Zusammenfassung
Offenchirurgische Zugänge zum Abdomen gehören trotz wachsender Bedeutung der minimal-invasiven Zugangsverfahren zu den elementaren Techniken, die der allgemeine und viszerale Chirurg beherrschen muss. Die Art und Lokalisation des geplanten Eingriffes bestimmt maßgeblich die Wahl des Zuganges. Die folgende Arbeit gibt eine Übersicht über den derzeitigen Stand der Literatur und die chirurgischen Erfahrungen in der Auswahl und Anwendung abdominalchirurgischer Zugänge.
Abstract
Although minimally invasive approaches to the abdominal cavity are becoming increasingly more important, open surgical techniques are still of essential interest and must be mastered by general and visceral surgeons. The choice of the particular approach depends on the specificity and location of the scheduled procedure. The following article is intended to give an overview on the current literature as well as experiences in the field of open surgical approaches to the abdominal cavity.
Literatur
Flament JB (2006) Functional anatomy of the abdominal wall. Chirurg 77:401–407
Hoer J et al (2002) Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirurg 73:474–480
Rath AM et al (1996) The abdominal linea alba: an anatomo-radiologic and biomechanical study. Surg Radiol Anat 18:281–288
Grassel D et al (2005) Anisotropy of human linea alba: a biomechanical study. J Surg Res 124:118–125
Seiler CM et al (2009) Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCTN60734227). Ann Surg 249:913–920
Grantcharov TP, Rosenberg J (2001) Vertical compared with transverse incisions in abdominal surgery. Eur J Surg 167:260–267
Burger JW, Riet M van’t, Jeekel J (2002) Abdominal incisions: techniques and postoperative complications. Scand J Surg 91:315–321
Brown SR, Goodfellow PB (2005) Transverse verses midline incisions for abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD005199
Kehlet H (2008) Fast-track colorectal surgery. Lancet 371:791–793
Mudge M, Hughes LE (1985) Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 72:70–71
Culbertson EJ et al (2011) Loss of mechanical strain impairs abdominal wall fibroblast proliferation, orientation, and collagen contraction function. Surgery 150:410–417
Ellis H, Gajraj H, George CD (1983) Incisional hernias: when do they occur? Br J Surg 70:290–291
Sauerland S et al (2004) Obesity is a risk factor for recurrence after incisional hernia repair. Hernia 8:42–46
Seiler CM, Diener MK (2010) Which abdominal incisions predispose for incisional hernias? Chirurg 81:186–191
Wilkinson CS, Enkin MW (2002) Peritoneal non-closure at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD000163
Hoer J et al (2002) Prevention of incisional hernia. Chirurg 73:881–887
Weiland DE, Bay RC, Del Sordi S (1998) Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis. Am J Surg 176:666–670
Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T (2000) The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 231:436–442
Rucinski J et al (2001) Closure of the abdominal midline fascia: meta-analysis delineates the optimal technique. Am Surg 67:421–426
Riet M van’t et al (2002) Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg 89:1350–1356
Gupta H et al (2008) Comparison of interrupted versus continuous closure in abdominal wound repair: a meta-analysis of 23 trials. Asian J Surg 31:104–114
Diener MK et al (2010) Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 251:843–856
Berretta R et al (2010) Randomised prospective study of abdominal wall closure in patients with gynaecological cancer. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 50:391–396
Anderson ER, Gates S (2004) Techniques and materials for closure of the abdominal wall in caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004663
Jenkins TR (2003) It’s time to challenge surgical dogma with evidence-based data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:423–427
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dittmar, Y., Rauchfuss, F., Ardelt, M. et al. Abdominelle Zugänge und Bauchdeckenverschluss. Chirurg 82, 1067–1074 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2114-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2114-8