Gastrointest Surg 20:783–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y, Mohan H, Lan N et al (2020) Mesenteric excision surgery or conservative limited resection in Crohn’s disease: study protocol for an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Trials 21:210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lightner AL (2020) Surgery for inflammatory bowel disease in the era of biologics. J Gastrointest Surg 24:1430–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Luglio G, Rispo A, Imperatore N et al (2020) Surgical prevention of anastomotic recurrence by excluding mesentery in Crohn’s disease: the SuPREme-CD study—a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 272:210–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mcleod RS, Wolff BG, Ross S et al (2009) Recurrence of Crohn’s disease after ileocolic resection is not affected by anastomotic type: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 52:919–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muñoz-Juárez M, Yamamoto T, Wolff BG et al (2001) Wide-lumen stapled anastomosis vs. conventional end-to-end anastomosis in the treatment of Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 44:20–25 (discussion 25–26)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shimada N, Ohge H, Kono T et al (2019) Surgical recurrence at Anastomotic site after bowel resection in Crohn’s disease: comparison of Kono‑S and end-to-end anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg 23:312–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamamoto T, Nakahigashi M, Shimoyama T et al (2020) Does preoperative enteral nutrition reduce the incidence of surgical complications in patients with Crohn’s disease? A case-matched study. Colorectal Dis 22:554–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamamoto T, Shiraki M (2012) Risk factors for anastomotic complications after resection for Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 55:e346–347 (author reply e347)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zurbuchen U, Kroesen AJ, Knebel P et al (2013) Complications after end-to-end vs. side-to-side anastomosis in ileocecal Crohn’s disease—early postoperative results from a randomized controlled multi-center trial (ISRCTN-45665492). Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:467–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Krankenhaus Porz am Rhein, Urbacher Weg 19, 51149, Köln, Deutschland

    Anton J. Kroesen

Authors
  1. Anton J. Kroesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton J. Kroesen.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A.J. Kroesen gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kroesen, A.J. Anastomosentechniken in der M.-Crohn-Chirurgie – Evidenz und Neuentwicklungen. Chirurg 92, 12–15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-020-01310-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-020-01310-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation