Prävention und Kontrolle Katheter-assoziierter Harnwegsinfektionen

Empfehlung der Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention (KRINKO) beim Robert Koch-Institut

Literatur

  1. 1

    Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention (KRINKO) (2010) Die Kategorien in der Richtlinie für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention – Aktualisierung der Definitionen. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 53(7):754–756

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention (KRINKO) (1999) Empfehlungen zur Prävention und Kontrolle Katheter-assoziierter Harnwegsinfektionen. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 42:806–809

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention (KRINKO) (2011) Anforderungen an die Hygiene bei Punktionen und Injektionen. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 54(9):1135–1144

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention (KRINKO) (2000) Händehygiene. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 43:230–233

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Robert Koch-Institut (2007) Anforderungen der Krankenhaushygiene und des Arbeitsschutzes an die Hygienebekleidung und persönliche Schutzausrüstung. Epid Bull 1:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention (KRINKO) (2001) Mitteilung der Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention zur Surveillance (Erfassung und Bewertung) von nosokomialen Infektionen (Umsetzung von § 23 IfSG). Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 44(5):523–536

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Conway LJ, Larson EL (2012) Guidelines to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: 1980–2010. Heart Lung 41(3):271–283

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Hooton TM et al (2010) Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis 50(5):625–663

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Gould CV et al (2010) Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 31(4):319–326

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Lo E et al (2008) Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 29 (Suppl 1):41–50

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Chenoweth CE, Gould CV, Saint S (2014) Diagnosis, management, and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 28(1):105–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Loveday HP et al (2014) epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England. J Hosp Infect 86 (Suppl 1):1–70

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Lo E et al (2014) Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 35(5):464–479

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Behnke M et al (2013) Nosocomial infection and antibiotic use—a second national prevalence study in Germany. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 110(38):627–633

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Gastmeier P, Geffers C (2008) Nosokomiale Infektionen in Deutschland: Wie viele gibt es wirklich? Eine Schätzung für das Jahr 2006. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 133(21):1111–1115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Saint S, Chenoweth CE (2003) Biofilms and catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 17(2):411–432

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Lewalter K et al (2013) Die katheterassoziierte Harnwegsinfektion – was gibt es Neues? Krankenhaushygiene up2date 8:25–36

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Weinstein JW et al (1999) A decade of prevalence surveys in a tertiary-care center: trends in nosocomial infection rates, device utilization, and patient acuity. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20(8):543–548

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Wagenlehner FM et al (2006) Incidence of nosocomial urinary tract infections on a surgical intensive care unit and implications for management. Int J Antimicrob Agents 28 (Suppl 1):86–90

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Bagshaw SM, Laupland KB (2006) Epidemiology of intensive care unit-acquired urinary tract infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 19(1):67–71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Nationales Referenzzentrum für Surveillance von nosokomialen Infektionen (2014) Infektionssurveillance im Modul ITS-KISS, Referenzdaten Berechnungszeitraum: Januar 2009 bis Dezember 2013; KISS Krankenhaus-Infektions-Surveillance-System. http://www.nrz-hygiene.de/fileadmin/nrz/module/its/200901_201312_ALLE_ITSRef.pdf

  22. 22

    Nationales Referenzzentrum für Surveillance von nosokomialen Infektionen (2014) Infektionssurveillance im Modul STATIONS-KISS; Referenzdaten Berechnungszeitraum: Januar 2009 bis Dezember 2013. http://www.nrz-hygiene.de/surveillance/kiss/stations-kiss/infektionen/

  23. 23

    Chenoweth C, Saint S (2013) Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin 29(1):19–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Tenke P et al (2008) European and Asian guidelines on management and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 31 (Suppl 1):68–78

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Holroyd-Leduc JM et al (2007) The relationship of indwelling urinary catheters to death, length of hospital stay, functional decline, and nursing home admission in hospitalized older medical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 55(2):227–233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Chant C et al (2011) Relationship of catheter-associated urinary tract infection to mortality and length of stay in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Care Med 39(5):1167–1173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Trautner BW (2010) Management of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis 23(1):76–82

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Nationales Referenzzentrum (NRZ) für Surveillance von nosokomialen Infektionen am Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin (2011) Definition nosokomialer Infektionen (CDC-Definitionen). Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Nationales Referenzzentrum für Surveillance von nosokomialen Infektionen (2014) Infektionssurveillance im Modul STATIONS-KISS Referenzdaten, Berechnungszeitraum: Januar 2009 bis Dezember 2013. http://www.nrz-hygiene.de/surveillance/kiss/stations-kiss/infektionen

  30. 30

    Shuman EK, Chenoweth CE (2010) Recognition and prevention of healthcare-associated urinary tract infections in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 38 (Suppl 8):373–379

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Rebmann T, Greene LR (2010) Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: an executive summary of the association for professionals in infection control and epidemiology, inc, elimination guide. Am J Infect Control 38(8):644–646

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Nicolle LE (2012) Urinary catheter-associated infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 26:13–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Meddings J et al (2014) Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an integrative review. BMJ Qual Saf 23:277–289

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    van der Kooi TI et al (2007) Incidence and risk factors of device-associated infections and associated mortality at the intensive care in the Dutch surveillance system. Intensive Care Med 33:271–278

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Leone M et al (2003) Risk factors of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in a polyvalent intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 29:1077–1080

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Tissot E et al (2001) Risk factors for catheter-associated bacteriuria in a medical intensive care unit. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 20:260–262

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Hazelett SE et al (2006) The association between indwelling urinary catheter use in the elderly and urinary tract infection in acute care. BMC Geriatrics 6:15

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Saint S et al (2006) Risk factors for nosocomial urinary tract-related bacteremia: a case-control study. Am J Infect Control 34:401–407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Burke JP, Larsen RA, Stevens LE (1986) Nosocomial bacteriuria: estimating the potential for prevention by closed sterile urinary drainage. Infect Control 7:96–99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Jacobsen SM, Shirtliff ME (2011) Proteus mirabilis biofilms and catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Virulence 2(5):460–465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Hook AL et al (2012) Combinatorial discovery of polymers resistant to bacterial attachment. Nat Biotechnol 30(9):868–875

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Niveditha S et al (2012) The isolation and the biofilm formation of uropathogens in the patients with catheter associated urinary tract infections (UTIs). J Clin Diagn Res 6(9):1478–1482

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Umscheid CA et al (2011) Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 32(2):101–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Gastmeier P et al (2011) Benchmarking of urinary tract infection rates: experiences from the intensive care unit component of the German national nosocomial infections surveillance system. J Hosp Infect 78(1):41–44

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Clarke K et al (2013) Reduction in catheter-associated urinary tract infections by bundling interventions. Int J Qual Health Care 25(1):43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Fakih MG et al (2012) Reducing inappropriate urinary catheter use: a statewide effort. Arch Intern Med 172(3):255–260

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Fink R et al (2012) Indwelling urinary catheter management and catheter-associated urinary tract infection prevention practices in Nurses Improving Care for Healthsystem Elders hospitals. Am J Infect Control 40(8):715–720

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Bernard MS, Hunter KF, Moore KN (2012) A review of strategies to decrease the duration of indwelling urethral catheters and potentially reduce the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Urol Nurs 32(1):29–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Huang WC et al (2004) Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in intensive care units can be reduced by prompting physicians to remove unnecessary catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 25(11):974–978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Jaggi N, Sissodia P (2012) Multimodal supervision programme to reduce catheter associated urinary tract infections and its analysis to enable focus on labour and cost effective infection control measures in a tertiary care hospital in India. J Clin Diagn Res 6(8):1372–1376

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention (KRINKO) (2005) Infektionsprävention in Heimen. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 48(9):1061–1080

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Andreessen L, Wilde MH, Herendeen P (2012) Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care: the bundle approach. J Nurs Care Qual 27(3):209–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Jansen IA et al (2012) Appropriate use of indwelling urethra catheters in hospitalized patients: results of a multicentre prevalence study. BMC Urol 12:25

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Krein SL et al (2013) Barriers to reducing urinary catheter use: a qualitative assessment of a statewide initiative. JAMA Intern Med 173(10):881–886

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Rosenthal VD et al (2012) Findings of the international nosocomial infection control consortium (INICC), part I: effectiveness of a multidimensional infection control approach on catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates in pediatric intensive care units of 6 developing countries. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 33(7):696–703

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Tambyah PA, Oon J (2012) Catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis 25(4):365–370

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Knoll BM et al (2011) Reduction of inappropriate urinary catheter use at a Veterans Affairs hospital through a multifaceted quality improvement project. Clin Infect Dis 52(11):1283–1290

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Titsworth WL et al (2012) Reduction of catheter-associated urinary tract infections among patients in a neurological intensive care unit: a single institution‘s success. J Neurosurg 116(4):911–920

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Marra AR et al (2011) Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the zero-tolerance era. Am J Infect Control 39(10):817–822

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Rosenthal VD et al (2012) Impact of a multidimensional infection control strategy on catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates in the adult intensive care units of 15 developing countries: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC). Infection 40(5):517–526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Leblebicioglu H et al (2013) Impact of a multidimensional infection control approach on catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates in adult intensive care units in 10 cities of Turkey: international nosocomial infection control consortium findings (INICC). Am J Infect Control 41:885–891

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Kanj SS et al (2013) Impact of a multidimensional infection control approach on catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates in an adult intensive care unit in Lebanon: International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) findings. Int J Infect Dis 17(9):e686–e690

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63

    Navoa-Ng JA et al (2013) Impact of an International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium multidimensional approach on catheter-associated urinary tract infections in adult intensive care units in the Philippines: international nosocomial infection control consortium (INICC) findings. J Infect Public Health 6(5):389–399

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    Venkatram S, Rachmale S, Kanna B (2010) Study of device use adjusted rates in health care-associated infections after implementation of „bundles“ in a closed-model medical intensive care unit. J Crit Care 25(1):174.e11–174.e18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65

    Phipps S et al (2006) Short term urinary catheter policies following urogenital surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD004374

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66

    Nordqvist P et al (1984) Catheter-free geriatric care. Routines and consequences for clinical infection, care and economy. J Hosp Infect 5:298–304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67

    Stephan F et al (2006) Reduction of urinary tract infection and antibiotic use after surgery: a controlled, prospective, before-after intervention study. Clin Infect Dis 42:1544–1551

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68

    Larsen LD et al (1997) Retrospective analysis of urologic complications in male patients with spinal cord injury managed with and without indwelling urinary catheters. Urology 50:418–422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69

    Esclarin De Ruz A, Garcia Leoni E, Herruzo Cabrera R (2000) Epidemiology and risk factors for urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury. J Urol 164:1285–1289

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70

    Saint S et al (2005) A reminder reduces urinary catheterization in hospitalized patients. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 31:455–462

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71

    Saint S et al (2009) Translating health care-associated urinary tract infection prevention research into practice via the bladder bundle. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 35(9):449–455

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72

    Böthig R, Geng V, Kurze I (2014) Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie (DGU): Management und Durchführung des Intermittierenden Katheterismus (IK) bei Neurogenen Blasenfunktionsstörungen. AWMF 043/048:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73

    Jain M et al (2006) Decline in ICU adverse events, nosocomial infections and cost through a quality improvement initiative focusing on teamwork and culture change. Qual Saf Health Care 15:235–239

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74

    Reilly L et al (2006) Reducing foley catheter device days in a intensive care unit: using the evidence to change practice. AACN Adv Crit Care 17:272–283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75

    Verdier R et al (2006) Impact of an infection control program in an intensive care unit in France. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27:60–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76

    Topal J et al (2005) Prevention of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infections through computerized feedback to physicians and a nurse-directed protocol. Am J Med Qual 20:121–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77

    Rosenthal VD, Guzman S, Safdar N (2004) Effect of education and performance feedback on rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in intensive care units in Argentina. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 25:47–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78

    Webster J et al (2001) Water or antiseptic for periurethral cleaning before urinary catheterization: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Infect Control 29:389–394

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79

    Koskeroglu N, et al (2004) The role of meatal disinfection in preventing catheter-related bacteriuria in an intensive care unit: a pilot study in Turkey. J Hosp Infect 56:236–238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80

    Matsumoto T et al (1997) Prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection by meatal disinfection. Dermatology 195 (Suppl 2):73–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81

    Davis KF et al (2014) Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a quality-improvement initiative. Pediatrics 134(3):e857–e864

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82

    Oman KS et al (2012) Nurse-directed interventions to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Am J Infect Control 40(6):548–553

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83

    White MC, Ragland KE (1995) Urinary catheter-related infections among home care patients. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 22:286–290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84

    Keerasuntonpong A et al (2003) Incidence of urinary tract infections in patients with short-term indwelling urethral catheters: a comparison between a 3-day urinary drainage bag change and no change regimens. Am J Infect Control 31:9–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85

    Al Mohajer M, Darouiche RO (2013) Prevention and treatment of urinary catheter-associated infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep 15(2):116–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86

    Rogers RG et al (2004) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the effect of nitrofurantoin monohydrate macrocrystals on the development of urinary tract infections after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence with suprapubic catheterization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:182–187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87

    Niel-Weise B.S et al (2012) Urinary catheter policies for long-term bladder drainage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD004201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88

    Esposito S et al (2006) A pilot study on prevention of catheter-related urinary tract infections with fluoroquinolones. J Chemother 18:494–501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89

    Schiotz HA, Guttu K (2002) Value of urinary prophylaxis with methenamine in gynecologic surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:743–746

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90

    van den Broek PJ, Daha TJ, Mouton RP (1985) Bladder irrigation with povidone-iodine in prevention of urinary-tract infections associated with intermittent urethral catheterisation. Lancet 1:563–565

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91

    Griffiths R Fernandez R (2007) Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD004011

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92

    McPhail MJ, Abu-Hilal M, Johnson C.D (2006) A meta-analysis comparing suprapubic and transurethral catheterization for bladder drainage after abdominal surgery. British Journal of Surgery 93(9):1038–1044

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93

    Healy EF et al (2012) Suprapubic compared with transurethral bladder catheterization for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 120(3):678–687

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94

    Johansson I et al (2002) Intermittent versus indwelling catheters for older patients with hip fractures. J Clin Nurs 11:651–656

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95

    Halleberg Nyman M et al (2013) Intermittent versus indwelling urinary catheterisation in hip surgery patients: a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 50:1589–1598

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96

    Jannelli ML et al (2007) A randomized controlled trial of clean intermittent self-catheterization versus suprapubic catheterization after urogynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(1):72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97

    Baan AH et al (2003) The effect of suprapubic catheterization versus transurethral catheterization after abdominal surgery on urinary tract infection: a randomized controlled trial. Dig Surg 20:290–295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98

    Piechota H, Pannek J (2007) Katheterdrainage der Harnblase – Stand der Technik und Bedeutung für die Infektionsprävention. Hyg Med 32:336–344

    Google Scholar 

  99. 99

    Merguerian PA et al (1991) Intraoperative anaphylactic reaction due to latex hypersensitivity. Urology 38(4):301–304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. 100

    Hesse A et al (1994) Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Inkrustationsneigung und Drainagekapazität von Silikon- und silikonisierten Latexkathetern. Urologe 34:370–374

    Google Scholar 

  101. 101

    Bach D (1998) Katheter-Inkrustation, Ursachen und Konsequenzen für die Katheterhygiene. Hyg Med 23:404–408

    Google Scholar 

  102. 102

    Jahn P, Beutner K, Langer G (2012) Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD004997

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103

    Pickard R et al (2012) Antimicrobial catheters for reduction of symptomatic urinary tract infection in adults requiring short-term catheterisation in hospital: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 380(9857):1927–1935

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104

    Pickard R et al (2012) Types of urethral catheter for reducing symptomatic urinary tract infections in hospitalised adults requiring short-term catheterisation: multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of antimicrobial- and antiseptic-impregnated urethral catheters (the CATHETER trial). Health Technol Assess 16(47):119–197

    Google Scholar 

  105. 105

    Bull E et al (1991) Single-blind, randomised, parallel group study of the Bard Biocath catheter and a silicone elastomer coated catheter. Br J Urol 68(4):394–399

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. 106

    Johnson JR, Kuskowski M.A, Wilt T. J (2006) Systematic review: antimicrobial urinary catheters to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in hospitalized patients. Ann Intern Med 144(2):116–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. 107

    Karchmer TB et al (2000) A randomized crossover study of silver-coated urinary catheters in hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med 160(21):3294–3298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prävention und Kontrolle Katheter-assoziierter Harnwegsinfektionen. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 58, 641–650 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-015-2152-3

Download citation