Skip to main content
Log in

Plastisch-chirurgische Korrekturen der Körperform – Rekonstruktion und Ästhetik

Teil II: Facelift, periorbitale Chirurgie, Mammaaugmentation und Mammareduktion

Plastic surgical body form correction

Part II: face-lift, periorbital surgery, and breast augmentation and reduction

  • CME Weiterbildung • Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Mit der Verschiebung der Alterspyramide ist die Nachfrage an verjüngenden Eingriffen stetig gewachsen. Die umfangreichen anatomischen Studien der letzten Jahre haben uns in der Chirurgie des alternden Gesichts und der Mamma ein besseres Verständnis der anatomischen Strukturen und die Grundlage für die Alterungsprozesse gegeben. Hieraus resultiert eine Vielzahl von neuen Eingriffen, die dem Chirurgen im Vorfeld zur Verfügung stehen. Die Kenntnis dieser anatomischen Grundlagen, die als Basis der Alterungsprozesse anzusehen sind, und die Diversität an chirurgischen Eingriffen erlauben die Wiederherstellung eines natürlich wirkenden jugendlichen Gesichts, bei dem weniger die Straffung als die Neupositionierung der Gewebe im Vordergrund steht.

Bei der Blepharoplastik haben die Techniken in der Vergangenheit im Wesentlichen die Zeichen des Alterungsprozesses im Sinne einer Camouflage verändert, weniger handelte es sich bei diesen Eingriffen um eine wirkliche anatomische Restauration. Mit den modernen Blepharoplastiktechniken werden eine Umverteilung von Fettgewebe und eine anatomische Restauration der alternden Strukturen angestrebt. Hierdurch werden stabile Langzeitergebnisse erzielt und sekundäre Stigmata vermieden.

Auch im Bereich der Mammachirurgie haben sich Konzepte durchgesetzt, die ein möglichst natürliches Ergebnis erzielen, dies gilt vor allem für die Augmentation. Obwohl es keine einzelne Technik gibt, die man als die beste bezeichnen kann, gibt es doch für jeden Patienten mit seiner ganz individuellen Anatomie und seinen persönlichen Wünschen die für ihn am besten geeignete Technik.

Abstract

The demand for a younger appearance is increasing as the average age of the population increases. Extensive anatomic studies in recent years have improved for facial and breast reconstruction the understanding of anatomic structures and the basis of the aging process. Numerous new surgical techniques have resulted. This understanding of the anatomy of aging and the diversity of surgical methods have made the attainment of naturally young facial appearance more easily possible, in which repositioning of the tissue plays a more important role than lifting. In the past, plastic surgery of the eyelids aimed primarily at hiding the aging process, not at true anatomic restoration. Modern techniques in this field aim more toward redistribution of fatty tissues and the anatomic restoration of aging structures. In this way long-term results are stabilized and secondary stigmata can be avoided. New concepts have also been established in breast surgery that allow more natural results, particularly in augmentation. Although no single method may be designated as superior, there still exists an optimal technique suited to every patient’s anatomy and personal wishes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9
Abb. 10
Abb. 11

Literatur

  1. Koblenzer S (1996) Psychological aspects of aging and the skin. Clin Dermatol 14: 171–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker S (2005) Rhytidectomy In: Cummings CW, Flint PW, Harken LA et al. (eds) Otolaryngology: Head & Neck Surgery. 4th edn. Elsevier Philadelphia PA, pp 714–749

  3. Bettman AG (1920) Plastic & cosmetic surgery of the face. NW Medicine 19: 205–209. Reprinted in Aesth Plast Surg 1988; 12: 5–7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adamson P, Litner J (2005) Evolution of rhytidectomy techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin 13: 383–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Skoog T (1974) Plastic Surgery: New Methods. W.B. Saunders Philadelphia PA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mitz V, Peyronie M (1976) The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid & cheek areas. Plast Reconst Surg 58: 80–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamra ST (1990) The deep plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconst Surg 86: 53–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamra ST (1992) Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconst Surg 90: 1–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman O (2005) Changes associated with the aging face. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am 13: 371–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mendelson BC, Muzaffar AR, Adams WP (2002) Surgical anatomy of the midcheek and malar mounds. Plast Reconst Surg 110: 885–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Little JW (2000) Three-dimensional rejuvenation of the midface: volumetric resculpture by malar imbrication. Plast Reconst Surg 105: 267–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Quatela VC, Graham D, Sabini P (2002) Rejuvenation of the brow and midface In: Papel ID, Frodel J, Holt GR et al. (eds) Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2nd edn. Thieme Medical Publishers New York, pp 171–184

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang TD (1989) Rhytidectomy for treatment of the aging face. Mayo Clin Proc 64: 780–790

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamer F, Frankel A (1998) SMAS rhytidectomy versus deep plane rhytidectomy: an objective comparison. Plast Reconst Surg 102: 878–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bermann M (2002) Rejuvenation of the upper eyelid complex with autologous fat transplantation. Dermatol Surg 26: 1113–1116

    Google Scholar 

  16. Castro E, Foster JA (1999) Upper lid blepharoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 15: 173–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Friedland JA, Jacobsen WM, Terkonda S (1996) Safety and efficacy of combined upper blepharoplasties and open coronal browlift: A consecutive series of 600 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 20: 453–462

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guyuron B, Knize DM (2001) Corrugator supercilii resection trough blepharoplasty incision. Plast Reconstr Surg 107: 606–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee Y, Lee E, Park WJ (2000) Anchor epicanthoplasty combined with out-fold type double eylidplasty for Asians: do we have to do an additional scar to correct the Asian epicanthal fold? Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 1872–1880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Januszkiewicz A, Essen P, McNurlan MA et al. (2000) In vivo protein synthesis of circulating human T lymphocytes does not respond to a cortisol challenge within 24 h. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 44: 202–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JW, Lee JO (1998) Asian blepharoplasty with a short-pulsed contact Nd-Yag laser: limited-incision resectable laser double fold with internal medial and lateral functional epicanthoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 22: 433–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee Y, Kwon S, Hwang K (2001) Correction of sunken and/or multiply folded upper eyelid by fascia-fat graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 107: 15–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee Y, Lee E, Park WJ (2000) Anchor epicanthoplasty combined with out-fold type double eyelidplasty for Asians: do we have to make an additional scar to correct the Asian epicanthal fold? Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 1872–1880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ullmann Y, Levi Y, Ben-Izhak O et al. (1997) The surgical anatomy of the fat in the upper eyelid medial compartment. Plast Reconstr Surg 99: 658–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weber PJ, Wulc AE, Foster J (1999) Transconjunctival upper blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 104: 2333–2334. No abstract available

    Google Scholar 

  26. Alster TS, Lupton JR (2001) An overview of cutaneous laser resurfacing. Clin Plast Surg 28: 37–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bernardi C, Dura S, Amata PL (1998) Treatment of orbicularis oculi muscle hypertrophy in lower lid blepharoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 22: 349–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Castro E, Foster JA (1999) Upper lid blepharoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 15: 173–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Codner MA (2000) Reduction of lower palpebral bulge by plicating attenuated orbital septa: a technical modification in cosmetic blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 2559–2560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mommaerts MY, De Riu G (2000) Prevention of lid retraction after lower lid blepharoplasties: an overview.J Craniomaxillofac Surg 28: 189–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ngyen XC (2000) Guidelines to avoid lid retraction following lower transcutaneous blepharoplasty. Int J Cosmetic Surg Aesthetic Dermatol 2: 231–233

    Google Scholar 

  32. Eremia S, Newman N (2000) Use of an insulated ultrafine-point electrocautery for transconjunctival blepharoplasty of the lower eyelids. Dermatol Surg 27: 1052–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ghabrial R, Lisman RD, Kane MA et al. (1998) Diplopia following transconjunctival blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 102: 1219–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kavouni A, Stanek JJ (2002) Lower eyelid cysts following transconjunctival blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 109: 400–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Seckel BR, Kovanda CJ, Cetrulo CL Jr et al. (2000) Laser blepharoplasty with transconjunctival orbicularis muscle/septum tightening and periocular skin resurfacing: a safe and advantageous technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 106: 1127–1141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zarem HA, Resnick JI (1999) Expanded applications for transconjunctival lower lid blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 103: 1041–1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. American Society of Plastic Surgeons National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Statistics (2002) Cosmetic Surgery Trends, 1992 to 2001: Published Results. Arlington Heights, Ill: American Society of Plastic Surgeons

  38. Muzaffer AR, Rohrich RJ (2001) The silicone gel-filled breast implant controversy: An update. Plast Reconstr Surg 109: 742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Angell, M (1996) Shattuck lecture: evaluating the health risks of breast implants: The interplay of medical science, the law, and public opinion. N Engl J Med 334: 1513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Barnard JJ, Todd EL, Wilson WG et al. (1997) Distribution of organosilicon polymers in augmentation mammaplasties at autopsy. Plast Reconstr Surg 100: 197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Deapen DM, Pike MC, Casagrande JT et al. (1986) The relationship between breast cancer and augmentation mammaplasty: an epidemiologic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 77: 361–367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rohrich RJ, Hollier LH, Robinson JB (1996) Determining the safety of the silicone envelope: In search of a silicone antibody. Plast Reconstr Surg 98: 455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Su CW, Dreyfuss DA, Krizek TJ et al. (1995) Silicone implants and the inhibition of cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 96: 513

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Heden P, Jernbeck J, Hober M (2001) Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants. Clin Plast Surg 28: 531

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hakelius L, Ohlsen L (1992) A clinical comparison of the tendency to capsular contracture between smooth and textured gel-filled silicone mammary implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 90: 247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pollack H (1993) Breast capsular contracture: A retrospective study of textured versus smooth silicone implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 91: 404

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Spear SL, Elmaraghy M, Hess C (2000) Textured-surface saline-filled silicone breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 1542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mladick RA (1993) „No-touch“ submuscular saline breast augmentation technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 17: 183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wong Ch, Samuel M, Tan BK, Song C (2006) Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 46: 481–484

    Google Scholar 

  50. Spear SL (2001) Breast augmentation with reduced-height anatomic implants: The pros and cons. Clin Plast Surg 28: 561

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hammond DC (2000) Breast augmentation using anatomic implants. Oper Tech Plast Reconstr Surg 7: 125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hamas RS (1999) The postoperative shape of round and tear drop saline-filled breast implants. Aesthetic Surg J 19: 369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Spear SL, Mardini S (2001) Alternative filler materials and new implant designs: What’s available and what’s on the horizon? Clin Plast Surg 28: 435

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Spear SL, Beckenstein M (1998) The periareolar approach to augmentation mammaplasty. In: Spear SL (ed) Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia PA

  55. Neifert M, DeMarzo S, Seacat J et al. (1990)The influence of breast surgery, breast appearance, and pregnancy-induced breast changes on lactation sufficiency as measured by infant weight gain. Birth 17: 31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hurst NM (1996) Lactation after augmentation mammaplasty. Obstet Gynecol 87: 30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Spear SL, Beckenstein M (1998) The inframammary approach to augmentation mammaplasty. In: Spear SL (ed) Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia PA

  58. Pound EC III, Pound EC Jr (2001) Transumbilical breast augmentation (TUBA): Patient selection, technique, and clinical experience. Clin Plast Surg 28: 597

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Biggs TM, Yarish RS (1990) Augmentation mammaplasty: a comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 85: 368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Silverstein MJ, Handel N, Gamagami P (1991) The effect of silicone gel-filled implants on mammography. Cancer 68: 1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Spear SL, Bulan EJ (2001) The medial periareolar approach to submuscular augmentation mammaplasty under local anesthesia: a 10-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 108: 771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Hidalgo DA (2000) Breast augmentation: choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 2202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implantsoft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107: 1255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Khouri RK, SchlenzI, Murphy BJ, Baker TJ (2000) Nonsurgical breast enlargement using an external soft-tissue expansion system. Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 2500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Pitanguy I (1967) Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy. Br J Plast Surg 20: 78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. McKissock PK (1972) Reduction mammaplasty with a vertical dermal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 49: 245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM (1977) Reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 59: 500

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Robbins TH (1997) A reduction mammaplasty with the areola-nipple based on an inferior dermal pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 59: 64

    Google Scholar 

  69. Balch CR (1981) The central mound technique for reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 67: 305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Labandter HP, Dowden RV, Dinner MI (1982) The inferior segment technique for breast reduction. Ann Plast Surg 8: 493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Hester TR Jr, Bostwick J, Miller L, Cunningham SJ (1985) Breast reduction utilizing the maximally vascularized central breast pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 76: 890

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Dartigues L (1925) Traitement chirurgical du prolapsus mammaire. Arch Franco Belg Chir 28: 313

    Google Scholar 

  73. Cruz-Korchin N, Korchin L (2003) Vertical versus Wise pattern breast reduction: Patient satisfaction, revision rates, and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 112: 1573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Lassus C (1969) Possibilites et limites de la chirurgie plastique de la silhouette feminine. Hopital 801: 575

    Google Scholar 

  75. Lassus CA (1970) Technique for breast reduction. Int Surg 53: 69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Lassus C (1981) New refinements in vertical mammoplasty. Chir Plast 6: 81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Lassus C (1987) Breast reduction: evolution of a technique-A single vertical scar. Aesthetic Plast Surg 11: 107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Lassus C (1996) A 30-year experience with vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 97: 373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Lassus C (1999) Update on vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 104: 2289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Lejour M (1998) Pedicle modification of the Lejour vertical scar reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 101: 1149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Lejour M (1999) Vertical mammaplasty: early complications after 250 personal consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 104: 764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Lejour M (1999) Vertical mammaplasty: update and appraisal of late results. Plast Reconstr Surg 104: 771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Hall-Findlay E (2002) Vertical breast reduction with a medially-based pedicle. Aesthetic Surg J 22: 185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Hamdi M, Hammond DC, Nahai F (eds) (2005) Vertical Scar Mammaplasty. Springer

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Es besteht kein Interessenkonflikt. Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen. Die Präsentation des Themas ist unabhängig und die Darstellung der Inhalte produktneutral.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Ryssel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryssel, H., Germann, G. & Heitmann, C. Plastisch-chirurgische Korrekturen der Körperform – Rekonstruktion und Ästhetik. Chirurg 78, 381–396 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-007-1323-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-007-1323-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation