Skip to main content
Log in

Anwendung der aktuellen Reanimationsrichtlinien 2005

Fallbericht einer erfolgreichen kardiopulmonalen Reanimation

Application of the current resuscitation guidelines 2005

Case report of successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation

  • Kasuistiken
  • Published:
Der Anaesthesist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die internationalen Richtlinien für die kardiopulmonale Reanimation unterliegen einem stetigen Wandel und wurden Anfang November 2005 überarbeitet. Der vorliegende Fallbericht beschreibt die präklinische kardiopulmonale Reanimation („cardiopulmonary resuscitation“, CPR) eines Patienten, der den Kreislaufstillstand nach Thoraxkompression (30:2), Maskenbeatmung sowie mehrmaliger biphasischer Defibrillation (1er-Schocks) ohne neurologische Folgeschäden überlebt hat und gibt einen praxisnahen Überblick über die wichtigsten Neuerungen der aktuellen Reanimationsleitlinien. Die durchgeführten Maßnahmen werden anhand der aktuellen Richtlinien hinterfragt und erläutert.

Abstract

The international guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation are subject to continuous modification and were revised in November 2005. This report describes a case of an out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation where the patient survived a cardiac arrest without neurological sequelae after chest compression (30:2), bag-mask ventilation and multiple biphasic defibrillation (single shocks). This article gives a practical review of the most important new recommendations in the current resuscitation guidelines. The accomplished measures are discussed on the background of the new recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. ECC Committee, Subcommittees and Task Forces of the American Heart Association (2005) 2005 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 112 [Suppl 24]: 1–211

  2. European Resuscitation Council (2005) European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Resuscitation 67: 1–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wik L, Hansen TB, Fylling F et al. (2003) Delaying defibrillation to give basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation to patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: a randomized trial. JAMA 289: 1389–1395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cobb LA, Fahrenbruch CE, Walsh TR et al. (1999) Influence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to defibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. JAMA 281: 1182–1188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kellum MJ, Kennedy KW, Ewy MD (2006) Cardiocerebral resuscitation improves survival of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Med 119: 335–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Planta M von (1992) Kardiopulmonale Reanimation: Determinanten des Überlebens. Edition Medizin, VCH, Weinheim

  7. Kern K, Hilwig R, Berb R et al. (2002) Importance of continuous chest compression during CPR. Circulation 105: 645–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H et al. (2005) Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 293: 299–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H et al. (2005) Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 293: 305–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goedecke A von, Bowden K, Keller C et al. (2005) Verkürzte Inspirationszeit während der Beatmung eines ungeschützten Atemweges. Effekt auf die Magen- und Lungenbeatmung im Simulationsmodell. Anaesthesist 54: 117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. White RD, Blackwell TH, Russell JK et al. (2005) Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation, resuscitation or survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a non-escalating biphasic waveform defibrillator. Resuscitation 64: 63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mittal S, Ayati S, Stein KM et al. (1999) Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic for transthoracic ventricular defibrillator. J Am Cardiol 34: 1595–1601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu T, Weil MH, Tang W et al. (2002) Adverse outcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation. Circulation 106: 368–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hess EP, White RD (2005) Ventricular fibrillation is not provoked by chest compression during post-shock organized rhythms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 66: 7–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morrison LJ, Verbeek PR, McDonald AC et al. (2000) Mortality and prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. JAMA 283: 2686–2692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goedecke A von, Keller C, Wenzel V (2006) Maskenbeatmung als Rückzugsstrategie zur endotrachealen Intubation. Anaesthesist 55: 70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pepe PE, Zachariah BS, Chandra NC (1993) Invasive airway techniques in resuscitation. Ann Emerg Med 22: 393–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wenzel V, Russo S, Arntz HR et al. (2006) Die neuen Reanimationsleitlinien 2005 des European Resuscitation Council – Kommentar und Ergänzung. Anaesthesist 55: 958–979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Spoehr F, Boettiger BW (2003) Safety of thrombolysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Drug Saf 26: 367–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lederer W, Lichtenberger C, Pechlaner C et al. (2002) Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 108 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 50: 71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW et al. (2004) ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction – executive summary: a report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 110: 588–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sabatine MS (2005) Something old, something new: beta blockers and clopidogrel in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 366: 1587–1589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. ISIS-1 Collaborative Group (1986) Randomised trial of intravenous atenolol among 16027 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-1. Lancet 2: 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  24. ISIS-1 Collaborative Group (1988) Mechanisms for the early mortality reduction produced by beta-blockade started early in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1: 921–923

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roberts R, Rogers WJ, Mueller HS et al. (1991) Immediate versus deferred beta-blockade following thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) II.B-Study. Circulation 83: 422–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen ZM, Pan HC, Chen YP et al. (2005) Early intravenous then oral metoprolol in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 366: 1622–1632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Koppenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eppinger, M., Flury, G., Wenzel, V. et al. Anwendung der aktuellen Reanimationsrichtlinien 2005. Anaesthesist 56, 1133–1136 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-007-1247-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-007-1247-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation