Skip to main content
Log in

Prävention von Hautkrebs

Kommunikationsstrategische Überlegungen

Prevention of skin cancer

Considerations on strategic communication

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Seit Jahrzehnten steigt weltweit die Zahl der Hautkrebsneuerkrankungen in der hellhäutigen Bevölkerung an. In Deutschland ist Hautkrebs die am häufigsten auftretende Krebsart. Um die Krankheitslast von Hautkrebs zu reduzieren, spielen der Schutz der Bevölkerung vor ultravioletter Strahlung (primäre Prävention) und die Früherkennung (sekundäre Prävention) eine entscheidende Rolle. In diesem Zusammenhang ist die Information der Bevölkerung von hoher Bedeutung, um präventives Verhalten zu fördern und eine Entscheidung über früherkennende Maßnahmen zu ermöglichen. Ziel dieses Beitrages ist es, einen Überblick über kommunikationsstrategische Möglichkeiten, die zur Informierung der Bevölkerung im Rahmen der Hautkrebsprävention zur Verfügung stehen, zu geben. Um die entsprechenden Bevölkerungsgruppen zielgenau zu erreichen, wird eine vorangehende Zielgruppensegmentierung empfohlen. Zudem sind relevante Multiplikatoren in den Informationsprozess mit einzubeziehen. Bei der Realisierung stehen unterschiedliche Kommunikationsformen und -mittel zur Verfügung, wobei sich insbesondere individualisierte Informationen für eine nachhaltige Information eignen. Damit kommunikative Maßnahmen verschiedene Stufen im Verhaltensprozess und die damit verbundenen Faktoren berücksichtigen, ist eine Entwicklung auf Basis theoretischer Modelle von Vorteil. Elemente der formalen und summativen Evaluation sind geeignet, Interventionen zu begleiten und zu bewerten. Die Literatur zeigt, welche Effekte verschiedene kommunikative Strategien auf Einstellung, Wissen und Verhalten haben, jedoch ist aufgrund der Komplexität kommunikativer Interventionen in der Regel ein Rückschluss einer bestimmten Wirkung auf ein einzelnes kommunikatives Element kaum möglich.

Abstract

In recent decades the numbers of cases of skin cancer have been increasing worldwide in light skinned populations. In Germany skin cancer is the most common form of cancer. To reduce the burden of skin cancer protection from ultraviolet radiation (primary prevention) and early detection (secondary prevention) of the disease play a decisive role. In this context information to the population about preventive behavior and the support of informed decision-making in skin cancer screening are important aspects in communication. This paper gives an overview about communicational aspects in the promotion of skin cancer prevention. In the development of communicational interventions it is important to identify the relevant target groups. Relevant key opinion leaders have to be included in the information process. Additionally, interventions should be based on a theoretical framework and be designed for the respective target group. Furthermore, different forms of communication and communication tools are provided for the realization of an information intervention. To appraise the intervention elements of summative and formal evaluation are available. The current results provide important findings about different effects of communicational aspects on knowledge and behavior of the population; however, due to the complexity of information interventions a particular effect cannot be explained by a single communicational element.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. American Cancer Society. Skin cancer facts [2012 17.12.2013]. http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/CancerCauses/SunandUVExposure/skin-cancer-facts

  2. Helfand M et al (2001) Screening for skin cancer. Am J Prev Med 20(3 Suppl 1):47–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Linos E et al (2009) Increasing burden of melanoma in the United States. J Invest Dermatol 129(7):1666–1674

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stang A et al (2007) Nationwide hospitalization costs of skin melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer in Germany. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 22(1):65–72

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tingenhög G et al (2008) Societal cost of skin cancer in Sweden in 2005. Acta Dermato-Vebereologica 88(5):467–473

    Google Scholar 

  6. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2009 [2009 17.11.2012]. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@nho/documents/document/500809webpdf.pdf

  7. El Ghissassi F et al (2009) A review of human carcinogens – Part D: radiation. Lancet Oncol 10(8):751–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft/Deutsche Krebshilfe/AWMF). S3-Leitlinie Prävention von Hautkrebs, Langversion 1.0, 2014, AWMF Registernummer: 032/052OL [2014 01.01.2014]. http://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/Leitlinien.7.0.html

  9. Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland. GEKID Atlas [2013 17.11.2013]. http://www.ekr.med.uni-erlangen.de/GEKID/Atlas/CurrentVersion/Inzidenz/atlas.html

  10. Kornek T, Augustin M (2013) Skin cancer prevention. J German Soc Dermatol 11(4):283–296, quiz 297–298

    Google Scholar 

  11. Melia J et al (2000) Evaluation of primary prevention initiatives for skin cancer: a review from a U.K. perspective. Br J Dermatol 143(4):701–708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Breitbart E et al (2011) Systematic Skin Cancer Screening in Northern Germany – Feasibility of 360,288 standardized whole-body examinations, and first results on skin cancer incidence and mortality. J Am Acad Dermatol 66(2):201–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über die Früherkennung von Krebserkrankungen (Krebsfrüherkennungs-Richtlinie/KFE-RL). Bundesanzeiger, 2009. Nr. 148a

  14. Rimer BK et al (2004) Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening? Cancer 101(5 Suppl):1214–1228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greinert R, Boniol M (2011) Skin cancer – primary and secondary prevention (information campaigns and screening) – with a focus on children & sunbeds. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 107(3):473–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dierks M-L, Schwarz FW (2001) Rollenveränderungen durch New Public Health. Vom Patienten zum Konsumenten und Bewerter von Gesundheitsleistungen. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 44(8):796–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bastian H (2008) Health literacy and patient information: developing the methodology for a national evidence-based health website. Patient Educ Couns 73(3):551–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffmann T, Twork S, Kugler J (2009) Patientenorientierung im Internet. Heilberufe 61(4):98–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baumann E (2006) Auf der Suche nach der Zielgruppe – Das Informationsverhalten hinsichtlich Gesundheit und Krankheit als Grundlage erfolgreicher Gesundheitskommunikation. In: Böcken J et al (Hrsg) Gesundheitsmonitor 2006. Gesundheitsversorgung und Gestaltungsoptionen aus der Perspektive von Bevölkerung und Ärzten. Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh, S 117–153

  20. Roski R (2009) Akteure, Ziele und Stakeholder im Gesundheitswesen – Business Marketing, Social Marketing und Zielgruppensegmentierung. In: Roski R (Hrsg) Zielgruppengerechte Gesundheitskommunikation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, S 3–31

  21. Nutbeam D (2008) The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med 67(12):2072–2078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kiekbusch S et al (2000) Impact of a cancer education multimedia device on public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors: a controlled intervention study in Southern Sweden. J Cancer Educ 15(4):232–236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nutbeam D (1998) Health promotion glossary. Health Promot Int 5:49–64

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bergsma LJ, Carney ME (2008) Effectiveness of health-promoting media literacy education: a systematic review. Health Educ Res 23(3):522–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Prochaska JO et al (2005) Stage-based expert systems to guide a population of primary care patients to quit smoking, eat healthier, prevent skin cancer, and receive regular mammograms. Prev Med 41(2):406–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Greinert R et al (2003) Prävention von Hautkrebs. Hautarzt 54(12):1152–1163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McCormick LK et al (1999) Evaluation of a skin cancer prevention module for nurses: change in knowledge, self-efficacy, and attitudes. Am J Health Promot 13(5):282–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mikkilineni R et al (2001) The impact of the basic skin cancer triage curriculum on provider’s skin cancer control practices. J Gen Intern Med 16(5):302–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mikkilineni R et al (2002) The impact of the basic skin cancer triage curriculum on providers‘ skills, confidence, and knowledge in skin cancer control. Prev Med 34(2):144–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goulart J et al (2011) Skin cancer education for primary care physicians: a systematic review of published evaluated interventions. J Gen Intern Med 26(9):1027–1035

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Real K, Rimal RN (2007) Friends talk to friends about drinking: exploring the role of peer communication in the theory of normative social behavior. Health Commun 22(2):169–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Geulen D (2007) Sozialisation. In: Joas H (Hrsg) Lehrbuch der Soziologie. Campus, Frankfurt, S 137–159

  33. Glanz K et al (2013) Randomized trial of tailored skin cancer prevention for children: the Project SCAPE family study. J Health Commun 18(11):1368–1383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Quereux G et al (2009) Prospective trial on a school-based skin cancer prevention project. Eur J Cancer Prev 18(2):133–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hornung RL et al (2000) Interactive computer technology for skin cancer prevention targeting children. Am J Prev Med 18(1):69–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Glanz K, Schoenfeld ER, Steffen A (2010) A randomized trial of tailored skin cancer prevention messages for adults: Project SCAPE. Am J Public Health 100(4):735–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gritz ER et al (2005) An intervention for parents to promote preschool children’s sun protection: effects of Sun Protection is Fun! Prev Med 41(2):357–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hanrahan PF et al (1995) The effect of an educational brochure on knowledge and early detection of melanoma. Aust J Public Health 19(3):270–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Adams MA et al (2009) Reconceptualising decisional balance in an adolecent sun protection intervention: mediating effects and theoretical interpretations. Health Psychol 28(2):217–255

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lustria ML et al (2009) Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the web: review and analysis of key components. Patient Educ Couns 74(2):156–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Austoker J et al (2009) Interventions to promote cancer awareness and early presentation: systematic review. Br J Cancer 101(Suppl 2):S31–S39

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Boer H, Ter Huurne E, Taal E (2006) Effects of pictures and textual arguments in sun protection public service announcements. Cancer Detect Prev 30(5):432–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Girardi S et al (2006) Superiority of a cognitive education with photographs over ABCD criteria in the education of the general population to the early detection of melanoma: a randomized study. Int J Cancer 118(9):2276–2280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Norman CD et al (2008) Web-assisted tobacco interventions: empowering change in the global fight for the public’s (e)Health. J Med Internet Res 10(5):e48

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Vance K, Howe W, Dellavalle RP (2009) Social internet sites as a source of public health information. Dermatol Clin 27(2):133–136, vi

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Køster B et al (2011) Sunbed use and campaign initiatives in the Danish population, 2007–2009: a cross-sectional study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 25(11):1351–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim J-N, Yoo S-W, Shen H (2010) Mapping health communication scholarship: breadth, depth, and agenda of published research in Health Communication. Health Commun 25(6–7):487–503

    Google Scholar 

  48. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K (2008) Health behavior and health education. Theory, research, and practice, Aufl. 4. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

  49. Slater M (2000) Specification and misspecification of theoretical foundations and logic models for health communication campaigns. Health Commun 20(2):149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Fishbein M, Yzer MC (2003) Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Communication Theory 13(2):164–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Duffy SA et al (2013) Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of sun protection interventions for operating engineers. BMC Public Health 13:273

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kang H, Walsh-Childers K (2012) Sun-care product advertising in parenting magazines: what information does it provide about sun protection? Health Commun 29(1):1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Craciun C et al (2012) Enhancing planning strategies for sunscreen use at different stages of change. Health Educ Res 27(5):857–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Prentice-Dunn S, McMath BF, Cramer RJ (2009) Protection motivation theory and stages of change in sun protective behavior. J Health Psychol 14(2):297–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Becker MH (1974) The health belief model and personal health behavior, 2. Aufl. Society for Public Health Education, San Francisco

  56. Garside R, Pearson M, Moxham T (2010) What influences the uptake of information to prevent skin cancer? A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Educ Res 25(1):162–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF (1997) The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 12(1):38–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bonfadelli H, Friemel T (2006) Kommunikationskampagnen im Gesundheitsbereich. Grundlagen und Anwendung. UVK Verlagsgesellschaft GmbH, Konstanz

  59. Schnabel P, Bödeker M (2012) Gesundheitskommunikation. Beltz Juventa, Weinheim

  60. Valente TW (2001) Evaluating communication campaigns. In: Rice RE, Atkin CK (Hrsg) Public communication campaigns. Sage Publications, London, S 105–124

  61. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Janz NK, Becker MH (1984) The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q 11(1):1–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S (2001) A measure of informed choice. Health Expect 4(2):99–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Bunge M, Mühlhauser I, Steckelberg A (2010) What constitutes evidence-based patient information? Overview of discussed criteria. Patient Educ Couns 78(3):316–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Steckelberg A et al (2005) Kriterien für evidenzbasierte Patienteninformationen. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich Gesundhwes 99:343–351

    Google Scholar 

  66. Köpke S et al (2005) In Deutschland gebräuchliche Bewertungsinstrumente für Patienteninformationen – eine kritische Analyse. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 99:353–357

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Greinert R et al (2007) Periods of life program. In: Ringborg U et al (Hrsg) Skin cancer prevention. informa healthcare, New York, S 339–344

  68. Glazebrook C, Garrud P, Avery A et al (2006) Impact of a multimedia intervention „Skinsafe“ on patients‘ knowledge and protective behaviors. Preventive Medicine 42(6):449–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Idriss NZ, Alikhan A, Baba K, Armstrong AW (2009) Online, video-based patient education improves melanoma awareness: a randomized controlled trial. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 15(10):992–997

    Google Scholar 

  70. Janda M, Baade PD, Youl PH et al (2010) The skin awareness study: Promoting thorough skin self-examination for skin cancer among men 50 years or older. Contemporary Clinical Trials 31(1):119–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. M.P. Anders, E. Baumann und E.W. Breitbart geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag enthält keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.P. Anders MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anders, M., Baumann, E. & Breitbart, E. Prävention von Hautkrebs. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 57, 343–350 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-014-1936-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-014-1936-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation