Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

DISPACT-Studie: Vergleichbar hohe Fistelraten nach Verwendung von Klammernahtgerät vs. Handnaht

Die Pankreasfistel bleibt ein relevantes Problem nach Pankreaslinksresektion

DISPACT study: comparably high fistula rate after stapler versus hand-sewn closure

Pancreatic fistula remains a relevant problem following distal pancreatectomy

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I et al (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 377:1514–1522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    O. Strobel &  M.W. Büchler

Authors
  1. O. Strobel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M.W. Büchler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.W. Büchler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strobel, O., Büchler, M. DISPACT-Studie: Vergleichbar hohe Fistelraten nach Verwendung von Klammernahtgerät vs. Handnaht. Chirurg 83, 178–179 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2270-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2270-x

Search

Navigation