Skip to main content

Anwendung des daVinci-Robotersystems in der Thoraxchirurgie

Application of the da Vinci robotic system in thoracic surgery

Der Chirurg volume 84, pages 643–650 (2013)Cite this article

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die neueste technische Weiterentwicklung in der minimal-invasiven Thoraxchirurgie ist durch die roboterassistierten Operationsverfahren charakterisiert. Die roboterassistierte Thymektomie gilt in diesem Teilbereich als die am weitesten entwickelte Methode.

Methoden

Es wurden eine systematische Literaturrecherche (PubMed, Medline) durchgeführt und Datenbanken von Intuitive Surgical (Sunnyvale, CA, USA) analysiert. Zielkriterien der Analyse waren die quantitativen Daten im zeitlichen Verlauf, technische Vorteile und limitierende Faktoren der roboterassistierten Thoraxchirurgie.

Ergebnisse

Seit 2001 wird das daVinci-Robotersystem in der Thoraxchirurgie eingesetzt. Bis einschließlich 2012 wurden weltweit 10.895 roboterassistierte Lobektomien durchgeführt; 12 ektope, im Mediastinum gelegene Nebenschilddrüsen wurden reseziert und publiziert. Weiterhin wurden mehr als 3500 roboterassistierte Thymektomien vorgenommen. Besonders für die Thymektomie und Lungenresektion ist ein schneller Anstieg der Operationszahlen nachweisbar.

Diskussion

Die Akzeptanz der roboterassistierten Thymektomie bei Myasthenie und/oder Thymom sowie anderen mediastinalen Tumoren wächst schnell. Auch für die anatomischen Lungenresektionen bei Lungenkarzinom ist die roboterassistierte Hilus- und Lymphknotendissektion aufgrund dieser neuen Qualität der offenen Operationstechnik inzwischen vergleichbar. Die Grundlage bilden die intrinsischen technischen Vorteile des daVinci-Robotersystems.

Abstract

Introduction

The latest technical developments of minimally invasive thoracic surgery are characterized by robotic-assisted operative procedures. Robotic-assisted thymectomy is the most advanced method in this field.

Methods

A systematic literature search (PubMed, Medline) was carried out and the databank system of Intuitive Surgical (Sunnyvale, CA) was analysed. Target criteria were the analysis of the quantitative data over time, technical advantages and limiting factors of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery.

Results

The da Vinci robotic system has been used in thoracic surgery since 2001, and up to 2012 a total of 10,895 robotic-assisted lobotomies have been carried out worldwide. A total of 12 ectopic parathyroid glands in the mediastinum were resected and published. Furthermore, more than 3,500 cases of robotic-assisted thymectomy were performed. A rapid increase in the number of operations has occurred particularly for thymectomy and lung resections.

Discussion

Acceptance of robotic-assisted thymectomy for myasthenia and/or thymoma and mediastinal tumors is growing rapidly. For anatomic lung resection in lung cancer, robotic-assisted hilar and lymph node dissection due to this new quality are also comparable to open surgical techniques. The principles form the intrinsic technical advantages of the da Vinci robotic system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Walker WS, Carnochan FM, Pugh GC (1993) Thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy. Early operative experience and preliminary clinical results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 106:1111–1117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kirby TJ, Rice TW (1993) Thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 56:784–786

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jang HJ, Lee HS, Park SY et al (2011) Comparison of the early robot-assisted lobectomy experience to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: a single-institution case series matching study. Innovations (Phila) 6:305–310

    Google Scholar 

  4. McKenna RJ Jr, Houck W, Fuller CB (2006) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 81:421–426

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagahiro I, Andou A, Aoe M et al (2001) Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 72:362–365

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ng CS, Wan S, Hui CW et al (2006) Video-assisted thoracic surgery for early stage lung cancer – can short-term immunological advantages improve long-term survival? Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 12:308–312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Melfi FM, Mussi A (2008) Robotically assisted lobectomy: learning curve and complications. Thorac Surg Clin 18:289–295, vi-vii

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kernstine KH (2008) The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies with three-field lymphadenectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 22:2102

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Castle SL, Kernstine KH (2008) Robotic-assisted thymectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20:326–331

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Park BJ, Melfi F, Mussi A et al (2012) Robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): long-term oncologic results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143:383–389

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruckert JC, Ismail M, Swierzy M et al (2008) Minimally invasive thymus surgery. Chirurg 79:18, 20–15

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ismail M, Maza S, Swierzy M et al (2010) Resection of ectopic mediastinal parathyroid glands with the da Vinci robotic system. Br J Surg 97:337–343

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cao C, Manganas C, Ang SC et al (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis on pulmonary resections by robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1:7

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ruckert JC, Ismail M, Swierzy M et al (2008) Thoracoscopic thymectomy with the da Vinci robotic system for myasthenia gravis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1132:329–335

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marulli G, Schiavon M, Perissinotto E et al (2013) Surgical and neurologic outcomes after robotic thymectomy in 100 consecutive patients with myasthenia gravis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145:730–735 (discussion 735–736)

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New technology and health care costs – the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 363:701–704

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cundy TP, Shetty K, Clark J et al (2013) The first decade of robotic surgery in children. J Pediatr Surg 48:858–865

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Swanson SJ, Herndon JE 2nd, D’Amico TA et al (2007) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802 – a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study. J Clin Oncol 25:4993–4997

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Park JS, Kim HK, Choi YS et al (2011) Unplanned conversion to thoracotomy during video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy does not compromise the surgical outcome. World J Surg 35:590–595

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Farjah F, Wood DE, Mulligan MS et al (2009) Safety and efficacy of video-assisted versus conventional lung resection for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:1415–1421

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Louie BE, Farivar AS, Aye RW et al (2012) Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases. Ann Thorac Surg 93:1598–1604 (discussion 1604–1595)

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Skylizard L et al (2011) Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142:740–746

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Veronesi G, Galetta D, Maisonneuve P et al (2010) Four-arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 140:19–25

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dylewski MR, Ohaeto AC, Pereira JF (2011) Pulmonary resection using a total endoscopic robotic video-assisted approach. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 23:36–42

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Boffa DJ, Kosinski AS, Paul S et al (2012) Lymph node evaluation by open or video-assisted approaches in 11,500 anatomic lung cancer resections. Ann Thorac Surg 94:347–353

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bulkley GB, Bass KN, Stephenson GR et al (1997) Extended cervicomediastinal thymectomy in the integrated management of myasthenia gravis. Ann Surg 226:324–335

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mulder DG, Graves M, Herrmann C (1989) Thymectomy for myasthenia gravis: recent observations and comparisons with past experience. Ann Thorac Surg 48:551–555

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gross M (1993) Innovations in surgery. A proposal for phased clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:351–354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Goldstein SD, Yang SC (2010) Assessment of robotic thymectomy using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg 89:1080–1086

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Minnich DJ (2011) Starting a robotic program in general thoracic surgery: why, how, and lessons learned. Ann Thorac Surg 91:1729–1737

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Murthy SC (2013) Niche for a technology or technology for a niche? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145:737

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Alesina PF, Moka D, Mahlstedt J et al (2008) Thoracoscopic removal of mediastinal hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands: personal experience and review of the literature. World J Surg 32:224–231

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Park BJ, Flores RM (2008) Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18:297–300, vii

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ruckert JC, Swierzy M, Ismail M (2011) Comparison of robotic and nonrobotic thoracoscopic thymectomy: a cohort study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141:673–677

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yoshino I, Hashizume M, Shimada M et al (2001) Thoracoscopic thymomectomy with the da Vinci computer-enhanced surgical system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122:783–785

