Skip to main content
Log in

Minimal-invasive Kinderchirurgie

Minimally invasive pediatric surgery

  • CME Weiterbildung · Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

In den letzten Jahren wurden in der minimal-invasiven Kinderchirurgie große Fortschritte erzielt. In zahlreichen Studien wurde die sichere Durchführbarkeit für ein breites Spektrum laparoskopischer und thorakoskopischer Eingriffe im Kindesalter belegt. Zudem konnte gezeigt werden, dass minimal-invasive Operationen auch bei Kindern mit einer verminderten Morbidität, einer kürzeren Krankenhausverweildauer, besseren Kosmetik bei reduzierten Narben, geringeren Kosten und der konventionellen Chirurgie vergleichbaren Resultaten verbunden sind. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die bereits etablierten Verfahren den durchführbaren, aber noch nicht etablierten Prozeduren gegenübergestellt. Durch Abhandlung von potenziellen hämodynamischen, respiratorischen und organspezifischen Auswirkungen des verwendeten CO2-Pneumoperitoneums sowie der Vorstellung spezieller logistischer Vorraussetzungen, soll der Leser in der Indikationsstellung und Entscheidungsfindung minimal-invasiver Operationen im Kindesalter unterstützt werden.

Abstract

In recent years minimally invasive surgical techniques in children have made substantial progress. The feasibility and safety of a wide spectrum of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures have been confirmed in numerous studies. Moreover, it was reported that minimally invasive pediatric surgery is associated with lower morbidity, a shorter hospital stay, lower costs, better cosmetics and clinical results similar to those achieved by open surgery. The present article reviews information on established as well as feasible but not yet established surgical procedures. The discussion of potential hemodynamic, respiratory and organ perfusion effects of the CO2 pneumoperitoneum and the notation of special logistic aspects should support the reader in the process of decision-making to schedule infants and children for minimally invasive surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Bannister CF, Brosius KK, Wulkan M (2004) The effect of insufflation pressure on pulmonary mechanics in infants during laparoscopic surgical procedures. Paediatr Anaesth 13:785–789

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chan KL, Hui WC, Tam PK (2005) Prospective randomized single-center, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic vs open repair of pediatric inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 19:927–932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Engum SA (2007) Minimal access thoracic surgery in the pediatric population. Semin Pediatr Surg 16:14–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Georgeson KE, Robertson DJ (2004) Minimally invasive surgery in the neonate: review of current evidence. Semin Perinatol 28:212–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gómez Dammeier BH, Karanik E, Glüer S et al (2005) Anuria during pneumoperitoneum in infants and children: a prospective study. J Pediatr Surg 40:1454–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iwanaka T, Arai M, Yamamoto H et al (2003) No incidence of port-site recurrence after endosurgical procedure for pediatric malignancies. Pediatr Surg Int 19:200–203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanna GB, Kimber C, Cuschieri A (1999) Ergonomics of task performance in endoscopic surgery; In: Bax NMA, Georgeson KE, Najmaldin A, Valla JS (eds) Endoscopic Surgery in children, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 35–48

  8. Holcomb GW 3rd, Tomita SS, Haase GM et al (1995) Minimally invasive surgery in children with cancer. Cancer 76:121–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holcomb GW, Georgeson KE (2005) Laparoscopy. In: Ashcraft KW, Holcomb GW, Murphy JP (eds) Pediatric Surgery, 4th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 673–696

  10. McHoney MC, Corizia L, Eaton S et al (2006) Laparoscopic surgery in children is associated with an intraoperative hypermetabolic response. Surg Endosc 20:452–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Metzelder ML, Jesch N, Dick A et al (2006) Impact of prior surgery on the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for children: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 20:1733–1737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Metzelder ML, Kuebler JF, Shimotakahara A et al (2007) Role of diagnostic and ablative minimally invasive surgery for pediatric malignancies. Cancer 109:2343–2348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Metzelder ML, Kuebler JF, Reismann M et al (2009) Prior thoracic surgery has a limited impact on the feasibility of consecutive thoracoscopy in children: a prospective study on 228 procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:S63–S66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Neuhaus SJ, Watson DI (2004) Pneumoperitoneum and peritoneal surface changes: a review. Surg Endosc 18:1316–1322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Olmi S, Magnone S, Bertolini A, Croce E (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 19:1193–1195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pacilli M, Pierro A, Kingsley C et al (2006) Absorption of carbon dioxide during laparoscopy in children measured using a novel mass spectrometric technique. Br J Anaesth 97:215–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Podkamenev VV, Stalmakhovich VN, Urkov PS et al (2002) Laparoscopic surgery for pediatric varicoceles: Randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Surg 37:727–729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rothenberg S (2005) Thoracoscopy in infants and children. In: Ashcraft KW, Holcomb GW, Murphy JP (eds) Pediatric Surgery, 4th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 371–382

  19. Sartorelli KH, Partrick D, Meagher DP Jr (1996) Port-site recurrence after thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary metastasis owing to osteogenic sarcoma. J Pediatr Surg 31:1443–1444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Spurbeck WW, Davidoff AM, Lobe TE et al (2004) Minimally invasive surgery in pediatric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 11:340–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. St Peter SD, Holcomb GW 3rd, Calkins CM et al (2006) Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 244:363–370

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sumpelmann R, Schuerholz T, Marx G et al (2006) Haemodynamic, acid-base and blood volume changes during prolonged low pressure pneumoperitoneum in rabbits. Br J Anaesth 96:563–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ure BM, Schmidt AI, Jesch NK (2005) Thoracoscopic surgery in infants and children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 15:314–318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ure BM, Suempelmann R, Metzelder MM, Kuebler J (2007) Physiological responses to endoscopic surgery in children. Semin Pediatr Surg 16:217–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.L. Metzelder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Metzelder, M., Ure, B. Minimal-invasive Kinderchirurgie. Chirurg 81, 71–82 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-009-1847-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-009-1847-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation