Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Implementierung des eLearning-Projekts NESTOR

Ein Netzwerk für Studierende der Traumatologie und Orthopädie

Implementation of the eLearning project NESTOR

A network for students in traumatology and orthopedics

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die moderne internetgestützte Informationstechnologie bietet herausragende Möglichkeiten, das Lehrangebot für Studierende ansprechend zu gestalten und zu verbessern. So entstand das webbasierte Lehrangebot NESTOR (Netzwerk für Studierende der Traumatologie und Orthopädie) als Ergänzung der Präsenzlehre in den Fächern Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie der Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

Material und Methoden

Es wurde ein themenbasiertes Datenbanksystem als Kombination aus Videos, Podcasts, radiologischen Fällen, virtuellen Patienten, Wissenstests und Studieninformationen entwickelt. Nach Fertigstellung wurden Evaluationen unter Studierenden durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

NESTOR bietet vielfältige Möglichkeiten zum Wissenserwerb. Das Angebot wurde von den Studierenden sehr gut aufgenommen, wobei 82,4% mit dem bestehenden Angebot sehr zufrieden waren und 95,3% der Nutzer einen künftigen Einsatz in der Lehre befürworteten. Den integrierten Lernansatz mit kombinierter Online- und Präsenzlehre bewerteten 93,5% positiv. Das Projekt wurde mit dem Qualitätssiegel eLearning der Charité ausgezeichnet.

Schlussfolgerung

Elektronische Lehrangebote wie das Projekt NESTOR stellen auch in der Lehre der Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie eine zeitgemäße Wissensvermittlung dar, die von Studierenden als integrierter Lernansatz sehr geschätzt werden.

Abstract

Background

Modern internet-based information technologies offer great possibilities to create and improve teaching methods for students. The eLearning tool NESTOR (Network for Students in Traumatology and Orthopedics) presented here was designed to complement the existing clinical teaching in orthopedics and traumatology at the Charité, University Medicine Berlin.

Materials and methods

Using a learning management system, videos, podcasts, X-ray diagnosis, virtual patients, tests and further tools for learning and study information were combined. After implementation the eLearning project was evaluated by students.

Results

The NESTOR project offers various possibilities for knowledge acquisition. Students using the program voluntarily showed a high acceptance whereby 82.4% were very satisfied with the contents offered and 95.3% supported the idea of a future use of NESTOR in teaching. The blended learning approach was positively evaluated by 93.5% of the students. The project received the eLearning seal of quality of the Charité University Medicine Berlin.

Conclusion

Using complex eLearning tools, such as the NESTOR project represents a contemporary teaching approach in the teaching of traumatology and orthopedics and should be offered in a blended learning context as they are well accepted by students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Armstrong P, Elliott T, Ronald J et al (2009) Comparison of traditional and interactive teaching methods in a UK emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med 16:327–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhatti I, Jones K, Richardson L et al (2009) E learning versus lecture: Which is the best approach to surgical teaching? Colorectal Dis e12

  3. Boulos MN, Maramba I, Wheeler S (2006) Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med Educ 6:41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Broadbend R (2002) ABCs of e-learning: reaping the benefits and avoiding the pitfalls. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco

