Skip to main content

Prothetische Gefäßzugänge für die Hämodialyse

Vascular grafts as access for hemodialysis

Der Chirurg volume 83, pages 785–792 (2012)Cite this article

Zusammenfassung

Arteriovenöse Dialysezugänge unter Verwendung von Gefäßprothesen haben eine niedrigere Offenheitsrate und höhere Komplikationsrate als solche mit körpereigenen Gefäßen und stellen deshalb insbesondere bei ungeeigneten oder verbrauchten oberflächlichen Armvenen eine sekundäre oder tertiäre Option des Gefäßzuganges dar. Bei guter Planung unter Beachtung der patientenspezifischen Besonderheiten, sorgfältigem operativem Vorgehen und adäquater Behandlung auftretender Komplikationen können bei einer Vielfalt möglicher Konfigurationen von Protheseninterponaten zwischen Arterie und einer meist tiefen Vene über Jahre funktionsfähige Gefäßzugänge geschaffen werden. So haben diese prothetischen Gefäßzugänge weiterhin ihre Berechtigung, werden bei zunehmender Komorbidität der Patienten eher an Bedeutung zunehmen und sind einem getunnelten Vorhofkatheter für die dauerhafte Hämodialyse unbedingt vorzuziehen. Der vorliegende Beitrag stellt die Indikationen, operativen Möglichkeiten und Besonderheiten prothetischer Dialysezugänge dar.

Abstract

Prosthetic arteriovenous grafts have an inferior patency rate and greater morbidity than those with autogenous vessels and are therefore considered as secondary or tertiary vascular access for hemodialysis in patients with fatigued or unsuitable superficial arm veins. Prior access planning in accordance of patient characteristics, careful operative procedure and appropriate revision of complications can ensure long-term functioning of a vascular access using a large variety of possible prosthetic conduits. Arteriovenous grafts remain essential in vascular access surgery and their role may be increasing with higher comorbidities of patients and should be preferred to tunnelled cuffed catheters. This article reviews the indications, alternative configurations and characteristics of arteriovenous grafts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8

Literatur

  1. Antoniou GA, Lazarides MK, Georgiadis GS et al (2004) Lower-extremity arteriovenous access for haemodialysis: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 38:365–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bacchini G, Del Vecchio L, Andrulli S et al (2001) Survival of prosthetic grafts of different materials after impairment of a native arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis patients. ASAIO J 47:30–33

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Basile C, Konner K, Lomonte C (2012) The haemodialysis arteriovenous graft: is a new era coming? Nephrol Dial Transplant 27:876–878

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brescia MJ, Cimino JE, Appel K et al (1966) Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med 275:1089–1092

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carsten CG 3rd (2011) Lower extremity arteriovenous hemodialysis access: an important adjunct in select patients. Semin Vasc Surg 24:102–107

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chemla ES, Morsy M, Anderson L et al (2006) Complex bypasses and fistulas for difficult hemodialysis access: a prospective, single-center experience. Semin Dialysis 19:246–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chemla ES, Nelson S, Morsy M (2011) Early cannulation grafts in straight axillo-axillary angioaccesses avoid central catheter insertions. Semin Dial 24:456–459

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dammers R, Planken RN, Pouls KP et al (2003) Evaluation of 4-mm to 7-mm versus 6-mm prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop access for hemodialysis: results of a randomized multicenter clinical trial. J Vasc Surg 37:143–148

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davidson I, Hackerman C, Kapadia A et al (2009) Heparin bonded hemodialysis e-PTFE grafts result in 20% clot free survival benefit. J Vasc Access 10:153–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Georgiadis GS, Lazarides MK, Lambidis CD et al (2005) Use of short PTFE segments (< 6 cm) compares favorably with pure autologous repair in failing or thrombosed native arteriovenous fistulas. J Vasc Surg 41:76–81

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gradman WS, Laub J, Cohen W (2005) Femoral vein transposition for arteriovenous hemodialysis access: improved patient selection and intraoperative measures reduce postoperative ischemia. J Vasc Surg 41:279–284

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huber TS, Carter JW, Carter RL et al (2003) Patency of autogenous and polytetrafluoroethylene upper extremity arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses: a systematic review. J Vasc Surg 38:1005–1011

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hurlbert SN, Mattos MA, Henretta JP et al (1998) Long-term patency rates, complications and cost-effectiveness of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts for hemodialysis access: a prospective study that compares Impra versus Gore-tex grafts. Cardiovasc Surg 6:652–656

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kakkos SK, Andrzejewski T, Haddad JA et al (2008) Equivalent secondary patency rates of upper extremity Vectra Vascular Access Grafts and transposed brachial-basilic fistulas with aggressive access surveillance and endovascular treatment. J Vasc Surg 47:407–414

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaufman JL, Garb JL, Berman JA et al (1997) A prospective comparison of two expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for linear forearm hemodialysis access: does the manufacturer matter? J Am Coll Surg 185:74–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Klee U, Mistry H, Brar R et al (2012) Innovationen von Dialyseshuntprothesen. Gefässchirurgie 17:106–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krueger U, Zanow J, Scholz H (2002) Computational fluid dynamics and vascular access. Artif Organs 26:571–575

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumbar L, Karim J, Besarab A (2012) Surveillance and monitoring of dialysis access. Int J Nephrol 2012:649735

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lemson S, Tordoir JH, Ezzahiri R et al (2002) Hemodynamics of venous cuff interposition in prosthetic arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Blood Purif 20:557–562

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McAllister TN, Maruszewski M, Garrido SA et al (2009) Effectiveness of haemodialysis access with an autologous tissue-engineered vascular graft: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet 373:1440–1446

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morosetti M, Cipriani S, Dominijanni S et al (2011) Basilic vein transposition versus biosynthetic prosthesis as vascular access for hemodialysis. J Vasc Surg 54:1713–1719

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. O’shea SI, Lawson JH, Reddan D et al (2003) Hypercoagulable states and antithrombotic strategies in recurrent vascular access site thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 38:541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Polo JR, Ligero JM, Diaz-Cartelle J et al (2004) Randomized comparison of 6-mm straight grafts versus 6- to 8-mm tapered grafts for brachial-axillary dialysis access. J Vasc Surg 40:319–324

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scholz H, Zanow J, Petzold K et al (1999) Five years‘ experience with an arteriovenous patch prosthesis as access for hemodialysis. In: Henry M (Hrsg) Vascular access for hemodialysis VI. Precept Press, Chicago, S 241–254

  25. Sorom AJ, Hughes CB, McCarthy JT et al (2002) Prospective, randomized evaluation of a cuffed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft for hemodialysis vascular access. Surgery 132:135–140

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Staramos DN, Lazarides MK, Tzilalis et al (2000) Patency of autologous and prosthetic arteriovenous fistulas in elderly patients. Eur J Surg 166:777–781

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tordoir J, Canaud B, Haage et al (2007) EBPG on Vascular Access. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22(Suppl 2):88–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zanow J, Kruger U, Petzold M et al (2005) Arterioarterial prosthetic loop: a new approach for hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 41:1007–1012

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zanow J, Kruger U, Scholz H (2006) Proximalization of the arterial inflow: a new technique to treat access-related ischemia. J Vasc Surg 43:1216–1221

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zanow J, Kruger U, Settmacher U et al (2010) Treatment of perigraft seroma in expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts by sequential fibrin sealing of the outer graft surface. Ann Vasc Surg 24:1005–1014

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seinen Koautor an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07743, Jena, Deutschland

    J. Zanow & U. Settmacher

Authors
  1. J. Zanow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. U. Settmacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Zanow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zanow, J., Settmacher, U. Prothetische Gefäßzugänge für die Hämodialyse. Chirurg 83, 785–792 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-012-2304-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-012-2304-z

Schüsselwörter

  • Gefäßzugang
  • Hämodialyse
  • Arteriovenös
  • Prothese
  • Indikationen

Keywords

  • Vascular access
  • Hemodialysis
  • Arteriovenous
  • Graft
  • Indications