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Veronesi G, Agoglia BG, Melfi F et al (2011) Experience with robotic lobectomy for lung cancer. Innovations (Phila) 6:355–360

    Google Scholar 

  37. Augustin F, Bodner J, Wykypiel H et al (2011) Initial experience with robotic lung lobectomy: report of two different approaches. Surg Endosc 25:108–113

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gharagozloo F, Margolis M, Tempesta B et al (2009) Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg 88:380–384

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Giulianotti PC, Buchs NC, Caravaglios G et al (2010) Robot-assisted lung resection: outcomes and technical details. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 11:388–392

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee HS, Kim J, Lee HJ et al (2012) Transoral robotic surgery for neurogenic tumors of the prestyloid parapharyngeal space. Auris Nasus Larynx 39:434–437

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Meyer M, Gharagozloo F, Tempesta B et al (2012) The learning curve of robotic lobectomy. Int J Med Robot 8:448–452

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Augustin F, Schmid T, Sieb M et al (2008) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 85:768–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Freeman RK, Ascioti AJ, Van Woerkom JM et al (2011) Long-term follow-up after robotic thymectomy for nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis. Ann Thorac Surg 92:1018–1022

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schneiter D, Tomaszek S, Kestenholz P et al (2013) Minimally invasive resection of thymomas with the da Vinci(R) surgical system. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 43:288–292

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Melfi F, Fanucchi O, Davini F et al (2012) Ten-year experience of mediastinal robotic surgery in a single referral centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41:847–851

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bodner J, Profanter C, Prommegger R et al (2004) Mediastinal parathyroidectomy with the da Vinci robot: presentation of a new technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:1831–1832

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Karpinski S, Sardi A (2005) Thoracoscopic resection of a mediastinal intrathymic parathyroid adenoma. Am Surg 71:1070–1072

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Timmerman GL, Allard B, Lovrien F et al (2008) Hyperparathyroidism: robotic-assisted thoracoscopic resection of a supernumary anterior mediastinal parathyroid tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:76–79

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Brunaud L, Ayav A, Bresler L et al (2008) Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopy for primary hyperparathyroidism: a new application in endocrine surgery. J Chir (Paris) 145:165–167

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chan AP, Wan IY, Wong RH et al (2010) Robot-assisted excision of ectopic mediastinal parathyroid adenoma. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 18:65–67

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Harvey A, Bohacek L, Neumann D et al (2011) Robotic thoracoscopic mediastinal parathyroidectomy for persistent hyperparathyroidism: case report and review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:e24–e27

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yadav R, Mohammed TL, Neumann DR et al (2010) Case of the season: ectopic parathyroid adenoma in the pericardium: a report of robotically assisted minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Semin Roentgenol 45:53–56

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Boffa DJ, Allen MS, Grab JD et al (2008) Data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery database: the surgical managment of primary lung tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:247–254

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gopaldas RR, Bakaeen FG, Dao TK et al (2010) Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy lobectomy in a cohort of 13,619 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 89:1563–1570

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung der ethischen Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. M. Ismail, M. Swierzy, M. Ulrich und J.C. Rückert geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Allgemein-, Visceral-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland

    M. Ismail, M. Swierzy, M. Ulrich &  J.C. Rückert

Authors
  1. M. Ismail
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Swierzy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Ulrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J.C. Rückert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.C. Rückert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ismail, M., Swierzy, M., Ulrich, M. et al. Anwendung des daVinci-Robotersystems in der Thoraxchirurgie. Chirurg 84, 643–650 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2502-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2502-3

Schlüsselwörter

  • Roboter-Thoraxchirurgie
  • Roboter-Lobektomie
  • Roboter-Thymektomie
  • daVinci-Robotersystem
  • Kosten der Roboter-Chirurgie

Keywords

  • Robotic thoracic surgery
  • Robotic lobectomy
  • Robotic thymectomy
  • da Vinci robotic system
  • Costs of robotic surgery