Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Künstliche Intelligenz in der Gefäßchirurgie und Gefäßmedizin

Artificial intelligence in vascular surgery and vascular medicine

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Neue digitale Technologien werden auch in der Gefäßchirurgie an Bedeutung gewinnen, mit einem breiten Feld an Anwendungsgebieten. Die Simulation endovaskulärer Eingriffe kann zur Verbesserung prozedurenspezifischer Parameter führen und die Fluoroskopie- und Prozedurenzeit verkürzen. Die Anwendung der intraoperativen Navigation und Robotik ermöglicht ebenso eine Reduktion der Strahlendosis. Durch maschinelles Lernen könnte eine Risikostratifizierung und Individualisierung der Therapie stattfinden. Health-Apps ermöglichen, die Nachsorge der Patienten zu verbessern.

Abstract

New digital technologies will also gain in importance in vascular surgery. There is a wide field of potential applications. Simulation-based training of endovascular procedures can lead to improvement in procedure-specific parameters and reduce fluoroscopy and procedural times. The use of intraoperative image-guided navigation and robotics also enables a reduction of the radiation dose. Artificial intelligence can be used for risk stratification and individualization of treatment approaches. Health apps can be used to improve the follow-up care of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Notes

  1. Zertifiziert durch die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gefäßchirurgie und Gefäßmedizin.

Literatur

  1. Bhavnani SP et al (2017) Roadmap for innovation-ACC health policy statement on healthcare transformation in the era of digital health, big data, and precision health: a report of the American college of cardiology task force on health policy statements and systems of care. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(21):2696–2718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. See KW et al (2016) Evidence for Endovascular simulation training: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 51(3):441–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hseino H et al (2012) Skills transfer after proficiency-based simulation training in superficial femoral artery angioplasty. Simul Healthc 7(5):274–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maertens H et al (2017) A proficiency based stepwise endovascular curricular training (PROSPECT) program enhances operative performance in real life: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 54(3):387–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Saratzis A et al (2017) Role of simulation in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) training: a preliminary study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 53(2):193–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Desender L et al (2013) Patient-specific rehearsal prior to EVAR: a pilot study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 45(6):639–647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim AH et al (2016) Endovascular aneurysm repair simulation can lead to decreased fluoroscopy time and accurately delineate the proximal seal zone. J Vasc Surg 64(1):251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rudarakanchana N et al (2014) Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: technical and team training in an immersive virtual reality environment. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37(4):920–927

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Torres IO, De Luccia N (2017) A simulator for training in endovascular aneurysm repair: the use of three dimensional printers. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 54(2):247–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maertens H et al (2018) Endovascular training using a simulation based curriculum is less expensive than training in the hybrid angiosuite. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 56(4):583–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Duran C et al (2015) The model for fundamentals of endovascular surgery (FEVS) successfully defines the competent endovascular surgeon. J Vasc Surg 62(6):1660–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Markovic J et al (2012) Impact of endovascular simulator training on vascular surgery as a career choice in medical students. J Vasc Surg 55(5):1515–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maurel B et al (2012) Evaluation of radiation during EVAR performed on a mobile C‑arm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 43(1):16–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sailer AM et al (2014) CTA with fluoroscopy image fusion guidance in endovascular complex aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 47(4):349–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maurel B et al (2018) A prospective observational trial of fusion imaging in infrarenal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 68(6):1706–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de Ruiter QM, Moll FL, van Herwaarden JA (2015) Current state in tracking and robotic navigation systems for application in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 61(1):256–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mung JC et al (2013) Stereotactic endovascular aortic navigation with a novel ultrasonic-based three-dimensional localization system. J Vasc Surg 57(6):1637–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Riga C et al (2009) Initial clinical application of a robotically steerable catheter system in endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther 16(2):149–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cochennec F et al (2015) Feasibility and safety of renal and visceral target vessel cannulation using robotically steerable catheters during complex endovascular aortic procedures. J Endovasc Ther 22(2):187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baxt WG (1995) Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine. Lancet 346(8983):1135–1138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wise ES, Hocking KM, Brophy CM (2015) Prediction of in-hospital mortality after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using an artificial neural network. J Vasc Surg 62(1):8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Biehler J et al (2017) Probabilistic noninvasive prediction of wall properties of abdominal aortic aneurysms using Bayesian regression. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 16(1):45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hemmler A et al (2019) Patient-specific in silico endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: application and validation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 18(4):983–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hemmler A et al (2019) In silico study of vessel and stent-graft parameters on the potential success of endovascular aneurysm repair. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng p:e3237

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hemmler A et al (2018) A methodology for in silico endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 17(4):1139–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kordzadeh A, Esfahlani SS (2019) The role of artificial intelligence in the prediction of functional maturation of arteriovenous fistula. Ann Vasc Dis 12(1):44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ross EG et al (2016) The use of machine learning for the identification of peripheral artery disease and future mortality risk. J Vasc Surg 64(5):1515–1522.e3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dickten H, Kratsch C, Reiz B (2019) Die künstliche Intelligenz in der Einzelzellgenomik. Gefässchirurgie 24:523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-019-00572-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wongvibulsin S et al (2019) Connected health technology for cardiovascular disease prevention and management. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 21(6):29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mousa AY et al (2019) Results of telehealth electronic monitoring for post discharge complications and surgical site infections following arterial revascularization with groin incision. Ann Vasc Surg 57:160–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gefäß- und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Visceral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland

    S. Wolk &  C. Reeps FEBVS

  2. Gefäß- und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland

    M. Kleemann

Authors
  1. S. Wolk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Kleemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Reeps FEBVS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Reeps FEBVS.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

S. Wolk, M. Kleemann und C. Reeps geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolk, S., Kleemann, M. & Reeps, C. Künstliche Intelligenz in der Gefäßchirurgie und Gefäßmedizin. Chirurg 91, 195–200 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-020-01143-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-020-01143-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation