Skip to main content
Log in

Kolorektale Adenome: Pro endoskopische Abtragung

Colorectal adenoma: pro-endoscopic removal

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Kolonadenome sind häufig; sie werden beispielsweise bei ca. 20% der Vorsorgekoloskopien gefunden. Die Entfernung kann endoskopisch oder chirurgisch erfolgen. Endoskopische Resektionsverfahren (Schlingenpolypektomie, Mukosaresektion, Submukosadissektion) zeichnen sich durch hohe Erfolgsraten sowie ein akzeptables Komplikationsrisiko aus. Bei großen Polypen besteht ein relevantes Risiko für Adenomrezidive, wobei auch diese meist endoskopisch therapiert werden können. Aufgrund der geringeren Invasivität der endoskopischen Resektion sowie auch aus logistischer und gesundheitsökonomischer Sicht besteht zum primären endoskopischen Therapieansatz bei der Entfernung von Kolonadenomen keine Alternative.

Abstract

Colorectal adenomas are frequent and are detected in about 20% of screening colonoscopies. Adenoma resection can be performed endoscopically or surgically. Endoscopic resection techniques include snare polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Endoscopic treatment of colorectal adenomas is highly effective and shows acceptable complication rates. After resection of large adenomas the recurrence rate is substantial. However endoscopic retreatment of recurrent events is mostly successful. Considering the minimally invasive nature of endoscopic resections and concerning logistic and economic aspects, endoscopic resection is the treatment of choice for colorectal adenomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Bokemeyer B, Bock H, Hüppe D et al (2009) Screening Colonocopy for colon cancer prevention: results from a German online registry on 269000 cases. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:650–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brenner H, Altenhofen L, Hofmeister M (2010) Estimated long-term effects of the initial 6 years of the German screening colonoscopy program. Gastrointest Endosc 72:784–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG et al (2002) Endoscopic resection of large sessile colonic polyps by specialist and non-specialist endoscopists. Br J Surg 89:1020–1024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Conio M, Bianchi S, Repici A et al (2010) Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 53:919–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Conio M, Repici A, Demarquay JF et al (2004) EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 60:234–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferrara F, Luigiano C, Ghersi S et al (2010) Efficacy, safety and outcomes of „inject and cut“ endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile and flat colorectal polyps. Digestion 82:213–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hochdörffer R, Eickhoff A, Apel D et al (2010) Endoscopic resection of „giant“ colorectal lesions: long-term outcome and safety. Z Gastroenterol 48:741–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Iseki K et al (2000) Endoscopic piecemeal resection with submucosal saline injection of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 51:697–700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kato H, Haga S, Endo S et al (2001) Lifting of lesions during endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of early colorectal cancer: implications for the assessment of resectability. Endoscopy 33:568–573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Luigiano C, Consolo P, Scaffidi MG et al (2009) Endoscopic resection for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps: a single center experience with long-term follow-up. Endoscopy 41:829–835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Puli SR, Kakugawa Y, Gotoda T et al (2009) Meta-analysis and systematic review of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection. World J Gastroenterol 15:4273–4277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T et al (2010) Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 24:343–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y et al (2009) A multi-center retrospective study of 1,111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (ESD). Gastrointest Endosc 69(5):AB114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmiegel W, Reinacher-Schick A, Arnold D et al (2008) Update S3-guideline „colorectal cancer“ 2008. Z Gastroenterol 46:799–840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Swan MP, Bourke MJ, Alexander S (2009) Large refractory colonic polyps: is it time to change our practice? A prospective study of the clinical and economic impact of a tertiary referral colonic mucosal resection and polypectomy service. Gastrointest Endosc 70:1128–1136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Probst.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Probst, A., Messmann, H. Kolorektale Adenome: Pro endoskopische Abtragung. Chirurg 82, 514–519 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-010-2063-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-010-2063-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation