Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
  3. Article
Richtwerte für Methylmethacrylat in der Innenraumluft
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Bekanntmachungen – Amtliche Mitteilungen
  • Published: 29 December 2020

Richtwerte für Methylmethacrylat in der Innenraumluft

Mitteilung des Ausschusses für Innenraumrichtwerte (AIR)

    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz volume 64, pages 126–135 (2021)Cite this article

    • 362 Accesses

    • Metrics details

    Download to read the full article text

    Working on a manuscript?

    Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

    Learn more

    Literatur

    1. ECHA (2015) Methyl Methacrylate. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Annankatu 18, P.O. Box 400, FI-00121 Helsinki, Finland. Dossier Stand 16.01.2020. https://echa.europa.eu/de/registration-dossier/-/registered-dossier/15528. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    2. DFG (1984) Methylmethacrylat. Gesundheitsschädliche Arbeitsstoffe. Toxikologisch-arbeitsmedizinische Begründungen von MAK-Werten, 10. Aufl. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, S 1–30

      Google Scholar 

    3. ECB (2002) European Union Risk Assessment Report. Methyl methacrylate, CAS No: 80-62-6, EINECS No: 201-297-1. Vol. 22. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/7c9a0eb6-9b7f-4fd6-846b-d480e8e0003d (Hansen, B. G., Munn, S. J., Pakalin, S. et al. (Ed.). Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, European Chemicals Bureau. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg). Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    4. BfR (2011) Flüssige Mittel zur Nagelmodellage mit hohem Methylmethacrylat-Gehalten sind gesundheitlich bedenklich. Vol. Stellungnahme Nr. 014/2012 des BfR vom 22.12.2011. Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Berlin. https://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/343/fluessige-mittel-zur-nagelmodellage-mit-hohen-methylmethacrylat-gehalten-sind-gesundheitlich-bedenklich.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    5. ECHA (2018) Substance evaluation conclusion as required by REACH article 48 and evaluation report for methyl methacrylate. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/c819add5-3d93-4482-3b70-72cb30debea7. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    6. Eis D, Helm D, Laußmann D et al (2005) Berliner Studie zu umweltbezogenen Erkrankungen. Im Auftrag des Bundesgesundheitsministeriums, Berlin. https://www.apug.de/archiv/pdf/Berichtsband_Berliner-Studie.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    7. Hofmann H, Erdmann G, Müller A (2014) Zielkonflikt energieeffiziente Bauweise und gute Raumluftqualität – Datenerhebung für flüchtige organische Verbindungen in der Innenraumluft von Wohn- und Bürogebäuden (Lösungswege). Anhang zum Abschlussbericht. https://www.agoef.de/fileadmin/user_upload/dokumente/forschung/AGOEF-Abschlussericht_VOCDB_II_Anhang-nicht-barrierefrei.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    8. Zhu J, Newhook R, Marro L et al (2005) Selected volatile organic compounds in residential air in the city of. Technol, Bd. 39. Environ. Sci, Ottawa, Canada, S 3964–3971

      Google Scholar 

    9. Walt M, Matter K, Hackenschmidt S (2015) Methylmethacrylat (MMA)-Kontamination von Kita und Wohnungen, Fallbericht. Zentrum für Arbeits- und Umweltmedizin e. V. (ZAUM Berlin). https://zaumberlin.de/wordpress_zaum/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/MMA_kont_wohn-kita_stick28-Bl-neu.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    10. (2020) LGL. (2013) Pilotprojekt zu Lösemitteln in der Luft von Nagelstudios. Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LGL). https://www.lgl.bayern.de/arbeitsschutz/stofflicher_arbeitsschutz/projekte_a_z/nagelstudios_loesemittel.htm. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    11. Quach T, Von Behren J, Nelson DO et al (2018) Evaluating an owner-to-worker training intervention in California nail salons using personal air monitoring. Am J Ind Med 61:831–841

      Article  Google Scholar 

    12. Steinle P (2016) Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer and indoor air measurements in office settings. J Occup Environ Hyg 13:121–132

      Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    13. Hofmann H, Plieninger P (2008) Bereitstellung einer Datenbank zum Vorkommen von flüchtigen organischen Verbindungen in der Raumluft. Vol. Forschungsbericht 205 61 243. Arbeitsgemeinschaft ökologischer Forschungsinstitute (AGÖF) e. V., im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamts. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/publikation/long/3637.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    14. Chen L-Y, Jeng F-T, Chang M-W et al (2000) Rationalization of an odor monitoring system? A case study of Lin-Yuan Petrochemical Park. Environ Sci Technol 34:1166–1173

      Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    15. Jia C, Battermann S, Godwin C (2008) VOCs in industrial, urban and suburban neighborhoods, Part 1: Indoor and outdoor concentrations, variation, and risk drivers. Atmospheric Environ 42:2083–2100

      Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    16. U.S.EPA (2008) Methyl Methacrylate (CAS Reg. No. 80-62-6). Interim Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs). United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT). https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-08/documents/methyl_methacrylate_interim_oct_2008_v1.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    17. Raje RR, Ahmad S, Weisbroth SH (1985) Methylmethacrylate: tissue distribution and pulmonary damage in rats following acute inhalation. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 50:151–154

      CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    18. DFG (2006) Methylmethacrylat. In: Greim H (Hrsg) Gesundheitsschädliche Arbeitsstoffe. Toxikologisch-arbeitsmedizinische Begründungen von MAK-Werten, 41. Aufl. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, S 1–26

      Google Scholar 

    19. U.S.EPA (1998) Toxicological Review of Methyl Methacrylate (CAS No. 80-62-6). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/iris_documents/documents/toxreviews/1000tr.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    20. Svartling N, Pfäffli P, al Tarkkanen Let (1986) Blood levels and half-life of methylmethacrylate after tourniquet release during knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 105:36–39

      Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    21. Gentil B, Paugam C, Wolf C, Lienhart A, Augereau B (1993) Methylmethacrylate plasma levels during total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 287:112–116

      Google Scholar 

    22. Mainwaring G, Foster JR, Lund V et al (2001) Methyl methacrylate toxicity in rat nasal epithelium: studies of the mechanism of action and comparisons between species. Toxicology 158:109–118

      Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    23. Frederick CB, Lomax LG, Black KA et al (2002) Use of a hybrid computational fluid dynamics and physiologically based inhalation model for interspecies dosimetry comparisons of ester vapors. Toxicol Appl. Pharmacol, Bd. 183, S 23–40

      Google Scholar 

    24. Muttray A, Gosepath J, Brieger H et al (2007) Zur Wirkung von 50 ppm Methylmethacrylat auf die oberen Atemwege gesunder Probanden. Dokumentation der 47. Jahrestagung der DGAUM in Mainz. Letzel, S. (Hrsg.). https://www.asu-arbeitsmedizin.com/sites/default/files/2019-08/asu-2007-03-anz_mjazmja2.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    25. Muttray A, Gosepath J, Brieger J et al (2015) No acute effects of an exposure to 50 ppm methyl methacrylate on the upper airways. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 88:1043–1051

      Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    26. Blaszkewicz M, Hey K, Kiesswetter E et al (2010) Abgrenzung und Differenzierung ‚irritativer‘ und ‚belästigender‘ Effekte von Gefahrstoffen – Fortsetzung (FP267). https://www.dguv.de/medien/ifa/de/pro/pro1/ff-fp0267/ff_fp0267_abschlussbericht.pdf (Abschlussbericht zum Verbundprojekt. Leibniz-Institut für Arbeitsforschung an der Technischen Universität Dortmund. Addendum Zwischenberichte 2008–2010). Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    27. Borak J, Fields C, Andrews LS et al (2011) Methyl methacrylate and respiratory sensitization: a critical review. Crit Rev Toxicol 41:230–268

      Article  Google Scholar 

    28. DFG (1997) Methylmethacrylat. In: Greim H (Hrsg) Gesundheitsschädliche Arbeitsstoffe. Toxikologisch-arbeitsmedizinische Begründungen von MAK-Werten, 24. Aufl. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, S 1–11

      Google Scholar 

    29. Röhm (1994) Medical examination of workers in acrylic shett production exposed to methyl methacrylate Bd. 2006. Röhm GmbH, Darmstadt (Zitiert nach DFG)

      Google Scholar 

    30. Hext PM, Pinto PJ, Gaskell BA (2001) Methyl methacrylate toxicity in rat nasal epithelium: investigation of the time course of lesion development and recovery from short term vapour inhalation. Toxicology 156:119–128

      Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    31. NTP (1986) Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of methyl methacrylate (CAS: 80-62-6) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Inhalation Studies). Vol. 259. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, National Institutes of Health. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/lt_rpts/tr314.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    32. Tansy MF, Hohenleitner FJ, White DK et al (1980) Chronic biological effects of methyl methacrylate vapor. III. Histopathology, blood chemistries, and hepatic and ciliary function in the rat. Environ Res 21:117–125

      Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    33. Drees JA, Tansy MF, Smith JM (1979) Cardiovascular responses to chronic methyl methacrylate inhalation in Beagle dogs. Fed Am Soc Exp Biol 38:1135

      Google Scholar 

    34. Tansy MF, Kendall FM, Benhayem S et al (1976) Chronic biological effects of methyl methacrylate vapor. I. Body and tissue weights, blood chemistries, and intestinal transit in the rat. Environ Res 11:66–77

      Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    35. Hazleton (Rohm and Haas) (1979) A two-year vapor inhalation safety evaluation study in rats: methyl methacrylate vapor, final report. Hazleton Laboratories America, Vienna, VA, S 417–354

      Google Scholar 

    36. Lomax LG, Krivanek ND, Frame SR (1997) Chronic inhalation toxicity and oncogenicity of methyl methacrylate in rats and hamsters. Food Chem Toxicol 35:393–407

      Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    37. Lomax LG (1992) Histopathologic evaluation of the nasal cavities from Fisher 344 rats exposed to methyl methacrylate vapor for two years. Rohm und Haas Company, Spring House, PA (Cited in US EPA (1998))

      Google Scholar 

    38. Hazleton (Rohm and Haas) (1979) 18-month vapor inhalation safety evaluation study in hamsters: methyl methacrylate vapor, final report. Hazleton Laboratories America, Vienna, VA, S 417–354

      Google Scholar 

    39. Hardisty JF, Garman RH, Harkema JR et al (1999) Histopathology of nasal olfactory mucosa from selected inhalation toxicity studies conducted with volatile chemicals. Toxicol Pathol 27:618–627

      Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    40. Borzelleca JF, Larson PS, Hennigar GR et al (1964) Studies on the chronic oral toxicity of monomeric ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 6:29–36

      Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    41. ECHA (2020) Classification and Labelling Inventory: Harmonised Classification—Annex VI of Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation). European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Annankatu 18, P.O. Box 400, FI-00121 Helsinki, Finnland. https://echa.europa.eu/de/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-database/-/discli/details/104369. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    42. IARC (1994) Some Industrial Chemicals. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans 60. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer), WHO (World Health Organization), Lyon, France. http://publications.iarc.fr/_publications/media/download/2017/91e1d37ff33b7285b94ec62e51e19cdd5107a549.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    43. Rohm and Haas (1977). Subchronic vapor inhalation study with methyl methacrylate (C50680) in F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. Vol. Report to Tracor Jitco, Inc., submitted by IBT Laboratories. Cited in WHO (1998).

    44. WHO (1998) Methyl Methacrylate. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 4. WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.inchem.org/documents/cicads/cicads/cicad04.htm. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    45. U.S.EPA (1998) Chemical Assessment Summary: Methyl methacrylate; CASRN 80-62-6. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/iris_documents/documents/subst/1000_summary.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    46. DECOS (Dutch Expert Committee on Occupational Safety) (2011) Methyl methacrylate—Health-based recommended occupational exposure limit. https://www.healthcouncil.nl/documents/advisory-reports/2011/12/16/methyl-methacrylate-health-based-recommended-occupational-exposure-limit. Zugegriffen: 1. Aug. 2020

    Download references

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Richtwerte für Methylmethacrylat in der Innenraumluft. Bundesgesundheitsbl 64, 126–135 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-020-03251-3

    Download citation

    • Published: 29 December 2020

    • Issue Date: January 2021

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-020-03251-3

    Share this article

    Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

    Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

    Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

    Download PDF

    Working on a manuscript?

    Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

    Learn more

    Advertisement

    Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

    Switch Edition
    • Academic Edition
    • Corporate Edition
    • Home
    • Impressum
    • Legal information
    • Privacy statement
    • California Privacy Statement
    • How we use cookies
    • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
    • Accessibility
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Affiliate program

    Not logged in - 3.239.6.58

    Not affiliated

    Springer Nature

    © 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.