  5. Citak M, Haasper C, Behrends M et al (2007) A web-based e-learning tool in academic teaching of trauma surgery. First experiences and evaluation results. Unfallchirurg 110:367–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Devitt P, Palmer E (1999) Computer-aided learning: an overvalued educational resource? Med Educ 33:136–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gesundheit N, Brutlag P, Youngblood P et al (2009) The use of virtual patients to assess the clinical skills and reasoning of medical students: initial insights on student acceptance. Med Teach 31:739–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gormley GJ, Collins K, Boohan M et al (2009) Is there a place for e-learning in clinical skills? A survey of undergraduate medical students‘ experiences and attitudes. Med Teach 31:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gray K, Tobin J (2010) Introducing an online community into a clinical education setting: a pilot study of student and staff engagement and outcomes using blended learning. BMC Med Educ 10:6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Greenhalgh T (2001) Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. BMJ 322:40–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Handal B, Groenlund C, Gerzina T (2010) Dentistry students‘ perceptions of learning management systems. Eur J Dent Educ 14:50–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartmann AC, Cruz PD Jr (1998) Interactive mechanisms for teaching dermatology to medical students. Arch Dermatol 134:725–728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heye T, Kurz P, Eiers M et al (2008) A radiological case collection with interactive character as a new element in the education of medical students. Rofo 180:337–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hull P, Chaudry A, Prasthofer A et al (2009) Optimal sequencing of bedside teaching and computer-based learning: a randomised trial. Med Educ 43:108–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Huwendiek S, Köpf S, Höcker B et al (2006) Fünf Jahre Erfahrung mit dem curricularen Einsatz des fall- und webbasierten Lernsystems „CAMPUS-Pädiatrie“ an der Medizinischen Fakultät Heidelberg. GMS Z Med Ausbild 23

  16. Levesque DR, Kelly G (2002) Meeting the challenge of continuing education with eLearning. Radiol Manage 24:40–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lewin LO, Singh M, Bateman BL et al (2009) Improving education in primary care: development of an online curriculum using the blended learning model. BMC Med Educ 9:33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Masie E (2002) Blended learning: the magic is in the mix. In: Rossett A (Hrsg) The ASTD E-Learning Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, S 58–63

  19. Matthes G, Rixen D, Tempka A et al (2009) Ärzte in der Unfallchirurgie – unglücklich und vom Aussterben bedroht? Ergebnisse einer Umfrage. Unfallchirurg 112:218–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rajendran PR (2001) The Internet: ushering in a new era in of medicine. JAMA 285:804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ridgway PF, Sheikh A, Sweeney KJ et al (2007) Surgical e-learning: validation of multimedia web-based lectures. Med Educ 41:168–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Romanov K, Nevgi A (2007) Do medical students watch video clips in eLearning and do these facilitate learning? Med Teach 29:484–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM (2006) The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med 81:207–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shantikumar S (2009) From lecture theatre to portable media: students‘ perceptions of an enhanced podcast for revision. Med Teach 31:535–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wahlgren CF, Edelbring S, Fors U et al (2006) Evaluation of an interactive case simulation system in dermatology and venereology for medical students. BMC Med Educ 6:40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Walcher F, Dreinhofer KE, Obertacke U et al (2008) Entwicklung des Lernzielkatalogs „Muskuloskelettale Erkrankungen, Verletzungen und traumatische Notfälle“ für Orthopädie-Unfallchirurgie im Medizinstudium. Unfallchirurg 111:670–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Woltering V, Herrler A, Spitzer K et al (2009) Blended learning positively affects students‘ satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: results of a mixed-method evaluation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 14:725–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Xeroulis GJ, Park J, Moulton CA et al (2007) Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students: a randomized controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback. Surgery 141:442–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ziegler R, Knopp W, Hohenberg G et al (2009) MEC.O – Medical education online: Ein Schlüssel zur Wissenserweiterung in der unfallchirurgischen Studentenausbildung im Rahmen der neuen Approbationsordnung für Ärzte. GMS Med Inform Biom Epidemiol 5(1):Doc04

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenskonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Berlin, Scharnhorststr. 13, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland

    D.A. Back

  2. Julius Wolff Institut, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Deutschland

    D.A. Back

  3. Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland

    N. Haberstroh, E. Hoff, N.P. Haas & C. Perka

  4. Dieter Scheffner Fachzentrum für medizinische Hochschullehre und evidenzbasierte Ausbildungsforschung, Kompetenzbereich eLearning, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Deutschland

    J. Plener

  5. Abteilung für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    G. Schmidmaier

Authors
  1. D.A. Back
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Haberstroh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Hoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Plener
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N.P. Haas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C. Perka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. G. Schmidmaier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D.A. Back.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Back, D., Haberstroh, N., Hoff, E. et al. Implementierung des eLearning-Projekts NESTOR. Chirurg 83, 45–53 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2102-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2102-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation