Skip to main content
Log in

Systemische Behandlungsmöglichkeiten der Peritonealkarzinose

Systemic treatment of peritoneal metastases

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die peritoneale Dissemination von Tumorzellen ist bei zahlreichen Tumorentitäten von entscheidender prognostischer Bedeutung – sowohl in der Limitation der Möglichkeit einer Heilung als auch als Manifestation einer Metastasierung. Da der peritoneale Befall häufig mit schwerwiegenden klinischen Symptomen verbunden ist, die eine Einschränkung der Lebensqualität zur Folge haben, ist ein optimales Management erforderlich, bei dem die systemische Chemotherapie eine entscheidende Rolle spielt – insbesondere, da sie ein wesentlicher Teil der Behandlungsstrategie bei systemisch metastasierten Tumorerkrankungen ist. Auch wenn davon auszugehen ist, dass sich die Wirkung der Systemtherapie zwischen den verschiedenen Lokalisationen nicht wesentlich unterscheidet, lässt die Datenlagen keine eindeutige Einschätzung über die Wirkung bei ausschließlich peritonealen Manifestationen zu. Neue systemische Substanzen sowie deren Verwendung in multimodalen Konzepten (systemische Chemotherapie, intraperitoneale Therapie plus chirurgische Zytoreduktion) müssen daher in klinische Studien integriert werden.

Abstract

Peritoneal metastases are common in metastatic disease of many tumour types and thus are determinant for prognosis and development of tumour-related symptoms that jeopardise quality of life. Systemic chemotherapy has proven efficacious in improving both prognosis and quality of life in numerous tumour types and should therefore be considered as part of the treatment strategy – although there is no large body of data from predefined cohorts with“only peritoneal” manifestation. In further clinical trials therefore, improvement of systemic chemotherapy by integration of novel agents should be implemented in multimodal treatment approaches combining systemic treatment, cytoreductive surgery, and intraperitoneal treatment strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L et al. (2006) Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. New Engl J Med 354: 34–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold D, Schmoll HJ (2006) Intraperitoneale Chemotherapie. In: Kompendium internistische Onkologie. 3. Aufl. Springer, Heidelberg New York, S 1061–1069

  3. Arnold D, Schmoll HJ (2006) Kolorektales Karzinom. In: Kompendium internistische Onkologie. 3. Aufl. Springer, Heidelberg New York, S 3787–3937

  4. Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken D et al. (2005) Phase III randomised comparison of gemcitabine (GEM) versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Proc ECCO 13, Abstr PS11

  5. Folprecht G, Lutz MP, Rougier P et al. (2007) Effect of systemic chemotherapy in patients with known peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. Proc Gastroint Cancer Symp 2007

  6. Folprecht G, Cunningham D, Ross P et al. (2004) Efficacy of 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A pooled analysis of clinical trials. Ann Oncol 15: 1330–1338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Glehen O, Mohamed F, Gilly FN (2004) Peritoneal carcinomatosis from digestive tract cancer: new management by cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia. Lancet Oncol 5: 219–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg RM, Koehne CH, Seymour MT et al. (2007) A pooled safety and efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status (PS) on outcomes in nine first-line treatment (rx) trials (cts) of 6,286 patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Proc ASCO, Abstr. 4011

  9. Heinemann V, Hinke A, Boeck S et al. (2007) Gemcitabine-based combinations (gem+x) vs gemcitabine (gem) alone in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta- analysis of sixteen randomized trials. Proc ASCO 2007, abstr 4515

  10. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W et al. (2003) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Köhne CH, Cunningham D, Ci CF et al. (2002) Clinical determinants of survival in patients with 5-fluorouracil-based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a multivariate analysis of 3825 patients. Ann Oncol 13: 308–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF et al. (1996) Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel in patients with stage III and IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 334: 1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Minsky BD, Mies C, Rich TA et al. (1988) Potentially curative surgery of colon cancer: Patterns of failure and survival. J Clin Oncol 6: 106–118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitry E, Douillard JY, Van Cutsem E (2004) Predictive factors of survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: an individual data analysis of 602 patients included in irinotecan phase III trials. Ann Oncol 15: 1013–1017

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moehler M, Eimermacher A, Siebler J et al. (2005) Randomised phase II evaluation of irinotecan plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (ILF) vs 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and etoposide (ELF) in untreated metastatic gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 92: 2122–2128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J et al. (2007) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25: 1960–1966

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Parmer MK, Ledermann JA, Colombo N et al. (2003) ICON and AGO Collaborators. Paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: the ICON4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 trial. Lancet 21: 2099–2106

    Google Scholar 

  18. Qu ZB, Liu LX (2006) Management of pseudomyxoma peritonei. World J Gastroenterol 12: 6124–6127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saltz L, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E et al. (2007) Bevacizumab (Bev) in combination with XELOX or FOLFOX4: Updated efficacy results from XELOX-1/ NO16966, a randomized phase III trial in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer. Proc ASCO, Abstr 4028

  20. Shah IA, Jayram L, Gani OS et al. (1998) Papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum in a man. A case report. Cancer 82: 860–866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sugarbaker PH (1998) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery for the prevention and treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis and sarcomatosis. Semin Surg Oncol 14: 254–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Swerdlow M (1959) Mesothelioma of the pelvic peritoneum reassembly papillary cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary: case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 77: 197–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Truong LD, Maccato ML, Awalt H et al. (1990) Serous surface carcinoma of the peritoneum: a clinicopathologic study of 22 cases. Hum Pathol 21: 99–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Cutsem E, Mowacki M, Lang I et al. (2007) Randomized phase III study of irinotecan and 5-FU/FA with or without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): The CRYSTAL trial. Proc ASCO, Abstr 4000

  25. Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S et al. (2006) Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 24: 4991–4997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Verwaal VJ, Ruth S van, Bree E de et al. (2003) Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 15: 3737–3743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. White CD (1993) Papillary intraperitoneal neoplasia resembling ovarian carcinoma after removal of benign ovaries. W V Med J 89: 282–283

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf folgende Beziehung/en hin: Referententätigkeit für Pfizer, Roche, Merck, Sanofi-Aventis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Arnold.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arnold, D., Lordick, F. Systemische Behandlungsmöglichkeiten der Peritonealkarzinose. Chirurg 78, 1117–1122 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-007-1435-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-007-1435-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation