Skip to main content

Innovative Schulungskonzepte in der medizinischen Rehabilitation

Innovative concepts for patient education in medical rehabilitation

Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz volume 54, Article number: 444 (2011) Cite this article

Zusammenfassung

Moderne Patientenschulung dient dem Empowerment von Rehabilitanden. Während traditionellerweise unter Schulung meist Wissensvermittlung verstanden wurde, stellen aktuelle Konzepte Handlungskompetenzen und motivationale Faktoren in den Mittelpunkt. Den Teilnehmern sollen Strategien und Fertigkeiten zur Verfügung gestellt werden, um informierte Entscheidungen und Selbstmanagement hinsichtlich Gesundheit und Lebensstil vornehmen zu können. Entsprechend hat sich die Didaktik weg vom Frontalvortrag hin zu einem interaktiven, teilnehmerorientierten Vorgehen gewandelt. Metaanalysen dokumentieren, dass eine derart konzipierte Patientenschulung wirksam ist. Allerdings besteht bei der Implementierung neuartiger Programme in der Praxis noch Optimierungsbedarf. Das von der Deutschen Rentenversicherung Bund geförderte Zentrum Patientenschulung hat eine Bestandsaufnahme der Schulungspraxis vorgenommen, Qualitätskriterien für Schulungen entwickelt, eine Internetdatenbank geschaffen, in der Schulungen nutzerfreundlich präsentiert werden, und bietet vielfältige Dienstleistungen zur Optimierung der Schulungspraxis an. Am Beispiel eines innovativen Programms wird der State of the Art bei der Schulung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation vorgestellt.

Abstract

Patient education aims to empower rehabilitants. While patient education has, in the past, been conceived of as providing solely information, modern self-management concepts now focus on both behavioral competencies and motivational factors. Participants receive all the skills and tools necessary to make informed decisions regarding both their health and lifestyles and to actively participate in the rehabilitation process. Accordingly, didactic methods have changed from predominantly vertical lectures to more patient-oriented and interactive approaches. Meta-analyses have proven that patient education is effective in improving the chronic conditions of patients. However, the implementation of modern concepts into routine care is still suboptimal. The Center of Patient Education, funded by the German Statutory Pension Insurance, has performed a survey of the present state of patient education within medical rehabilitation programs in Germany. Furthermore, quality criteria for patient education have been developed, an internet database presenting self-management programs in a systematic manner has been created, and various services designed to improve educational practice are being offered by the Center of Patient Education. Lastly, a state-of-the-art, self-management education program is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Faller H (2003) Shared Decision Making: Ein Ansatz zur Stärkung der Partizipation des Patienten in der Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation 42:129–135

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Faller H (2003) Empowerment als Ziel der Patientenschulung. Praxis Klin Verhaltensmed Rehabil 16:353–357

    Google Scholar 

  3. Petermann F (Hrsg) (1997) Patientenschulung und Patientenberatung, 2. Aufl. Hogrefe, Göttingen

  4. Faller H (2001) Patientenschulung: Konzept und Evaluation. Praxis Klin Verhaltensmed Rehabil 14:97–106

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vries U de, Petermann F (2010) Patientenschulung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehab Kuror 20:137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aujoulat I, d’Hoore W, Deccache A (2007) Patient empowerment in theory and practice: Polysemy or cacophonie? Patient Educ Couns 66:13–20

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holmström I, Röing M (2010) The relation between patient-centeredness and patient empowerment: a discussion on concepts. Patient Educ Couns 79:167–172

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tengland PA (2007) Empowerment: A goal or a means for health promotion? Med Health Care Philos 10:197–207

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Faller H, Reusch A, Ströbl V, Vogel H (2008) Patientenschulung als Element der Patientenorientierung in der Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation 47:77–83

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lippke S, Ziegelmann JP, Schwarzer R (2004) Initiation and maintenance of physical exercise: stage-specific effects of a planning intervention. Res Sports Med 12:221–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper HC, Booth K, Gill G (2003) Patients‘ perspectives on diabetes health care education. Health Educ Res 18:191–206

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vries U de, Mühlig S, Waldmann H-C, Petermann F (2008) Patient satisfaction with different asthma-training variants. Patient Educ Couns 70:266–275

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson RM, Funnell MM (2005) Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm. Patient Educ Couns 57:153–157

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chodosh J, Morton SC, Mojica W et al (2005) Meta-analysis: chronic disease self-management programs for older adults. Ann Intern Med 143:427–438

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Faller H, Reusch A, Vogel H et al (2005) Patientenschulung. Rehabilitation 44:277–286

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Newman S, Steed L, Mulligan K (2004) Self-management interventions for chronic illness. Lancet 364:1523–1537

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weingarten SR, Henning JM, Badamgarav E et al (2002) Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness – which one works? Meta-analysis of published reports. Br Med J 325:925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark AM, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, McAlister FA (2005) Meta-analysis: secondary prevention programs for patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 143:659–672

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sebregts EHWJ, Falger PRJ, Bär FWHM (2000) Risk factor modification through nonpharmacological interventions in patients with coronary heart disease. J Psychosom Res 48:425–441

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gillies CL, Abrams KR, Lambert PC et al (2007) Pharmacological and lifestyle interventions to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in people with impaired glucose tolerance: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J 334:299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Norris SL, Schmid CH, Lau J et al (2002) Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1159–1171

  22. Ellis SE, Speroff T, Dittus RS et al (2004) Diabetes patient education: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Patient Educ Couns 52:97–105

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guzman J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K et al (2001) Multidisziplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. Br Med J 322:1511–1516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Warsi A, Wang PS, La Valley MP et al (2004) Self-management education programs in chronic disease: a systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Arch Intern Med 164:1641–1649

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Riemsma RP, Taal E, Kirwan JR, Rasker JJ (2004) Systematic review of rheumatoid arthritis patient education. Arthritis Rheum 51:1045–1059

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gibson PG, Powell H, Coughlan J et al (2003) Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001117

  27. Rehse B, Pukrop R (2003) Effects of psychosocial interventions on quality of life in adult cancer patients: meta-analysis of 37 published controlled outcome studies. Patient Educ Couns 50:179–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dusseldorp E, Elderen T van, Maes S et al (1999) A meta-analysis of psychoeducational programs for coronary heart disease patients. Health Psychol 18:506–519

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Conn VS, Hafdahl AR, Brown SA, Brown LM (2008) Meta-analysis of patient education interventions to increase physical activity among chronically ill adults. Patient Educ Couns 70:157–172

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ogilvie D, Foster CE, Rothnie H et al (2007) Interventions to promote walking: systematic review. Br Med J 334:1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Figar S, Galarza C, Petrlik E et al (2006) Effect of education on blood pressure control in elderly persons. Am J Hypertens 19:737–743

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Keers JC, Bouma J, Links TP et al (2006) One-year follow-up effects of diabetes rehabilitation for patients with prolonged self-management difficulties. Patient Educ Couns 60:16–23

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Herbert RJ, Gagnonaj Rennick JE, O’Loughlin JL (2009) A systematic review of questionnaires measuring health-related empowerment. Res Theory Nurs Pract 23:107–132

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Osborne RH, Elsworth GR, Whitfield K (2007) The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): An outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns 66:192–201

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sudre P, Jacquemet S, Uldry C, Perneger TV (1999) Objectives, methods and content of patient education programmes for adults with asthma: systematic review of studies published between 1979 and 1998. Thorax 54:681–687

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mullen PD, Mains DA, Velez R (1992) A meta-analysis of controlled trials of cardiac patient education. Patient Educ Couns 19:143–162

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C et al (2009) Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol 28:690–701

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Graves KD (2003) Social cognitive theory and cancer patients‘ quality of life: a meta-analysis of psychosocial intervention components. Health Psychol 22:210–219

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Glueckauf RL, Ketterson TU (2004) Telehealth interventions for individuals with chronic illness: research review and implications for practice. Prof Psychol Res Pract 35:615–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jaana M, Paré G (2006) Home telemonitoring of patients with diabetes: a systematic assessment of observed effects. J Eval Clin Pract 13:242–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mittag O, China C, Hoberg E et al (2006) Outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation with versus without a follow-up intervention rendered by telephone (Lübeck follow-up trial): overall and gender-specific effects. Int J Rehab Res 29:295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Störk S, Faller H, Schowalter M et al (2009) Evidenz-basiertes Krankheitsmanagement bei Herzinsuffizienz (HeartNetCare-HF Würzburg). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 134:773–776

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wolf M, Maurer W-J, Dogs P, Kordy H (2006) E-Mail in der Psychotherapie – ein Nachbehandlungsmodell via Electronic Mail für die stationäre Psychotherapie. Psychother Psych Med 56:138–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gollwitzer P, Sheeran P (2006) Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analyses of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 38:69–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sniehotta F, Scholz U, Schwarzer R (2006) Action plans and coping plans for physical exercise: a longitudinal intervention study in cardiac rehabilitation. Br J Health Psychol 11:23–37

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ströbl V, Friedl-Huber A, Küffner R et al (2007) Beschreibungs- und Bewertungskriterien für Patientenschulungen. Praxis Verhaltensmed Klin Rehabil 20:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ströbl V, Küffner R, Müller J et al (2009) Patientenschulung: Qualitätskriterien der Schulungsumsetzung. Rehabilitation 48:166–173

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Friedl-Huber A, Küffner R, Ströbl V et al (2007) Praxis der Patientenschulung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation – eine empirische Bestandsaufnahme bei 771 Rehabilitationseinrichtungen. Praxis Verhaltensmed Klin Rehabil 20:15–20

    Google Scholar 

  49. Reusch A, Ströbl V, Friedl-Huber A et al (2007) Entwicklungsbedarf von Patientenschulungen in der medizinischen Rehabilitation. 16. Rehabilitationswissenschaftliches Kolloquium vom 26.3.07 bis 28.3.07 in Berlin. DRV-Schriften 72:36–38

  50. Brandes I, Bönisch A, Vries U de et al (2008) Modellhafte Einführung von Patientenschulungsprogrammen in der Rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehab Kuror 18:344–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vries U de, Brandes I, Krauth C, Petermann F (2008) Patientenschulungsprogramme in der pneumologischen Rehabilitation: Ergebnisse einer Implementierungsstudie. Gesundheitswesen 70:572–581

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bönisch A, Ehlebracht-König I (2008) Ein praxisorientierter Leitfaden zur Implementierung von Patientenschulungsprogrammen in der rheumatologischen Rehabilitationskliniken. http://www.zentrum-patientenschulung.de. Zugegriffen: 1. September 2009

  53. Bundesversicherungsanstalt für Angestellte (2005) Gesundheitstraining in der medizinischen Rehabilitation. http://www.deutsche-rentenversicherung.de

  54. Meng K, Seekatz B, Roßband H et al (2009) Entwicklung eines standardisierten Rückenschulungsprogramms für die orthopädische Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation 48:335–344

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Waddell G (2004) The biopsychosocial model. In: Waddell G (Hrsg) The back pain revolution. Churchill Livingston, Edinburgh, S 265–282

  56. Schwarzer R (2008) Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psych Int Rev 57:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  57. Abraham C, Michie S (2008) A taxonomy of behaviour change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol 27:379–387

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J et al (2008) From theory to intervention: Mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psych Int Rev 57:660–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychotherapie und Medizinische Psychologie, Universität Würzburg, Klinikstr. 3, 97070, Würzburg, Deutschland

    H. Faller, A. Reusch & K. Meng

Authors
  1. H. Faller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Reusch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Faller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faller, H., Reusch, A. & Meng, K. Innovative Schulungskonzepte in der medizinischen Rehabilitation. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 54, 444 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-011-1237-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-011-1237-x

Schlüsselwörter

  • Patientenschulung
  • Empowerment
  • Selbstmanagement

Keywords

  • Education of patients
  • Empowerment
  • Self-management