Advertisement

Empfehlung zum Schutz von Badenden vor Cyanobakterien-Toxinen

Bekanntmachungen – Amtliche Mitteilungen

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Umweltbundesamt (2003) Empfehlung zum Schutz von Badenden vor Cyanobakterien-Toxinen. Bundesgesundheitsbl 46:530–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chorus I (2012) Current approaches to cyanotoxin risk assessment, risk management and regulation in different countries. Umweltbundesamt, DessauGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Badewasserrichtlinie (EG-BadewRL) Richtlinie 2006/7/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 15 Februar 2006 über die Qualität von Badegewässern und deren Bewirtschaftung und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 76/160EWGGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Chorus I, Bartram J (1999) Toxic cyanobacteria in water: a guide to public health significance, monitoring and management. Für WHO durch E & FN Spon/Chapman & Hall, London. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/resources/toxicyanbact/en/. Zugegriffen: 06. Mai 2015
  6. 6.
    Funari E, Testai E (2008) Human health risk assessment related to cyanotoxins exposure. Crit Rev Toxicol 38(2):97–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    IARC (2010) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Volume 94. Ingested nitrate and nitrite, and cyanobacterial peptide toxins. World Health Organization (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), LyonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jochimsen EM, Carmichael WW, An JS et al (1998) Liver failure and death following exposure to microcystin toxins at a dialysis center in Brazil. N Eng J Med 338:873–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ibelings BW, Chorus I (2007) Accumulation of cyanobacterial toxins in freshwater „seafood“ and its consequences for public health: a review. Environ Pollut 150(1):177–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chorus I, Niesel V (2011) Phytoplankton species response to oligotrophication. In: Chorus I, Schauser I (Hrsg) Oligotrophication of lake tegel and schlachtensee, Berlin. Analysis of system components, causalities and response thresholds compared to responses of other waterbodies. Umweltbundesamt, Dessau, S 22–58Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carvalho L, McDonald C, de Hoyos C et al (2013) Sustaining recreational quality of European lakes: minimizing the health risks from algal blooms through phosphorus control. J Appl Ecol 50:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fastner J, Neumann U, Wirsing B, Weckesser J, Wiedner C, Nixdorf B, Chorus I (1999) Microcystins (hepatotoxic heptapeptides) in German fresh waters. Environ Toxicol 14:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bumke-Vogt C, Mailahn W, Chorus I (1999) Anatoxin-a and neurotoxic cyanobacteria in German lakes and reservoirs. Environ Toxicol 14:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Catherine Q, Susanna W, Isidora ES, Mark H, Aurélie V, Jean-François H (2013) A review of current knowledge on toxic benthic freshwater cyanobacteria – ecology, toxin production and risk management. Water Res 47(15):5464–5479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stewart I, Seawright AA, Schluter PJ, Shaw GR (2006) Primary irritant and delayed-contact hypersensitivity reactions to the freshwater cyanobacterium Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii and its associated toxin cylindrospermopsin. BMC Dermatol 6:5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Török A, Pálovics Á, Bánki M (2001) Allergenic (sensitization, skin and eye irritation) effects of freshwater cyanobacteria-Experimental evidence. Environ Toxicol 16:512–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stewart I, Robertson IM, Webb PM, Schluter PJ, Shaw GR (2006) Cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions to freshwater cyanobacteria – human volunteer studies. BMC Dermatol 6:6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuiper-Goodman T, Falconer I, Fitzgerald J (1999) Human health aspects. In: Chorus I, Bartram J (Hrsg) Toxic cyanobacteria in water: a guide to public health significance, monitoring and management. Chapman & Hall, London, S 125–160Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pilotto LS, Douglas RM, Burch MD, Cameron S, Beers M, Rouch GR et al (1997) Health effects of exposure to cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) due to recreational water-related activities. Aust N Z J Public Health 21:562–566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stewart I, Webb PM, Schluter PJ, Fleming LE, Burns JW Jr, Gantar M, Backer LC, Shaw GR (2006) Epidemiology of recreational exposure to freshwater cyanobacteria – an international prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 6:93CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Backer LC, McNeel SV, Barber T et al (2010) Recreational exposure to microcystins during algal blooms in two California lakes. Toxicon 55(5):909–921CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lévesque B, Gervais M-C, Chevalier P et al (2014) Prospective study of acute health effects in relation to exposure to cyanobacteria. Sci Tot Env 466–467:397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rapala J, Kilponen J, Järvinen M, Lahti K (2012) Finland: guidellines for monitoringo f cyanobacteria and their toxins. In: Chorus I (Hrsg) Current approaches to Cyanotoxin risk assessment, risk management and regulations in different countries. Umweltbundesamt, Dessau, S 54–62Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gugger M, Lenoir S, Berger C, Ledreux A, Druart J-C, Humbert J-F, Guette C, Bernard C (2005) First report in a river in France of the benthic cyanobacterium Phormidium favosum producing anatoxin-a associated with dog neurotoxicosis. Toxicon 45(7):919–928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Handeland K, Østensvik Ø (2010) Microcystin poisoning in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Toxicon 56(6):1076–1078CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Backer LC, Landsberg JH, Miller M, Keel K, Taylor TK (2013) Canine cyanotoxin poisonings in the United States (1920s-2012): review of suspected and confirmed cases from three data sources. Toxins 5(9):1597–1628CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ian Falconer I, Bartram J, Chorus I, Kuiper- Goodman T, Utkilen H, Burch M, Codd GA (1999) Safe levels and safe practices. In: Chorus I, Bartram J (Hrsg) Toxic cyanobacteria in water: a guide to their public health consequences, monitoring and management. Chapman & Hall, London, S 161 ffGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    WHO (2003) Algae and cyanobacteria in fresh water. In: Guidelines for safe recreational water environments. Vol. 1: coastal and fresh waters. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Giannuzzi L, Sedan D, Echenique R, Andrinolo D (2011) An acute case of intoxication with cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins in recreational water in Salto Grande Dam, Argentina. Marine Drugs 9(11):2164–2175CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    LAWA (2015) Trophieklassifikation von Seen; Richtlinie zur Ermittlung des Trophie-Index nach LAWA für natürliche Seen, Baggerseen, Talsperren und Speicherseen. Kulturbuch-Verlag, Berlin (im Druck)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roller M (2000) Risikoabschätzung für die Exposition gegenüber Blaualgen (Cyanobakterien) und ihren Toxinen in Badegewässern. Gutachten erstellt für das Niedersächsische Ministerium für Frauen, Arbeit und Soziales, HannoverGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Humpage AR, Falconer IR (2003) Oral toxicity of the cyanobacterial toxin cylindrospermopsin in male swiss albino mice: determination of no observed adverse effect level for deriving a drinking water guideline value. Environ Toxicol 18:94–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    WHO (1998) Guidelines for drinking water quality. 2nd edition. Addendum to Vol 2 Health Criteria and other supporting information. WHO, GenfGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fromme H, Köhler A, Krause R, Führling D (2000) Occurence of cyanobacterial toxins – microcystins and anatoxin-a – in Berlin water bodies with implications to human health and regulations. Environ Toxicol 15:120–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mischke U, Riedmüller U, Hoehn E, Nixdorf B (2008) Praxistest zur Bewertung von Seen anhand des Phytoplanktons gemäß EU-WRRL. Endbericht zum LAWA-Projekt (O 5.05). In: Mischke U, Nixdorf B (Hrsg) Gewässerreport (Nr. 10): Bewertung von Seen mittels Phytoplankton zur Umsetzung der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie, Eigenverlag der BTU Cottbus (BTUC-AR 2/2008, ISBN 978-3-940471-06-2). Cottbus, S 7–115Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wasserrahmenrichtlinie (EG-WRRL) Richtlinie 2000/60/EG des Europäischen Parlamentes und des Rates vom 23. Oktober 2000 zur Schaffung eines Ordnungsrahmens für Maßnahmen der Gemeinschaft im Bereich der Wasserpolitik. ABl. EG Nr. L 327/1, 22.12.2000Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Oberflächengewässerverordnung (OGewV) Verordnung zum Schutz der Oberflächengewässer. Bundesgesetzblatt Jahrgang 2011 Teil I Nr. 37, ausgegeben zu Bonn am 25. Juli 2011Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wasserblick (2014) Wasserblick: Bund-Länder-Informations- und Kommunikationsplattform. http://www.wasserblick.net/servlet/is/42489. Zugegriffen: 16. März 2015
  39. 39.
    DIN EN ISO 6878:2004–09 (2004) Wasserbeschaffenheit – Bestimmung von Phosphor – Photometrisches Verfahren mittels Ammoniummolybdat (ISO 6878:2004)4Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    ISO 10260 (1992) Water quality – measurement of biochemical parameters – Spectrometric determination of the chlorophyll-a concentration.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Catherine A, Escoffier N, Belhocine A, Nasri AB, Hamlaoui S, Yéprémian C, Bernard C, Troussellier M (2012) On the use of the FluoroProbe ®, a phytoplankton quantification method based on fluorescence excitation spectra for large-scale surveys of lakes and reservoirs. Wat Res 46(6):1771–1784Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    DIN EN 15204:2006–12 (2006) Wasserbeschaffenheit – Anleitung für die Zählung von Phytoplankton mittels der Umkehrmikroskopie (Utermöhl-Technik)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Triantis T, Tsimeli K, Kaloudis T, Thanassoulias N, Lytras E, Hiskia A (2010) Development of an integrated laboratory system for the monitoring of cyanotoxins in surface and drinking waters. Toxicon 55(5):979–989CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Humpage AR, Froscio SM, Lau H-M, Murphy D, Blackbeard J (2012) Evaluation of the abraxis strip test for microcystins™ for use with wastewater effluent and reservoir water. Wat Res 46(5):1556–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    ISO 20179 (2005) Water quality – determination of microcystins – method using solid phase extraction (SPE) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet (UV) detection.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Spoof L, Vesterkvist P, Lindholm T, Meriluoto J (2003) Screening for cyanobacterial hepatotoxins, microcystins and nodularin in environmental water samples by reversed-phase liquid chromatography- electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry. J Chromat A 1020(1):105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Oehrle SA, Southwell B, Westrick J (2010) Detection of various freshwater cyanobacterial toxins using ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Toxicon 55(5):965–972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Furey A, Crowley J, Hamilton B, Lehane M, James KJ (2005) Strategies to avoid the mis-identification of anatoxin-a using mass spectrometry in the forensic investigation of acute neurotoxic poisoning. J Chromat A 1082:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lawrence JF, Niedzwiadek B, Menard C.(2005) Quantitative determination of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins in shellfish using prechromatographic oxidation and liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 88(6):1714–1732PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Umweltbundesamt (2011) Entscheidungsunterstützungssytem für die Entwicklung einer systemspezifischen Strategie gegen das Vorkommen von Cyanotoxinen im Trinkwasser vom Einzugsgebiet bis zum Verbraucher. www.toxische-cyanobakterien.de. Zugegriffen: 17. März 2015

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Personalised recommendations