Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Navigation an der Brust- und Lendenwirbelsäule mit dem 3D-Bildwandler

Intraoperative three-dimensional navigation for pedicle screw placement

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Das SIREMOBIL Iso-C3D (Siemens AG, Medical Solutions, Erlangen) erlaubt die intraoperative dreidimensionale Erfassung knöcherner Strukturen. Es wird ein hochauflösender 3D-Datenkubus mit einer Kantenlänge von 12 cm erzeugt. Die Daten können in ein Navigationssystem importiert werden, ohne die Notwendigkeit einer Registrierung des Datensatzes durch den Chirurgen. In der vorliegenden prospektiven Studie wird die Genauigkeit der Iso-C3D-Navigation bei der Platzierung von thorakalen und lumbalen Pedikelschrauben untersucht. Bei 61 Patienten mit 73 Frakturen wurden insgesamt 302 Pedikelschrauben platziert. Bei 5 Schrauben wurde in einem postoperativen Kontroll-CT eine inkorrekte Schraubenlage (≥2 mm) nachgewiesen. Dies entspricht einer Fehlplatzierungsrate von 1,7%. Durchleuchtungszeit bei der Iso-C3D-Navigation lag bei 1,28 (±0,56) min bei einer Gesamtoperationsdauer von 103,26 (±23,3) min. Neurologische Komplikationen wurden postoperativ nicht beobachtet. Die Iso-C3D-Navigation stellt ein sehr präzises Verfahren zur Platzierung von Pedikelschrauben dar.

Abstract

The mobile SIREMOBIL Iso-C3D C-arm (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) is the first device permitting intraoperative, three-dimensional representation of bone structures. A high-resolution, isotropic 3D data cube in the isocenter with sides of approximately 12 cm is calculated simultaneously. The SIREMOBIL Iso-C3D is linked to the navigation system. This makes it possible to transfer the generated 3D data directly to the linked navigation system without the need for surgeon-dependent registration. In this prospective clinical trial, we evaluated the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using this device. In 61 patients, a total of 302 pedicle screws were placed. Only in five cases (1.7%) were misplacements of ≥2 mm shown in postoperative control CT. The average fluoroscopy time was 1.28±0.56 min, and the average operative duration was 103.26±23.3 min. There were no postoperative neurological complications in any of the 30 patients. From these data, we conclude that Iso-C3D navigation is a very accurate method for the placement of pedicle screws.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Amiot LP, Labelle H, De Guise JA, Bellefleur C, Rivard CH (1996) Computer assisted pedicle screw installation. Our first 3 cases. Ann Chir 50:626–630

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H (2000) Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, sacral spine. Spine 25:606–614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arand M, Hartwig E, Hebold D, Kinzl L, Gebhard F (2001) Präzisionsanalyse navigationsgestützt implantierter thorakaler und lumbaler Pedikelschrauben. Unfallchirurg 104:1076–1081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Austin MS, Vaccaro AR, Brislin B, Nachwalter R, Hilibrand AS, Albert TJ (2002) Image-guided spine surgery: a cadaver study comparing conventional open laminoforaminotomy and two image-guided techniques for pedicle screw placement in posterolateral fusion and nonfusion models. Spine 27:2503–2508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berlemann U, Heini P, Muller U, Stoupis C, Schwarzenbach O (1997) Reliability of pedicle screw assessment utilizing plain radiographs versus CT reconstruction. Eur Spine J 6:406–410

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berlemann U, Monin D, Arm E, Nolte LP, Ozdoba C (1997) Planning and insertion of pedicle screws with computer assistance. J Spinal Disord 10:117–124

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cinotti G, Gumina S, Ripani M, Postacchini F (1999) Pedicle instrumentation in the thoracic spine. A morphometric and cadaveric study for placement of screws. Spine 24:114–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Duda D, Brandt L, Rudlof B, Mertzlufft F, Dick W (1988) Effekt verschiedener Präoxygenierungsprotokolle auf den arteriellen Sauerstoffstatus. Anaesthesist 37:408–412

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebraheim NA, Jabaly G, Xu R, Yeasting RA (1997) Anatomic relations of the thoracic pedicle to the adjacent neural structures. Spine 22:1553–1556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Foley KT, Smith MM (1996) Image-guided spine surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 7:171–186

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gebhard F, Kinzl L, Arand M (2000) Grenzen der CT-basierten Computernavigation in der Wirbelsäulenchirurgie. Unfallchirurg 103:696–701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gebhard F, Kraus M, Schneider E et al. (2003) Strahlendosis im OP—ein Vergleich computerassistierter Verfahren. Unfallchirurg 106:492–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gertzbein S, Robbins S (1990) Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine 15:11–14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Glossop N, Hu R (1997) Assessment of vertebral body motion during spine surgery. Spine 22:903–909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grützner PA, Köhler T, Vock B, Wentzensen A (2001) Rechnergestütztes Operieren an der Wirbelsäule. OP J 17:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grützner PA, Vock B, Wentzensen A (2001) C-Arm Navigation an der LWS. Osteologie 10 [Suppl 2]

  17. Hofstetter R, Slomczykowski M, Sati M, Nolte LP (1999) Fluoroscopy as an imaging means for computer-assisted surgical navigation. Comput Aided Surg 4:65–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kothe R, Matthias SJ, Deuretzbacher G, Hemmi T, Lorenzen M, Wiesner L (2001) Computer navigation of parapedicular screw fixation in the thoracic spine: a cadaver study. Spine 26:E496–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kothe R, Panjabi MM, Liu W (1997) Multidirectional instability of the thoracic spine due to iatrogenic pedicle injuries during transpedicular fixation. A biomechanical investigation. Spine 22:1836–1842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D (2000) Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 9:235–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Laine T, Schlenzka D, Makitalo K, Tallroth K, Nolte LP, Visarius H (1997) Improved accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer-assisted surgery. A prospective clinical trial of 30 patients. Spine 22:1254–1258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liljenqvist U, Hackenberg L, Link T, Halm H (2001) Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. Acta Orthop Belg 67:157–163

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Merkelbach D, Brandt L, Mertzlufft F (1993) Verhalten der arteriellen und gemischt-venösen Sauerstoff- und Kohlendioxidpartialdrücke sowie der pH-Werte während und nach einer Intubationsapnoe. Untersuchungen zum in vivo Auftreten des Christiansen-Douglas-Haldane-Effekts. Anaesthesist 42:691–701

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mertzlufft F, Brandt L (1989) Hyperoxic intubation apnoea: an in vivo model for the proof of the Christiansen-Douglas-Haldane effect. Adv Exp Med Biol 248:397–405

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mertzlufft F, Krier C (2001) Präoxygenierung—ein Muß. Aber wie? Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 36:451–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nolte LP, Zamorano L, Visarius H et al. (1995) Clinical evaluation of a system for precision enhancement in spine surgery. Clin Biomech (Bristol., Avon.) 10:293–303

    Google Scholar 

  27. Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel V et al. (1991) Thoracic human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 16:888–901

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rampersaud YR, Foley KT, Shen AC, Williams S, Solomito M (2000) Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion. Spine 25:2637–2645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rampersaud YR, Simon DA, Foley KT (2001) Accuracy requirements for image-guided spinal pedicle screw placement. Spine 26:352–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ritter D, Mitschke M, Graumann R (2002) Markerless Navigation with the intraoperative Imaging Modality SIREMOBIL Iso C3D. Electromedica 70 (1):31–36

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sapkas GS, Papadakis SA, Stathakopoulos DP, Papagelopoulos PJ, Badekas AC, Kaiser JH (1999) Evaluation of pedicle screw position in thoracic and lumbar spine fixation using plain radiographs and computed tomography. A prospective study of 35 patients. Spine 24:1926–1929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schlenzka D, Laine T, Lund T (2000) Computer-assisted spine surgery. Eur Spine J 9 [Suppl 1]:57–64

  33. Schulze CJ, Munzinger E, Weber U (1998) Clinical relevance of accuracy of pedicle screw placement. A computed tomographic-supported analysis. Spine 23:2215–2220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Jost B et al. (1997) Accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw placement. An in vivo computed tomography analysis. Spine 22:452–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ugur HC, Attar A, Uz A, Tekdemir I, Egemen N, Genc Y (2001) Thoracic pedicle: surgical anatomic evaluation and relations. J Spinal Disord 14:39–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Weinstein J, Spratt K, Sprengel D, Brick C, Reid S (1988) Spinal pedicle fixation: Reliability and validity of roentgenogram, based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. Spine 13:1012–1018

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A et al. (1987) Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine 12:160–166

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Ludwigshafen, Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie an der Universität Heidelberg

    P. A. Grützner, K. Wendl, J. von Recum & A. Wentzensen

  2. M.E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, Universität Bern, Schweiz

    T. Beutler & L.-P. Nolte

  3. Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Ludwigshafen, Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie an der Universität Heidelberg, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071 , Ludwigshafen

    P. A. Grützner

Authors
  1. P. A. Grützner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Beutler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Wendl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. von Recum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Wentzensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. L.-P. Nolte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grützner, P.A., Beutler, T., Wendl, K. et al. Navigation an der Brust- und Lendenwirbelsäule mit dem 3D-Bildwandler. Chirurg 75, 967–975 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-004-0944-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-004-0944-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation