Skip to main content
Log in

Flüssigkeitstherapie

Intensivmedizinische Studien aus 2018/2019

Fluid therapy

Intensive care studies from 2018-2019

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
Der Anaesthesist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Rhodes A et al (2017) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Crit Care Med 45(3):486–552. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leisman DE et al (2018) Predictors, prevalence, and outcomes of early crystalloid responsiveness among initially hypotensive patients with sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 46(2):189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marik PE et al (2017) Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: an analysis of a large national database. Intensive Care Med 43(5):625–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Macdonald SPJ et al (2018) Restricted fluid resuscitation in suspected sepsis associated hypotension (REFRESH): a pilot randomised controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 44(12):2070–2078

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Singer M et al (2016) The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8):801–810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Permpikul C et al (2019) Early use of Norepinephrine in septic shock resuscitation (CENSER) : a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 199(9):1097–1105. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201806-1034OC

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A (2018) The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update. Crit Care Med 46(6):997–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hernandez G et al (2019) Effect of a resuscitation strategy targeting peripheral perfusion status vs serum lactate levels on 28-day mortality among patients with septic shock: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK randomized clinical trial. JAMA 321(7):654–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Finfer S et al (2004) A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 350(22):2247–2256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Caironi P et al (2014) Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. N Engl J Med 370(15):1412–1421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Martensson J et al (2018) Small volume resuscitation with 20% albumin in intensive care: physiological effects : the SWIPE randomised clinical trial. Intensive Care Med 44(11):1797–1806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Weigand.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

C.J. Reuß, M. Dietrich, C. Beynon, A. Hecker, C. Jungk, D. Michalski, C. Nusshag, K. Schmidt, M. Bernhard, T. Brenner und M.A. Weigand geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reuß, C.J., Dietrich, M., Beynon, C. et al. Flüssigkeitstherapie. Anaesthesist 68, 697–701 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-019-00639-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-019-00639-y

Navigation