Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stellenwert von Lymphknotendissektionen

Vieler Fragen würdig

Importance of lymph node dissection

Worthy of many questions

  • Kommentar
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Hölzel D, Eckel R, Emeny R, Engel J (2010) Distant metastases do not metastasize. Cancer Metastasis Rev 29:737–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hölzel D, Eckel R, Engel J (2008) Colorectal cancer metastasis: Frequency, prognosis, and consequences. Chirurg 80(4):331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gervasoni JE Jr, Sbayi S, Cady B (2007) Role of lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of solid tumors: An update on the clinical data. Ann Surg Oncol 14(9):2443–2462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yachida S, Jones S, Bozic I et al (2010) Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature 467(7319):1114–1117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK (1985) The will rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med 312(25):1604–1608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Namm J, Ng M, Roy-Chowdhury S et al (2008) Quantitating the impact of stage migration on staging accuracy in colorectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 207(6):882–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu CW, Hsiung CA, Lo SS et al (2005) Stage migration influences on stage-specific survival comparison between d1 and d3 gastric cancer surgeries. Eur J Surg Oncol 31(2):153–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hölzel D, Emeny R, Engel J (2011) True local recurrences do not metastasize. Cancer Metastasis Rev 30:161–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong SL, Ji H, Hollenbeck BK et al (2007) Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer. JAMA 298(18):2149–2154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hofstädter F, Hölzel D (2008) Was leisten tumorregister für die qualitätssicherung in der onkologie? Onkologe 14:1220–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tumorregister München. www.tumorregister-muenchen.de

  12. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K et al (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: Complete mesocolic excision and central ligation – technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11(4):354–364; discussion 364-355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Engel J, Kerr J, Eckel R et al (2005) Quality of treatment in routine care in a population sample of rectal cancer patients. Acta Oncol 44(1):65–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tumorregister München, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 81377, München, Deutschland

    D. Hölzel & J. Engel

Authors
  1. D. Hölzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Engel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Hölzel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hölzel, D., Engel, J. Stellenwert von Lymphknotendissektionen. Chirurg 82, 1106–1108 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2118-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2118-4

Search

Navigation